If he wasn't a massive idiot he wouldn't have left his wife of one year for a fifteen year-old girl.
Indeed.
If he wasn't a massive idiot he wouldn't have left his wife of one year for a fifteen year-old girl.
Anybody else notice the similarities between his wife and the girl? Same shade of hair colour, same bluish-green eyes, similar prominent noses, it's almost like he's looking for the younger model...![]()
If he wasn't a massive idiot he wouldn't have left his wife of one year for a fifteen year-old girl.
But of course we live in a time when most people will be baying for his blood. "Lock up the pedo!" will be the massed chants of the Sun/ Mirror/ Daily Mail readers.
If he wasn't a massive idiot he wouldn't have left his wife of one year for a fifteen year-old girl.
Abusing a position of trust is quite a big deal.Let off for what? What criminal act has he committed, and if he has then why would it be in the public interest to imprison him?
The CPS/Crown Office only seek prosecution if it's in the public interest. Why do you believe that the teacher ought to be prosecuted, and for what?
I've stated that I think what he has done is inappropriate and both parties ought to answer questions to their superiors and parents. However I don't believe that criminal charges should be levelled at either of them based on what we know now. There is no reason to.
If a 15 year old is able to take advantage of him he was never fit to be a teacher.Devils Advocate.
How do you know she hasn't taken advantage of him?
I just don't know how someone can put the family, especially their mum through all that worry, obviously the mum just wants her home.
That lass hasn't a care in the world, they both should be locked up, got no sympathy for either of them.
The parents of a teacher who has eloped to France with one of his pupils, Megan Stammers, have said they fear he may “flip” before the couple are found. . . .
It is believed Mr Forrest, who married in April last year, had been in a relationship with the teenager for as much as seven months and fled the country with her after the school informed him he was to be suspended.
His father Jim Forrest, defended his son and said he was a “gentle and caring” person who was extremely vulnerable.
Speaking at the family home in Orpington, Kent, Mr Forrest said: “I am worried about Jeremy; I am not worried about Megan. I can tell you my son is one of the most gentle, caring people you will ever meet. I worry for him more than Megan in case he flips.”
In the Telegraph today is something that makes me even more worried. Right from the start his neighbours said he had a tendency to flip out and shout and scream.
What does he mean by flip? If he is describing his temper, why would Megan not be in danger?
If only he'd of waited another year...
One year is not enough as a teacher. The rules change as he is considered a person in a position of trust. The minimum age they could have had sexual intercourse is when she reached the age of 18.
All this nonsense about him abusing his position is just that, nonsense. On the face of it, it seems pretty consensual. I think it's unfair to state that he is obviously the big bogey man here that lured this girl into his sexual den of deviance, until we actually have any proof that suggests such. Circumstantial evidence (as that is all we have) seems to show her being quite willing to go along with him, and there has been reports of this being a longish term thing.