Dog knifed.

i hate idiots that think a dog 'locks' its jaw

they just don't, research has shown that. unless your dog has tetanus but thats not the lock jaw these people are on about . so instantly i hate the guy for stabbing the dog.

if another dog was attacking my dog it would have to kill it quickly cause my tiny tiny bull terrier is a ferocious little runt when it comes to a dog fight

i have to say they guy is a absolute idiot too. you do not ever kick or punch a dog that is biting you or something else, these breeds just get wound up by that and that will not get them to let go, they will still attack with broken ribs/legs they are that dedicated.

the best way i have found to break up dogs in choke the buggers out. if possible pick them up by their collar with there feet off of the ground



at the end of the day though this guy done what he thought was best. the bulldog should not of been off a lead in a area like that if it was dog aggressive unless it was muzzled
 
Last edited:
Nate75 said:
Absolutley this.
Click to expand...

I didn't agree with this before but tbh I do more now. It would discourage people who don't really want a dog.

Love the troll comments! By Your account (survival of fitest) the guy therefore was right to kill the dog as he had the ability.. Using that logic

The guy did the only thing he could with a dog like that.
 
The big dog should have been on a lead and also had a muzzle. I have seen videos on live leak of dogs attacking other dogs and even kids and its horrible. I don't blame the guy at all and glad that he wasn't charged.
 
I read that article and my thoughts were initially the same as that of the OP, of horror that someone could do that to a dog. However, when you read on, it changes the perception completely. Whilst I can't condone what the guy did, he was trying to save his own animal from the jaws of a larger, more powerful opponent and who's to say I'd have done anything different in his position?

The problem here rests firmly with the owner of the bulldog - whilst it is all unsubstantiated, there's plenty of evidence in the article to suggest that she either didn't know how to control it or just plain and simple didn't give a damn. The very fact that the bulldog was named Tyson, gives some idea of the mentality of the owner.

I was going to respond to the 'runt getting what it deserved' comment, but it's so beneath contempt I don't think I'll bother, save to say that it's exactly the kind of thing I'd expect someone who owns an aggressive dog to come out with :mad:
 
Last edited:
Adnams Drinker said:
The problem here rests firmly with the owner of the bulldog - whilst it is all unsubstantiated, there's plenty of evidence in the article to suggest that she either didn't know how to control it or just plain and simple didn't give a damn.
Click to expand...

Which suggests licensing would be a good idea?
 
a dog license would not work

the people who have dogs as a weapon will not have a licence, the reason they have these dogs is so they can walk past the police with it on show and not get a instant 5 years.

and even so what if this woman did have a dog licence ... it wouldn't stop a dog attacking another dog, are you just going to wave the piece of paper in front of the dogs face

the only people this would punish would be the genuine owners

but then again thats how britain works right ... punish the responsible cause of the dimwits taking advantage
 
sketchytom said:
a dog license would not work

the people who have dogs as a weapon will not have a licence, the reason they have these dogs is so they can walk past the police with it on show and not get a instant 5 years.

and even so what if this woman did have a dog licence ... it wouldn't stop a dog attacking another dog, are you just going to wave the piece of paper in front of the dogs face

the only people this would punish would be the genuine owners

but then again thats how britain works right ... punish the responsible cause of the dimwits taking advantage
Click to expand...

The woman would have to earn and pay money for a licence. You would hope it would in some way make her appreciate the responsibility of "owning" a dog.

Without anything in place there is nothing to question anyone from having a dog.

Yes it would be hard to manage, and like driving punish the honest first but the point is - there has to be something!
 
Nate75 said:
The woman would have to earn and pay money for a licence. You would hope it would in some way make her appreciate the responsibility of "owning" a dog.

Without anything in place there is nothing to question anyone from having a dog.

Yes it would be hard to manage, and like driving punish the honest first but the point is - there has to be something!
Click to expand...

well i for one will not be getting a licence.

and tell me what adding a 100 pound license that anyone can buy will do?

what is a extra 100 quid on top of a breed of dog that costs in the region of 600 - 1000 + pounds.

it will not do nothing

to be more realistic i think that a muzzled in a public place law should be implemented.

but even then i would not stick to that law either since my dog cannot back me up without his mouth, without him i would have been robbed




and on top of that i want to know how a dog licence will stop an attacking dog.
sometimes once a dog gets to its matured state of mind they just do not like other dogs, for instance my rottweiler he is weary of strangers dogs since he has got to 18 months and he is a powerful dog about the same weight as the bulldog in question. How would a licence stop this? my dog does not care about a licence.

there is not ever going to be a way to stop dog attacks full stop. but educating people on dog behaviour can make a start. but that will never happen the media exaggerates any dog attack usually naming the breed in the limelight at that time, usually anything bull terrier



this is what happened in my area about 3 years ago.

my friend has a little pomeranian rat dog fur ball thing, it is aggressive against people and other dogs, this dog escaped out of the front door and ran to and started a fight with a stafford that was on a lead. quite obviously the staff was not going to let a rat dog attack it and the pomeranian got its arse kicked the poor dogs intestines were hanging out of its body after the staff swang this thing like a rag doll.

whos fault was that?

the staff got put down cause of this yet it was not the aggressive dog it was defending itself. is this fair? would a licence stop this from happening? clearly the furry rat dog was in the wrong yet the owner of the staff bull terrier 'dangerous dog' was penalised
 
Last edited:
badcompany said:
bring back dog license £100 ish and which includes a test of control the animal.
Click to expand...

Should also include an IQ test. If the dog's smarter than the owner then the owner shouldn't be allowed to keep it. Should cut down on the number of chavs with trophy dogs/ aggressive breeds.
 
The only reason he stabbed it 23 times is because it didn't stop biting after the first 22.

I blame the Bulldog's owner entirely. As a result of her stupidity and selfishness, her pet has died. She should be banned from owning another.
 
Yamahahahahaha said:
I blame the Bulldog's owner entirely. As a result of her stupidity and selfishness, her pet has died. She should be banned from owning another.
Click to expand...

This to be honest, even if the bloke could've handled the situation better, he wasn't sat behind a computer screen while this happened, his dog was in the process being killed by another dog so he did what he thought best at the time. He should never have been put in that situation.

He should buy some better kitchen knives too.
 
Nate75 said:
Less dogs.

And fewer muppets that "own" them.
Click to expand...

BUT IT WONT

there is law on guns

yet there are guns on the streets

there is law on drugs

yet there is drugs on the streets

there is law on knifes

yet there is knifes on the streets

there is a law that to drive you need a licence

yet people drive without one

and so on and so on

SO THEN

explain to me how this so call joke of a licence will stop dangerous dogs being on the street??? cause it wont

all it will do is cost responsible owners more money just like everything in the united crappy kingdom

it is full of half brain people that think a law will actually stop people from having things they probably shouldn't
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom