Cameron withholds 'embarrassing' emails from Leveson

[Zbornak]

According to the front page of tomorrow's Independent.

http://www.politicshome.com/timthumb.php?w=578&src=/images/1.1.Front_Pages/indy_161012.png

What a shocker.

No hotlinked images. Thank you.

 

[[TW]Sponge]

What a shocker.

 

[Hatter The Mad]

What a shocker.

 

[steve-h]

What a shocker.

 

[Chris-.-]

Open thread, broken image.

What a shocker.

 

[Zbornak]

Open thread, broken image.

What a shocker.

Hopefully fixed but new image is lower resolution. Shocking.

 

[pingwing]

What a shocker.

I cry SHENANEGANS!

Does this mean I can withhold anything from an investigation because it will make me look bad?

 

[Chris-.-]

What a shocker.

I cry SHENANEGANS!

Does this mean I can withhold anything from an investigation because it will make me look bad?

Yes

 

[Snax]

So the PM took legal advice that said he did not have to disclose certain emails to Levenson.

How is he in the wrong? He took advice on the point; as long as he followed it there is no problem .

 

[TheMightyTen]

So the PM took legal advice that said he did not have to disclose certain emails to Levenson.

How is he in the wrong? He took advice on the point; as long as he followed it there is no problem .

What is legally acceptable and what is morally right are two very different things

 

[Gogl]

What is legally acceptable and what is morally right are two very different things

He has a wider moral obligation to get re-elected.

 

[cainer]

What is legally acceptable and what is morally right are two very different things

didnt Cameron himself say somthing similar about Jimmy Carr and his Tax arrangements?

 

[antijoke]

I thought this was about James Cameron, I have no idea why.

 

[Dolph]

Levenson did not ask for all emails, only ones relevant to the case that discussed the merger.

Why are some people so determined to smear that all rationality goes out of the window?