But even on minimum wage you can still move out, you may not be able to buy a house quickly or even ever, but the question is if you are living at home for so many years surely you would have saved up something?Unfortunately, not everyone's born to be a high flyer. Some people are just happy trudging along, and as long as they've got enough money to put food on the table, that's enough. If these people weren't around, who would serve you at the till at your favourite food/clothing store. Most of these are minimum wage jobs, and as the minimum wage is about £6.19 (AFAIK), that doesn't leave a lot of wiggle room for fancy things like houses ....
Out of the three of them, two of them (given sufficient funds) would leap at the chance to move into their own pad. The third one (who just happens to be the youngest of the lot) appears to be waiting for his mother to leave this mortal coil in the hopes he'll inherit the property. I wouldn't call him a moneygrabber though. He just has issues with his parents, but finds it easier just to rant about them than actually do anything about it. He's probably the one I feel the least empathy towards, but I still don't think people should judge him for failing to net a £40k a year job.
Well said. Judging somebody because of circumstances you don't know is just wrong, plain and simple.
As an example, I have three friends in their late 30's and early 40's.
The youngest (36) He's single
Second one (44) single.
Third one (42) Again, single
Personally I dont think it is natural, or healthy. I think an individual needs to spread their wings and make their own life, carve out their own patch in the social fabric. Start their own family. Maybe that outlook is a lot to do with our culture in this country and how I have been bought up? I dare say in other cultures/countries living at home would not be frowned upon like it is here.
As for how women view you, I think it is perceived that you are lacking somehow. If you still live with your parents it suggests immaturity and the avoidance of responsibility and perhaps lack of confidence - which women find off putting. Coversely if you are a woman it suggests you may be difficult, a spinster or damaged goods (not nice but I think it is true).
However the truth of what people think does not make what they think true.
My other half lived at home until she was 32/33 - but had lived away from home for several years down south. That didnt work out so she came back and spent 3 years living at home again. It sent her mad, but financially she could not afford her own place. Many men would have run a mile (I'm 6 years younger and had my own house) but I saw past it. I think most open minded decent people will.
But I think there is a stigma attached to it - whether that is justified or not is a different discussion. But yes I would agree that traditionally women tend to view older guys living at home as a bit 'icky'. That said, it has become far more common to leave home later in life because of uni, house prices etc etc.
I think it also depends on why someone is still at home. For instance, in the case of my better half it was because her life was turned upside down and she needed refuge. In the case of my cousin, he has always lived at home because his outlook is that he could never enjoy the same kind of life he does at home if he moved out - which is quite selfish but then if his parents are prepared to put up with it, then who are we to judge?
Also, if you have grown into a caring role for a parent(s) and they rely on you I would say it is a moral dilemma with no easy answer.
I dont think it makes you a bad person, but I do think it makes you a lesser person because it is life experience you havent yet got and you learn a lot from moving out and living your own life (uni does not count - because you are still technically living at home with your parents).
As my father once said, "son, when the bills are dropping on your own door mat, I will listen to your advice on life."
I have taken that comment out of context, but I think it is true - until you have moved out and been self sufficient you are not fully an 'adult' because you have not yet flown the nest. Again maybe that opinion is because of how I was bought up?
My relationship with my parents has improved no end since I moved out 8 years ago - and not only that I felt a real sense of achievement at standing on my own two feet. As an individual I have grown and developed in a way that only taking on responsibility can bring which is something I feel you wont ever achieve living at home.
Buff
You cannot grow up properly while still living with your parents. I personally think people who return from university, get a good job etc but still move back in to their parents house are nuts.
I have been living away from parents permanently for 3 years now and there is no way I would move back in - the rent is worth it.
I've never actually heard of anyone doing this before, and i'm pretty sure no one in this thread has.Theoretically speaking, one could build or purchase their own house, have a successful family and kids, but because they choose to allow their parents to move in and live with them and thus fall under the "Living at home with parents" category, they have some how not gained as much life experience or are a lesser person?
But even on minimum wage you can still move out, you may not be able to buy a house quickly or even ever, but the question is if you are living at home for so many years surely you would have saved up something?
Even if it just means getting a partner, that then doubles the wage and is easily enough to live off.
The third one (who just happens to be the youngest of the lot) appears to be waiting for his mother to leave this mortal coil in the hopes he'll inherit the property. I wouldn't call him a moneygrabber though. He just has issues with his parents, but finds it easier just to rant about them than actually do anything about it. He's probably the one I feel the least empathy towards, but I still don't think people should judge him for failing to net a £40k a year job.
I've never actually heard of anyone doing this before, and i'm pretty sure no one in this thread has.![]()
Even if you don't want a partner, you can still live off minimum wage. The wage is set for each area to allow for living costs.What if you don't WANT a partner? I'm not saying that's the case for these lot, but some people prefer their own company. You can't FORCE them to cohabit. Maybe they just haven't met Miss Right (or Miss Right Now) yet.
I'm not saying it's right, and I'm not saying it's wrong. It's an individual choice. The point is, people have no right to judge other people for how they choose to live their lives. As long as they're not hurting anybody, it's nobody else's business.
Even if you don't want a partner, you can still live off minimum wage. The wage is set for each area to allow for living costs.
I see a trend forming![]()
I'd personally say the bare minimum you need to even think about moving out is £1000, and I'm not even sure that's enough tbh.