How does VAT harm businesses?
Yeah, given the largest US state without a sales tax is Oregon, and the fact that purely the states with a larger economy than Oregon account for roughly 84% of the US economy, that doesn't really mean anything.
If the state does fine without a sales tax then it shows that a sales tax is unnecessary
[TW]Fox;23038229 said:No, it doesn't.
Increase other more straightforward taxes that don't harm businesses in the way VAT does.
If the state does fine without a sales tax then it shows that a sales tax is unnecessary, the fact that many other states have it is irrelevant.
Because many businesses have to charge VAT but often can't claim any or anywhere near as much back because the majority of their costs are staff wages which obviously they don't pay VAT on. So when they reach the VAT registration threshold their profit decreases.
Also the increased price of products means that it negatively affects the cash flow of businesses, and increases the cost of products for non-VAT registered businesses. An increase in corporation tax would be much less harmful to businesses than a sales tax is.
If the state does fine without a sales tax then it shows that a sales tax is unnecessary, the fact that many other states have it is irrelevant.
Because many businesses have to charge VAT but often can't claim any or anywhere near as much back because the majority of their costs are staff wages which obviously they don't pay VAT on. So when they reach the VAT registration threshold their profit decreases.
Also the increased price of products means that it negatively affects the cash flow of businesses, and increases the cost of products for non-VAT registered businesses. An increase in corporation tax would be much less harmful to businesses than a sales tax is.
Stellar refutation there.
It shows that they're raising their revenue using different methods.
To go back to my previous point you could theoretically abolish VAT in the UK but we'd have to pay the equivalent of 60% more Income Tax for that to happen.
I'm not sure I follow. Surely they should be profitable with products before VAT is added? Otherwise they have their pricing structure wrong.
Many businesses are service based, they dont revolve around selling products, so when they have to start paying vat it cuts into their profits because they cant claim back any or they lose customers if they increase their prices to compensate.
Many businesses are service based, they dont revolve around selling products, so when they have to start paying vat it cuts into their profits because they cant claim back any or they lose customers if they increase their prices to compensate.
It doesnt require a 60p rise in income tax, other taxes can be raised as well, but Id be perfectly happy to pay more in other taxes to compensate, its much fairer because unlike vat income tax is means tested to a degree.
well, imagine how I feel in Canada where EVERYTHING is priced without VAT....
So annoying when you see things advertised for one price then when you go and pay its not even that price, such a stupid idea.
Yep, same here.
Only been here 10 days and always forget. Making me the grumpy brit grumbling at the checkout.

Stellar refutation there.

So you're talking about service based organisations who are not VAT registered that are competing with VAT registered service organisations. Can we have some examples?
[TW]Fox;23040750 said:Not really much point wasting time on much else - once you've decided an issue is black and white thats that.