how would politicians serve our interests fully? how would one politician unify the ideas of women's rights and the idea that women should be stoned to death for adultery?
because if they simply choose one then suddenly they do not serve all peoples interests, and the fractures begin.
and internet participation would be how things would be decided?
I think this thread alone proves how that would turn out.
and the rest is basically: "lol if i rubbed out the lines on the map everyone would love each other and everything would be perfect"
with about as much thought put into it, actually less to be honest, of the stoners who go "if the world all smoked weed then everyone would love each other and everything would be perfect".
complete transparency.