It's not a straw man because he did say "A bite is a bite", his comment or stance isn't being misrepresented. It might be inconvenient for him to have people make comments like that, but that's what he said.
Nope, i did read it.. I prowmisss ! Its nothing new.. You're a sensitive SOB arnt you !
The problem is ***** tend not to think through their actions, or understand what counts as daft. What is "funny" on the Internet is not so funny in real life. If I posted a list of 10 "funny" things to do with a shotgun, chances are I'd have an angry American mother shouting at me before the weekend.No more than some of the other daft suggestions, clearly emotionally charged people have come up with! Opinions are exactly that.
It's a straw man because someone is misrepresenting his position by taking it completely out of context, clearly he was not including children in his statement. He was referring to pets allowed to roam around in public places.
I would wager money on a cat being able to seriously harm a child. Doesn't take much to blind someone.
that is one mean looking pussy.
I'm 38 and I've never heard of this happening, it's not that easy to blind someone. I do however personally know quite a few people who have been hospitalised by dogs though including my brother who was bitten on the face by next door's 'friendly', 'oh he's never done anything like that before' dog. Luckily he didn't suffer any permanent damage apart from a small scar.
The reason this has annoyed me is due to the fact if my dog (german shep.) even snapped at someone he would be put down (and rightly so!) so why is it one rule for one and another for something else?
KaHn
indeed, that was my point.
however that line is used shortly before their animal is destroyed,.
in this case you've gone "cats do not attack people no, clearly persons fault. despite lots of evidence to the contrary.
just like the jackass saying it's ok his dog bit you because he's normally a softie.
In this case cat attacked someone, cat should be destroyed.
doesn't matter to the severity of the injury same as it doesn't matter with dogs.
"A bite is a bite" completely overrides that.
The context was that all bites are equal, it's not a straw man.
The severity of the injury is fairly irrelevant - the reason dogs are destroyed (rightly so) when they attack someone is because of the potential to kill or maim someone (a child, for example). I've never heard of a cat killing or maiming someone, hence why they (again rightly so) aren't destroyed if they "attack" people.
How is biting someone so they have to go to hospital for stitches and antibiotics to stop them dying of infection not maiming them?