UKIP Foster Parents Screwed

RMBC would have been criticised either way if/when this story came out. They would've been criticised for leaving a foreign child with foster parents with strong anti immigration views if they'd done nothing and criticised for removing the child as is the case now.

And as for the people suggesting sueing/heads to roll.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Stupid ppolitical posturing by the labour council and stupid "oh look we're doing something about cultural needs after letting dozens of children be raped" attitude by the social sevicies. Given the parents we're encouraging the children to us their native language and even learning.it themselves makes it even sadder.

I can see 100% that the parents may disagree with mass EU immigration but also sympathise and wish to help unfortunate children regardless of background sadly the council could not understand that, I really hope this does not put them.off fostering children in future, as it would.mean more children in the care of incompetent care homes and subjected to the same.risks and fates of the other sex abuse victims
 
It doesn't work like that. As has been repeatedly pointed out, many people belonging to obviously racist groups like the BNP have black and Asian friends, just as gay-bashers sometimes have friends that they know are gay.

Actually it does work like that and this has got nothing to do with the BNP or having friends of another ethnicity. This is about a couple who were happy to welcome children of another ethnicity into their home and were cultural sensitive towards them. The evidence so far is that they are not racist yet people are assuming that because they were members of UKIP (a mainstream party which is currently calling for a change in immigration policy) they are somehow paid up right wing BNP types.

Firstly not everyone will agree with all the policies of the party they support - this couple might well just have a strong stance on EU membership etc.. and even if they did believe immigration policy needs to change - that, in itself, isn't a racist view and indeed is a view that can be held by any legal residents here regardless of ethnic background. Aside from membership of a mainstream political party (which is frankly irrelevant unless you want to make assumptions) all we know is that these people were happy to welcome these children into their home and were sensitive to their cultural needs - evidence so far would indicate that they're emphatically not racist.
 
Firstly not everyone will agree with all the policies of the party they support
Very valid point! I'm a member of a political party yet I do not agree with and support every policy and stance; while I fully support the deporting of all blacks, I'm just not comfortable with the BNPs idea of reintroducing grammar schools.
 
Very valid point! I'm a member of a political party yet I do not agree with and support every policy and stance; while I fully support the deporting of all blacks, I'm just not comfortable with the BNPs idea of reintroducing grammar schools.

Tell me you got that statement the wrong way round.... ? (or are just trying to be funny)

Anywho.. Story just seems really odd. Fostering and adoption rules are really tough as it is, but it seems very odd to remove children from a home just because the folks are members of UKIP. BNP I could understand, as they are outright racist.
 
Last edited:
Right decision, we really do need to be making sure kids don't get foster parents with views that could in anyway compromise them. So we will need to stop placing kids with Catholic and CoE parents (their views on homosexuality are not really suitable these days) stop placing kids with Muslim parents (after all, that sort of sexist attitude needs to be curtailed) and certainly stop putting them with parents that run their own business or are upper level management (we all know how bad capitalism can be). If the parents vote Tory, UKIP, Lib Dem or Labour we should probably be wary too, the last thing we need to do is indoctrinate kids to support a particular political party.

Obviously we are going to need to massively increase the number of care homes and will probably have to reduce the number of adoptions for the same reasons too. But I am sure care is the best place for these kids rather than with a loving family that may have political views we don't like.
 
Very valid point! I'm a member of a political party yet I do not agree with and support every policy and stance; while I fully support the deporting of all blacks, I'm just not comfortable with the BNPs idea of reintroducing grammar schools.

you've completely missed the point tbh...
 
I agree they should follow our laws - also that customs/traditions which cause objective harm should be outlawed - but I don't think people should be forced to act British.

I suppose that depends what you mean by acting British? For me, intergrating with society to a point you can communicate perfectly with the natives is acting British.
 
I think the message the council has sent is stronger than anything those parents could have said to the children. The message is about active segregation and it was to the whole of the UK. This will have an adverse effect on many people, who already like to get in gangs with other like minded people and talk at each other.
 
Obviously we are going to need to massively increase the number of care homes and will probably have to reduce the number of adoptions for the same reasons too. But I am sure care is the best place for these kids rather than with a loving family that may have political views we don't like.
What a bloomin good idea but I think it's been tried before didn't they call them work houses? :p
 
UKIP don't want to kill all immigrants, they want this though:
End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government and all publicly funded bodies
In my judgement a person who would willingly join a party that holds this view has no place looking after children from other cultures.
 
Back
Top Bottom