Best speakers for £150 for music primarily

Associate
Joined
11 Sep 2010
Posts
37
Location
Cardiff, S. Wales
Hi guys,

Ive currently got a set of Logitech Z4 2.1 speakers which I've had since 2008, so i feel like i need an upgrade! These logitech's sound good to me and have been reliable but i want to try something new.

I loooove my music collection so i want some proper quality speakers to make it sound as good as possible!

After doing some research Ive managed to find out that:

- Bose speakers are generally over-rated tat. (Bit like the Apple of the speaker world)

- Audioengine A2's are supposed to be good.


So, with a budget of £150±20, what would you recommend? Ideally looking for a 2.1 setup. ...maybe

Cheers!
 
Corsair SP2500. Try and find somewhere where you can have a listen. You will buy them once you have heard them.

They have impressed me greatly.
 
The Corsair's do state they are for gaming, but they have impressed me with music more. The sub is the size of a microwave oven so be warned.

Those Aego's are certainly meant to be good, but the design is around 8 years old now. Have a look at the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 as well.
 
I own Aegos and compared it to my friends SP2500. Think they're the same or maybe his are a bit better and thats using a Xonar DG soundcard whereas my card is superior.
 
Last edited:
Hmm i dont plan on using these in tandem with any posh soundcard. They will just be plugged straight into my iMac most of the time. If i want to plug them into my gaming PC then i may think about going for a soundcard.

After reading quite a few reviews i think im gonna go for the AE Aego's. Yes they have been pretty much the same since 2006 but they seem to be tried and tested and fully proven as good quality speakers.
 
Hmm i dont plan on using these in tandem with any posh soundcard. They will just be plugged straight into my iMac most of the time. If i want to plug them into my gaming PC then i may think about going for a soundcard.

After reading quite a few reviews i think im gonna go for the AE Aego's. Yes they have been pretty much the same since 2006 but they seem to be tried and tested and fully proven as good quality speakers.

My brother has the Aegos, I have the SP2500s, and the difference once set up is quite compelling, the SP2500s are just that step up in quality in every department, the bass is more controlled and has much more impact, and the way the speakers are bi-amped with the crossover done digitally before amplification makes for unbelievable levels of clarity and separation.

I was impressed with the Aegos when my brother first demoed them, but we where both blown away by the SP2500s.

There are a couple of interviews with the designers/engineers of the SP2500, they are clear they are designed for music, it's just they also cater for games/movies with different DSP modes etc.. however for music you can turn the DSP Off, and the only recommended tweak is to set the 'PoP' EQ, which just adds a nice warmth to the midrange..

You can find plenty of user reports of people going from Aego's to SP2500's and all agree the extra money = extra quality

That's not to say the Aego's are bad, they are excellent for the money, but if you want more, and can pay more, then you get more with the Corsairs..
 
Last edited:
aegos are really overpriced! they were around ~100 quid now 150! this just put me of :) i looked at sp2500 but they were a bit over my budget, at the end i got the logitech z623 reviews are OK and satellites are ugly as hell but they will do the job!
 
Microlab Solo 6C's... they will destroy any <£150 2.1 set in music. They go down to about 50-60hz pretty well, so you shouldn't be missing out on much bass compared to the Logitechs.

If you absolutely need a 2.1 set then the SP2500's.
 
Completely agree with the above two posts.

Personally, I wouldn't go for the Aego's. Very good speakers, but £150 is too much for them now. They once cost £100, which was a fantastic price. There was far less alternatives back then, so £100 was an even better price. The Solo 6c's cost not far off half as much, but I would not be surprised if they are the better speaker. There are a few member who have found Edifier R1600T's sound better than the Aego's. Again, half as much.

As the above poster said, stump the extra and get SP2500's, or go for the 6c's and grab a decent sound card as well.
 
If you want proper speakers for music then you should be looking at bookshelf speakers and a separate amp. Not at 2.1.
 
Completely agree with the above two posts.

Personally, I wouldn't go for the Aego's. Very good speakers, but £150 is too much for them now. They once cost £100, which was a fantastic price. There was far less alternatives back then, so £100 was an even better price. The Solo 6c's cost not far off half as much, but I would not be surprised if they are the better speaker. There are a few member who have found Edifier R1600T's sound better than the Aego's. Again, half as much.

As the above poster said, stump the extra and get SP2500's, or go for the 6c's and grab a decent sound card as well.

The 6c's and R1600/R1900T's will surely beat the Aego's and even the SP2500 in terms of sound quality. Those 2.1 sets can't do midrange with <2-3 inch drivers. You'll have some big holes in the 150-300hz region and the sub crossover is going to be pretty bad.

The Edifier S730's are probably the only 2.1's I'd ever consider personally, but theyre really overpriced for what they are.
 
Last edited:
The 6c's and R1600/R1900T's will surely beat the Aego's and even the SP2500 in terms of sound quality. Those 2.1 sets can't do midrange with <2-3 inch drivers. You'll have some big holes in the 150-300hz region and the sub crossover is going to be pretty bad.

You might think that, but no.. the DSP and Bi-amping does a good job at creating a nice smooth transition, lots of warmth in the midrange, and exceptional seperation and clarity, I have a set of R1600T's for the kitchen which I've tried back to back with the corsairs, so I can only echo my experiences.

On all default settings, you are correct, the midrange is a little 'thin' (And noted in some critical reviews), but the POP EQ (I laugh at this, I'm normally against any EQ, but this just works) warms the midrange immensely, the EQ actually changes the crossover and frequency response intelligently, so it actually does make a worthwhile improvement, and has been noted in lots of reviews..

I normally have decent enough headphones (Senns/Beyers) and B&W DM603's and other B&W speakers, and I am still impressed with the SP2500's, that's all I can say.. Specs don't tell you the whole story..

The only consideration IMO is that these are designed to be near-field, so 1-2M listening distances e.g. at your desk, and these are mightly impressive.. but if trying to fill a whole room, and listening much further back, you would be better off with something 'larger'..

It's also worth noting that just saying the Solo 6C's go to 50-60Hz is meaningless, how can 1 woofer give you nice midrange and extended bass with any real control? I can safely say, the corsairs with discrete amps and digital crossovers just keep their composure even at max volume, with exceptionally clean bass and still exceedingly clear midrange.. My Edifiers don't do a great job when cranked up, so I wouldn't have too much hope for the 6C's, although I would love to give the 6C's a go, as I'm not brand loyal or anything, and I need a replacement for the R1600's..
 
Last edited:
For that budget I'd go with an amp and monitors something like gale monitors or even a pair of mordaunt shorts
 
You might think that, but no.. the DSP and Bi-amping does a good job at creating a nice smooth transition, lots of warmth in the midrange, and exceptional seperation and clarity, I have a set of R1600T's for the kitchen which I've tried back to back with the corsairs, so I can only echo my experiences.

You're wrong. Unless you cross the sub over at something ridiculously high like 200hz (that's not going to sound good), there IS going to be a frequency hole, and it IS there. It's impossible for the 3 inch drivers to extend down to around ~100hz in a relatively flat fashion (which should be in the region where the sub crosses over). The sats are going to steeply roll off in the 200hz reigion. No amount of EQing is going to fix that. http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story4&reid=251 This is exactly what I'm talking about.

I've heard the SP2500's, aswell as the R1600T's and R1900T's.... not heard the 6c's though. I can't understand why you'd think the SP2500's sound better than any of them though unless you're a total basshead.


It's also worth noting that just saying the Solo 6C's go to 50-60Hz is meaningless, how can 1 woofer give you nice midrange and extended bass with any real control?

What? :confused:

I can safely say, the corsairs with discrete amps and digital crossovers just keep their composure even at max volume, with exceptionally clean bass and still exceedingly clear midrange.. My Edifiers don't do a great job when cranked up, so I wouldn't have too much hope for the 6C's, although I would love to give the 6C's a go, as I'm not brand loyal or anything, and I need a replacement for the R1600's..

The R1600T's are near fields... they're not a Hi-fi set. If that's not your problem then something must be wrong with your R1600T's. Mine sounded fine at max volume when I had them. :)
 
Last edited:
You're wrong. Unless you cross the sub over at something ridiculously high like 200hz (that's not going to sound good), there IS going to be a frequency hole, and it IS there. It's impossible for the 3 inch drivers to extend down to around ~100hz in a relatively flat fashion (which should be in the region where the sub crosses over). The sats are going to steeply roll off in the 200hz reigion. No amount of EQing is going to fix that. http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story4&reid=251 This is exactly what I'm talking about.

I already know the frequency response of the speakers, I read that very article which actually persuaded me to give them a go!

The dip is at 150-200Hz, that's below midrange.. (300Hz-5Khz generally), if you read his impressions, he gives a very positive impression overall, noting lots and lots of positives and obviously it's not so strong points, but I came away with a very positive impression which as I said prompted me to go and try some SP2500's..


I've heard the SP2500's, aswell as the R1600T's and R1900T's.... not heard the 6c's though. I can't understand why you'd think the SP2500's sound better than any of them though unless you're a total basshead.
Again, I'll use Johnny Guru's impressions, there is plenty to like for these..
Corsair has done a fantastic job right out of the gate with these speakers. I am not easily impressed, but I certainly was this time when confronted by the sound quality coming out of a $200 set of "computer speakers." Do these compete with more expensive options? No, not really. But if all you want is a decent set of speakers at a reasonable price, this is what you want right here.



I don't understand your confusion, I'm suggesting that having a single woofer having to cover bass and midrange means some compromise in it's dynamic.. When the woofer is extending with good bass, how it then deals with reproducing the good accurate midrange, it depends on many factors like how it's damped, etc, etc.. Frequency response is a swept tone, it does not remotely hint at how they react to different types of music..
You can't say the midrange speaker size of the SP2500 is compromising things, and not think that having a single woofer covering 50Hz-5Khz isn't also going to have compromises..


The R1600T's are near fields... they're not a Hi-fi set. If that's not your problem then something must be wrong with your R1600T's. Mine sounded fine at max volume when I had them. :)
To be fair, I didn't think I'd suggested they wheren't, I was just confirming to the OP that the SP2500's are near field, and like any near field speaker (including the Rt1600's) they don't sound so good if trying to fill a room..

The thing is, when cranked up, the RT1600's start sounding a little strained, they are still better then just about anything else I've heard under £100, but you clearly haven't really back to backed them with the SP2500 which just holds it's composure so adeptly (for it's price)..

I still like the RT1600's, why do you think I run them in the kitchen? I am not going to buy rubbish, but this whole '2.0' must be better nonsense might be true in the higher price brackets, but quite frankly, down in the sub £200 region, no 2.0 setup remotely sounds anything like my moderately OK proper audio setup (Arcam/Dynaudio and Rotel/B&W), it lacks everywhere, at least for ME, the SP2500 has the controlled sub-bass, clarity and seperation that I am happy, despite technical 'holes' in the bass region..

The thing is, I buy a reasonable amount of kit, and I base it's performance relatively, If someone was talking sub £100 speakers, I've put the 6C's and RT1600's forward as recommendations in other threads.. but if you think they stomp all over the SP2500, you would be wrong.. they cost more, and luckily they also are worth the money, they don't touch my hi-fi kit, so I wouldn't tell someone to buy them if they had £300+ to spend either.

I think I come accross all wrong, I do like the edifiers, I would love to try the 6C's (and might just get a set for myself for Christmas for my spare room , setup), and I often recommend these are choices for people to try, so in reality I agree your speakers are very worthy.. however I can't lie and bring myself to hate teh Sp2500',s my ears just like them, and there are so many positive user reviews, I can count unhappy people on one hand..
 
Last edited:
Why not look at used?
I got a set of the Aego and sub from eBay about 18months ago for just over £70 and have been really pleased with them for that money.
They were local so I got to test them first, but worth a shot - there is a set on currently at £60.
 
I already know the frequency response of the speakers, I read that very article which actually persuaded me to give them a go!

The dip is at 150-200Hz, that's below midrange.. (300Hz-5Khz generally), if you read his impressions, he gives a very positive impression overall, noting lots and lots of positives and obviously it's not so strong points, but I came away with a very positive impression which as I said prompted me to go and try some SP2500's..

The rolloff actually starts at 250hz and the sub picks up at around 100-150hz. That's big, and it can definitely be heard... especially considering its the sub thats producing those ~150hz frequencies.... that's going to be horrible for music. Not to mention the steep rolloff after around 2khz, which again, can clearly be heard.

JG's opinion is pretty irrelevant to the point I'm making.

Also, 150-250hz is midrange (lower mids, but still mids)


I don't understand your confusion, I'm suggesting that having a single woofer having to cover bass and midrange means some compromise in it's dynamic.. When the woofer is extending with good bass, how it then deals with reproducing the good accurate midrange, it depends on many factors like how it's damped, etc, etc.. Frequency response is a swept tone, it does not remotely hint at how they react to different types of music..
You can't say the midrange speaker size of the SP2500 is compromising things, and not think that having a single woofer covering 50Hz-5Khz isn't also going to have compromises..

The distortion to the midrange caused by excursion would be EXTREMELY minimal (and inaudible in 99% of cases) if the speaker/amp construction is half decent. Do you have any proof to suggest otherwise?




The thing is, when cranked up, the RT1600's start sounding a little strained, they are still better then just about anything else I've heard under £100, but you clearly haven't really back to backed them with the SP2500 which just holds it's composure so adeptly (for it's price)..

As I said in my previous post, I've heard them both. The R1600T's sound better to my ears. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom