[TW]Fox;23397870 said:This is irrelevent though - the law makes no distinction as to the reason you wish to return it. You need not even provide a reason.
Which is why the DSR are stupid and need to be addressed.
[TW]Fox;23397870 said:This is irrelevent though - the law makes no distinction as to the reason you wish to return it. You need not even provide a reason.
Which is why the DSR are stupid and need to be addressed.
The op has stated he ordered the wrong size. It's like going into a high street retailer, saying 'I want xyz size, and I don't want to try it on' and then complaining when it doesn't fit.
Under DSR are you meant to get a refund for the postage costs you paid getting the item delivered of is that a separate service you are deemed to have consumed?
I. E. Should op get 34.99 + 4.99 back or just 34.99
Under DSR are you meant to get a refund for the postage costs you paid getting the item delivered of is that a separate service you are deemed to have consumed?
I. E. Should op get 34.99 + 4.99 back or just 34.99
Common sense would say that you only get the price of the item back, (because you don't get refunded your petrol or parking when going to a normal shop to change something!). Then again common sense and law don't often go hand in hand together!
The "spirit" of the DSR is effectively to give you similar rights to what you would have in a shop to inspect an item before you buy it.
Although DSR seems harsh, I think they are important for the consumer, as you physically cannot appreciate an item until you receive it.
The number of large retailers ignoring these regulations is, quite frankly, disgusting. Happened to me the other day, ordered a sensor for the car, which turned out to be the wrong one (although the same part number)
Me: I'd like to return xyz
Shop: Cannot refund, only exchange for faulty items blah blah.....
Me: DSR says otherwise (quote regulation)
Shop: Here is your return number....
They know they cannot operate this policy as an online company, yet choose to play dumb in order to discourage returns. Would trading standards be the people to refer these goons to?
[TW]Fox;23397870 said:This is irrelevent though - the law makes no distinction as to the reason you wish to return it. You need not even provide a reason.
However, if these trainers were modified in any way specifically for you (Nike once did a thing where you could have words printed on your shoes for example), you lose this right.
The op has stated he ordered the wrong size. It's like going into a high street retailer, saying 'I want xyz size, and I don't want to try it on' and then complaining when it doesn't fit.