How accurate is your speedo and how honest are you being about the speeds involved? I'd be quite surprised if a camera flash at an indicated 67 or 68 resulted in a prosecution. I'm doing barely 61/62 at that kind of indicated speed. If it was more like indicated 77/78 however.....especially if you had to.accelerate more than anticipated
Anyway, wait 2 weeks for a letter and take it from there, nothing that can be done now
According to my TomTom it's pretty spot on.
I'm being as honest as possible about the speeds. Although when I said ~70 I do mean more than 70 but no more than 75.
As such when I lifted when I passed (just in front of the camera) I was below 70 but above 65 with engine breaking (MX5 MK2's don't want to go that fast

)
The way I feel it played out is that the camera (on my side of the road) would have detected cars traveling above 68 but by the time I passed through I would be doing more like 65 or slightly less as I intentionally didn't break - just lifted my foot right off.
Ach, it's all pretty irrelevant anyway. As you say, wait it out and pay the consequences - just a crap Christmas present!
Was he in a better car than yours? Often it's hatchbacks and the like that try to overtake people when there is no need to! 40 in a 60 is hardly THAT slow.
Well, define better. Think it was a newer ford estate of some sort. Probably a more powerful engine than mine but I love my car to bits and is easily "better" than any other car on the road
I agree, 40 in a 60 isn't that slow at all - but 30 round EVERY windy section and speeding on the straights just made him to be a very unnerving person to be behind. I figured by passing it be able to maintain a higher average speed and thus make some distance.
The one time he was doing 40 on a straight rather than shooting off felt like a good time to just pass and be done with him - but obviously not.
But, lesson learned - hopefully I won't be coming back with the same story in the future!