Men are OPPRESSED

RDM said:
As a straight male the only right I seem to have lost in the last 30 years is the "right" to rape my wife. Which frankly seems like quite a positive thing.

So OP, what rights do you think you no longer have that all the "gheys" have?
Click to expand...

No deary, it wasn't rape, it was shut your mouth and gag on it you ghey biatch I've got implied consent.

1995 wasn't it?
 
matdom said:
Not talking about that, just public social issues that men seem to have less rights than others. just reading about women can down play a mans sexual power in the bedroom in the office, but when a man does the same he can fired for sexual harassment.
Click to expand...

You have a bedroom in your office?
 
The overall goal should be equality.

As long as the movements of each group don't over-step the goal (which I'd still argue that overall men have some ground ahead in many other areas) I'm fine with "equal rights groups".

Except for equal rights regarding child contact & in the courts generally in violence cases (men are assumed usually to be guilty easier than women & tend to get harsher punishments) - in most situations it's actually beneficial to be male.

The fact men commit suicide more I'd wager is due to our cultural attitudes towards men expressing emotions, I can imagine this society is pretty bad for a highly sensitive & emotional male - this you can blame male family members (poor examples) & social attitudes (the way men ostracise other men for expressing feelings).

It should be expected to have a negative impact to have just under 50% of the population who are almost emotionally retarded.

Anyway, not as simple as men being discriminated against or women overall - for each different category one gender is usually ahead.

Wages - Men
Education tailored to the genders - Women
Positions of power - Men
Social attitudes towards promiscuousness - Men (by a very long margin this one).
Contact for children - Women.

The goal should be to balance all of these out, egalitarianism is the only sensible approach.
 
matdom said:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegw...ity-of-suicide-why-are-men-at-such-high-risk/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/11/981112075159.htm
Click to expand...

First paragraph in your first link;

Forbes said:
In just about every country, men commit suicide more frequently than women, which is intriguing since women typically have higher (at least, reported) rates of mental health disorders like depression.
Click to expand...

That's probably why more is spent on women, perhaps?

Did that cross your mind at all?

Did you read it?

The real issue is the concern that men aren't reporting these problems, which is something else altogether not some sort of state ploy to prevent males from seeking help with mental health through gender spending discrimination policies.

I mean, paranoid much?
 
elmarko1234 said:
The overall goal should be equality.

As long as the movements of each group don't over-step the goal (which I'd still argue that overall men have some ground ahead in many other areas) I'm fine with "equal rights groups".

Except for equal rights regarding child contact & in the courts generally in violence cases (men are assumed usually to be guilty easier than women & tend to get harsher punishments) - in most situations it's actually beneficial to be male.

The fact men commit suicide more I'd wager is due to our cultural attitudes towards men expressing emotions, I can imagine this society is pretty bad for a highly sensitive & emotional male - this you can blame male family members (poor examples) & social attitudes (the way men ostracise other men for expressing feelings).

It should be expected to have a negative impact to have just under 50% of the population who are almost emotionally retarded.

Anyway, not as simple as men being discriminated against or women overall - for each different category one gender is usually ahead.

Wages - Men
Education tailored to the genders - Women
Positions of power - Men
Social attitudes towards promiscuousness - Men (by a very long margin this one).
Contact for children - Women.

The goal should be to balance all of these out, egalitarianism is the only sensible approach.
Click to expand...

A well reasoned and sensible post in GD. That sickens me to the very core.:p
 
elmarko1234 said:
The overall goal should be equality.



Wages - Men
Education tailored to the genders - Women
Positions of power - Men
Social attitudes towards promiscuousness - Men (by a very long margin this one).
Contact for children - Women.

The goal should be to balance all of these out, egalitarianism is the only sensible approach.
Click to expand...

i think women cheat more than men and the evidence is mounting up.
http://www.rte.ie/ten/2012/0923/pink.html
http://www.medicaldaily.com/article...ips-marriage-cheating-infidelity-adultery.htm
and is cheating down only to physical means because mental means women cheat more than men and the novel prove it,
 
matdom said:
i think women cheat more than men and the evidence is mounting up.
http://www.rte.ie/ten/2012/0923/pink.html
and is cheating down only to physical means because mental means women cheat more than men and the novel prove it,
Click to expand...

The evidence is mounting up?? :D

Pink has revealed that she thinks that women cheat more than men, but are more capable at not getting caught.
Click to expand...

Pink?

Evidence?

Troll off somewhere else now would be your best option.
 
Last edited:
matdom said:
I dont hate women, just think things are becoming one sided, when things should be equal, women men should be judged as a person on gender.
Click to expand...

Have you ever blocked a gay sexual experience form your memory? Were you debagged at school by a female bully? Did your mummy make you wear an Anne Diamond costume and have lesbo sex with her?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom