So the moon landing was faked!

When I started reading this thread, it was but 100 posts long. By the time I finished I, well, here I am. So it seems nothing has changed over the years. Anyone who thinks it was faked does not truly believe so, is trolling for argument's sake (quietly giggling like a little girl to themselves), but unable to provide any viable counterpoints to support their argument and drops out of the conversation. Always good entertainment. :)
 
Glaucus said:
The LM does have an ascent thrusters, using Aerozine 50 propellant, and N2O4 oxidizer, which burn with an almost invisible flame.
Click to expand...

Im not debating that it had thrusters (obviously it would need this to meet with the command module), but the initial takeoff was done via explosive as a failsafe to ensure it took off.

"The upper part of the Lunar Module shall be parted from the lower part and fly flap away. An explosion shall blast away the ascent stage from the descent stage, with explosive charges, which shall cut the links between the two stages"
 
Last edited:
Watch Apollo Zero :D


The argument that the lie was too difficult to cover up is incorrect. Look at the Manhattan project and other government projects, now declassified, that often involved 10000s of people and remained a secret for over 50 years. Not very difficult hiding the truth when you control the media and the education system and so on. Not to mention that when someone did come out with the truth, they were immediately marginalised and dismissed.

Apollo was nothing but a fabrication to convince the population of the planet that USA was number 1, it worked.

Bill Kaysing said that Apollo was a fake back in 60s before they even went to the moon, no one listened.

Here is his tribute website, http://www.billkaysing.com/
 
Last edited:
groen said:
Watch Apollo Zero :D


The argument that the lie was too difficult to cover up is incorrect. Look at the Manhattan project and other government projects, now declassified, that often involved 10000s of people and remained a secret for over 50 years. Not very difficult hiding the truth when you control the media and the education system and so on. Not to mention that when someone did come out with the truth, they were immediately marginalised and dismissed.

Apollo was nothing but a fabrication to convince the population of the planet that USA was number 1, it worked.
Click to expand...

Groen, your have commented in the past showing your idiocy in space flight in general, constant thrust needed, cant survive in orbit, etc etc.

Despite being proved wrong time and time again, you still post this video even after becoming an ocuk meme for idiocy in relation to the Apollo program.
 
RDM said:
The Manhattan Project was kept secret for 50 years? Really?
Click to expand...

What about Operation Northwoods, Operation Gladio, Operation Paperclip and so on, all massive projects that were kept secret for decades. The only point i am making is that the argument that the lie was too big too get away with is incorrect because they have gotten away with lies just as big before.
 
Metalface Mark said:
Groen, your have commented in the past showing your idiocy in space flight in general, constant thrust needed, cant survive in orbit, etc etc.

Despite being proved wrong time and time again, you still post this video even after becoming an ocuk meme for idiocy in relation to the Apollo program.
Click to expand...

I have never been proven wrong, I have just had non arguments thrown at me from all angles because people still like to hold on the childish idea that men went to the moon in 1969. They just like the idea of space flight and it kills them to accept that they were lied to on such a big scale that it is easier to continue believing the lie than it is to accept the truth.
 
deuse said:
The towers are 20ft in diameter and 432+ deep Nasa have been using them since 1959.
Click to expand...



And? That doesn't show how the hours of moon footage can be faked using them. 20ft is nothing, nor is the drop which lasts a few seconds. It's not even perfect low grav, it's an approximation.
 
Looking forward to gillywibble's report but not sure I can wait for another 6 days!

groen said:
I have never been proven wrong, I have just had non arguments thrown at me from all angles because people still like to hold on the childish idea that men went to the moon in 1969. They just like the idea of space flight and it kills them to accept that they were lied to on such a big scale that it is easier to continue believing the lie than it is to accept the truth.
Click to expand...

Don't you believe we are completely incapable of any type of space flight (man or machine) - struggling to to see how you have 'never been proven wrong'......
 
Last edited:
Metalface Mark said:
Im not debating that it had thrusters (obviously it would need this to meet with the command module), but the initial takeoff was done via explosive as a failsafe to ensure it took off.

"The upper part of the Lunar Module shall be parted from the lower part and fly flap away. An explosion shall blast away the ascent stage from the descent stage, with explosive charges, which shall cut the links between the two stages"
Click to expand...

No, know where in taht statement does it say the explosive charges provides the power.

http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/A11_PressKit.pdf
photojan21135239.jpg
 
groen said:
I have never been proven wrong, I have just had non arguments thrown at me from all angles because people still like to hold on the childish idea that men went to the moon in 1969. They just like the idea of space flight and it kills them to accept that they were lied to on such a big scale that it is easier to continue believing the lie than it is to accept the truth.
Click to expand...

lol.

What kind of response is that? You do know that men went to the moon in 1969, 1970, 1971 and 1972 dont you? You did see the Saturn V taking off (i guess you dont debate that, the largest vehicle ever to take off from earth, what is far fetched about building a rocket that size (something the Russians never managed to get into orbit, which is the hardest part off the lunar mission, getting the craft into space), once the stuff that is not in doubt is taken out of the equation, what is so hard to get your head around?

Have you read the mission logs and data from the missions? Do you still believe you need constant thrust in space? Do you still believe no human has ever gone into space as you said before?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom