I wouldn't say there's no point. That kind of efficiency would benefit everyone, the vehicles could potentially be achieving even greater MPG figures at lower speeds.
[TW]Fox;23639566 said:I'm not so sure - if it was geared to be very efficient at 100mph it would need an extra gear ratio to do it otherwise it'd be less usable at 70mph, surely?
I once had to rush back from London in mine up the M40 during a summer... sat 5-10 below that target speed and the trip average was 60.9mpg. Probably with a small diesel the car might do it. Lean burn goes out the window at that speed.
Hence potentiallyIf the vehicle needed to 'cheat' with gearing to hit the target then for sure it could be a very different story at other speeds. But if it was just a great engine and probably more importantly, a great body shape, then who knows. I wonder how a modern diesel would do in something like an old Citroen XM.
He has a Honda insight![]()
I wonder what the 535d would get.. 100 MPH is about 2350 RPM. Extra-urban is 52.3 MPG, so I reckon maybe 40-43 MPG. Bit far off the target though![]()
Gearing isn't cheating, it's a crucial aspect of a car's efficiency. To attain the best efficiency at a given speed, you gear the car so that the engine speed is at the best rpm for efficiency, having also accounted for torque/power required at a given speed.
You could have the greatest engine in the world, with the most aerodynamic body shape ever conceived by man but if it was geared to attain optimal efficiency at 50mph, then it'll still be crap at 100mph