So the moon landing was faked!

There's a fair bit of plain old guff in this one.

Round about 3:35, starts talking about the background to the display segments being the wrong colour and LCD's being invented. Total rubbish, They look like BCD (or similar) coded segments (the whole world used them a few decades back, prior to LCD's becoming popular) They look light in colour because the are simply missing semi-opaque covers that they shine through when assembled.

As for the memory ferrite memory cores I'm old enough to have seen them working.

And as for him saying the upside-down "U" not being a real symbol, just look up set theory. In the strictest sense it's not an operator, but is a mathematical process.

 
That has already been answered several times Jono8.

$100 billion dollar worth of reasons (not inflation adjusted, since inception)

An excuse or excellent cover for massive budgets for rocket research program. (develop intercontinental missiles, other military applications for technology)

To claim global technological superiority so they could use the phrase USA #1
 
gillywibble said:
Because they couldn't get through the Van Allen belt and still can't.
Click to expand...

So you are saying they faked it because it was scientifically impossible to do, correct?

This leads me on to my next question; What percentage of genuine physics professors/scientists from all around the world, believe it is impossible to send a man to the moon and that you can't get though the Van Allen belt?
 
groen said:
That has already been answered several times Jono8.

$100 billion dollar worth of reasons (not inflation adjusted, since inception)

An excuse or excellent cover for massive budgets for rocket research program. (develop intercontinental missiles, other military applications for technology)

To claim global technological superiority so they could use the phrase USA #1
Click to expand...

Interesting. So you are saying it wasnt because it was scientifically impossible?
 
No the reason for NASA was what I said. When it comes specific to why they didn't just fly to the moon, if they said they were going to, why instead go through all the "hassle" of faking it. Well I can assure you that actually going to the moon is far more hassle than faking it.

I always find with these big lies that permeate in culture of the population for extended periods of time, they often only required the initial lie to be set in place and it all self propagates and it becomes self evident eventually. The common argument, well all the scientists in the world believe it, why would you need more evidence. Is a result of this process where it becomes self evident.
 
groen said:
The common argument, well all the scientists in the world believe it, why would you need more evidence. Is a result of this process where it becomes self evident.
Click to expand...

You have proven, with that sentence, that you don't actually understand what the study of science actually is.
 
Jono8 said:
You have proven, with that sentence, that you don't actually understand what the study of science actually is.
Click to expand...

Study of science but worship of NASA

Dimple said:
And you think Russia would let them do that if the USA hadn't?
Click to expand...

Well you say russia but i doubt that you mean all the people in russia. How many people would then would not fall for the lie like the rest of the world in russia intelligence? Would they have any proof that apollo was fake? If they did how many people would have it? how long would the USA allow them to have that proof for. Would it be within the interest of specific russians or anyone for that matter to public with information disproving it. Would that information even be believed by anyone? and so on and on.

There very well may have been russians that knew the truth and told people in russia. I have never heard about it though. But I am sure there are skeptic all around the world at this point.
 
Last edited:
groen said:
Study of science but worship of NASA
Click to expand...

So your arguement is that every scientist, no matter their nationaility, worships NASA and will throw scientific theory out of the window should scientific evidence show that NASA were lying about the moon landings?

That is basically the entire crux of any conspiracy theory on the moon landings isnt it.

To think the moon landings were impossible, is to discredit the scientific community on a global scale...
 
Last edited:
groen said:
Well you say russia but i doubt that you mean all the people in russia.
Click to expand...

The people who mattered such as the Government and military would definitely have known if it happened or not and would have whistleblowed.
I have no doubt there are Russian CT's who don't believe that Sputnik was put up there let alone any kind of space race.
 
Dimple said:
The people who mattered such as the Government and military would definitely have known if it happened or not and would have whistleblowed.
I have no doubt there are Russian CT's who don't believe that Sputnik was put up there let alone any kind of space race.
Click to expand...

How would they have known any more than the canadian or british or even the personnel of the american government that were not directly involved. They all saw the same footage as everyone else. What gives you the idea that the russian government or intelligence would not have been fooled?
 
groen said:
It won't be the first time or the last time that the so called "scientific community" or best explained by the notion of the "scientific consensus" has been completely wrong or worse, has been fooled in to believing a lie.
Click to expand...

Any links, genuinely interested if it was lies or not knowing enough at the time?
 
groen said:
How would they have known any more than the canadian or british or even the personnel of the american government that were not directly involved. They all saw the same footage as everyone else. What gives you the idea that the russian government or intelligence would not have been fooled?
Click to expand...

Oh my word
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom