I don't get it.
An MP gets caught doing just doing what about every married couple would do if approaching a ban due to a build up of penalty points.
I'm not saying its a trivial issue. But come on I see my local rag every day filled with court reports of men driving without MOT, insurance, tax and get a £200 fine. Driver causes death by dangerous driving gets a suspended sentence.
A big WTF??? Speechless.![]()
What I still don't understand was why Vikcy Pryce dobbed him in (thereby implicating herself and she is now in the dock). I know he had an affair and can see why she'd want revenge but isn't this cutting your nose off to spite your face a little?
email exchanges between Sunday Times political editor Isabel Oakeshott and Ms Pryce from 1 March 2011 as they discussed how to publicise the crime.
Ms Oakeshott told her a "major two-part article" would inflict "maximum and perhaps fatal damage on Chris if you are prepared to be open", Mr Edis told the court.
Mr Edis said Ms Oakeshott told her it would fulfil her dual objective - "bringing Chris down without damaging your own reputation in the process".
Ms Pryce responded in email: "I definitely want to nail him. More than ever, I would love to do it soon."
Ms Oakeshott later replied: "The bottom line is that this story will bring Chris down if you are prepared to go on the record, with the minor risk this carries.
"I think you can make yourself out to be very much the honourable one, saying it has very much been on your conscience ever since, saying you knew it was wrong but you were bullied into it."
Mr Edis went on: "Mr Huhne was charged, he did resign, yesterday he pleaded guilty, he's not a cabinet minister any more. The plan worked."
The problem being the Journalist told her that there was 'minor risk' from doing this when in actual fact it seems that its likely she will be convicted.

Don't see why everyone is saying deserved/idiot/foot/haha etc. We'd all do the same if we were 3 points from a ban.
Also the journalist prompting that she was bullied into it, sounds like it could end worse for her than him to me.They will both get sent to prison I bet having read the latest BBC report she does sound like she wanted him taken down..
The problem being the Journalist told her that there was 'minor risk' from doing this when in actual fact it seems that its likely she will be convicted.
Why would you expect anyone who's been convicted of such a minor crime to be sent to a maximum security prison anyway?
Leave the bugger alone. Wasting a jail space on him is a complete farce. He has clearly sufferers as a result and I find it hard to believe he has not learned his lesson.
For those questioning how it could possibly result in a life sentence, perverting the course of justice isn't only relevant to misrepresenting a speeding offence, it could be giving a false statement regarding a murder. While when concerning a minor case it seems a bit harsh, the seriousness of the perversion will generally relate to what was done and the scale to which it prevented justice being carried out.
Don't see why everyone is saying deserved/idiot/foot/haha etc. We'd all do the same if we were 3 points from a ban.