• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Best time to buy a CPU now or wait?

Associate
Joined
26 Jul 2003
Posts
235
Location
South Wales
I have a old Q6600 that I want to replace, this CPU has lasted me five years but now it's time to upgrade.

I recently built my wife a system around a i5-3750k , it runs great and she's happy with it but being the douche bag I am I want something better for my system.

Is there anything better due to come out in the next few months, if not what are my options without spending silly money?
 
Might as well wait now for the new Intel Haswell processors due in a couple of months.

If you can't wait though then you can't go wrong with a 3570K Ivybridge platform.

Or see if you can get a second hand Q9450/Q9550/Q9650 if you want a bit of extra performance without splashing out on a new setup.
 
Will Haswell bring a new socket specification and range of motherboard / RAM types? Sorry if this has been asked before.
 
How much faster is a 3770k over something like a 3750k or a 2500k? Also does anyone have any information in terms of the new processors?

At the moment by poor Q6600 is overclocked to 3GHZ and I feel bad for it, the thing has been run pretty much 24/7 since I put the system together. I think my heatsink fan is also going as it's making a little noise like it needs oil or something :(
 
I think the cpu decision is quite easy nowadays. Both intel and AMD produce very capable chips. For general use and games i believe that everything above an i3 would be sufficient. Personally can't tell a difference between I5-3570k and a10-5800k in everyday use...
 
I think the cpu decision is quite easy nowadays. Both intel and AMD produce very capable chips. For general use and games i believe that everything above an i3 would be sufficient. Personally can't tell a difference between I5-3570k and a10-5800k in everyday use...
No disrespect for you yannis I know you love your A10 and that it's great for your light gaming on your HTPC, but if people really need CPU for number crunching or games that are CPU demanding, A-10, Core2, Phenom II, i3 etc simply don't have enough grunt. For example my main game at the moment is Guild Wars 2, even with my i5 2500K at 4.6GHz at times frame rate would drop to 30fps. I tried testing with no overclock, turbo boost disabled and ran the game with two cores (so basically a i3 with HT disabled), and frame rate can drop to as low as below 20fps. BF3 multiplayer is also known to be very CPU demanding as well...and Far Cry 3 is also very CPU dependent (when people got a fast enough graphic card for the CPU to scale with). So you can really generalise that faster CPU make no difference, just because the games you ran on your A-10 is not so CPU demanding.

On a seperate note I just got parts for a Bitfenix Prodigy mini-itx build...I did consider the possibility of A10, but went for the Pentium G2120 instead based on the fact that while Guild Wars 2 "can scale" up to 4 threads, most of the time it doesn't really use more than 2 threads so the G2120 would be faster and consistent performance wise, as well as I got a spare 9800GTX+ (which is tiny bit faster than the A-10's 7660D). CPU gaming performance wise there's no doubt that the A-10's CPU side is no weaker than the Pentium, IF games would use muti-core properly and use all 4 cores fullys...but unfortunately due to sloppy nature of game developers and with them keep shoving games using only 1-3 threads in our face, the Pentium become a more reliable performer, as it wouldn't suffer 25-50% or more of it performance going missing due to games not using 3rd and 4th core...
 
Last edited:
No disrespect for you yannis I know you love your A10 and that it's great for your light gaming on your HTPC, but if people really need CPU for number crunching or games that are CPU demanding, A-10, Core2, Phenom II, i3 etc simply don't have enough grunt. For example my main game at the moment is Guild Wars 2, even with my i5 2500K at 4.6GHz at times frame rate would drop to 30fps. I tried testing with no overclock, turbo boost disabled and ran the game with two cores (so basically a i3 with HT disabled), and frame rate can drop to as low as below 20fps. BF3 multiplayer is also known to be very CPU demanding as well...and Far Cry 3 is also very CPU dependent (when people got a fast enough graphic card for the CPU to scale with). So you can really generalise that faster CPU make no difference, just because the games you ran on your A-10 is not so CPU demanding.

On a seperate note I just got parts for a Bitfenix Prodigy mini-itx build...I did consider the possibility of A10, but went for the Pentium G2120 instead based on the fact that while Guild Wars 2 "can scale" up to 4 threads, most of the time it doesn't really use more than 2 threads so the G2120 would be faster and consistent performance wise, as well as I got a spare 9800GTX+ (which is tiny bit faster than the A-10's 7660D). CPU gaming performance wise there's no doubt that the A-10's CPU side is no weaker than the Pentium, IF games would use muti-core properly and use all 4 cores fullys...but unfortunately due to sloppy nature of game developers and with them keep shoving games using only 1-3 threads in our face, the Pentium become a more reliable performer, as it wouldn't suffer 25-50% or more of it performance going missing due to games not using 3rd and 4th core...


Dont worry, I am not any AMD, Intel or Nvidia fan :-)
Anyway, as I said before A10 is good for everyday use and I cant tell a difference betwwen my 3570K and A10 in everyday use (browsing, movies, office, some photoshop and some games).
I cant compare the 2 cpus in a objective way since I would need to transfer the 7970 from desktop to htpc and I don't have the time for these anymore.
However reading many posts in this forum, seeing my performance difference from i5-2400 to i5-3570K (none!!) and now experiencing the A10, I think that the CPUs don't play such a big role in about 70% of the apps.
I am not talking about fps, but perceivable performance.
 
Back
Top Bottom