Post office gave wrong amount for currency exchange

Any update with this?

Solicitor said she had to reverse the transaction because she was notified immediately (in legal terms within the same day). After painful week of collecting cash she reversed transaction, she was never compensated for travel costs or personal time wasting. As I said earlier, consumer got done over as always.

So there you are, for folks in the future, if notified of mistake on the same day then you legally obliged.
 
Solicitor said she had to reverse the transaction because she was notified immediately (in legal terms within the same day).

What?!?? This is absolute nonsense. Either there are some facts missing or the solicitor she spoke to is a complete idiot. Clearly there has been a unilateral mistake on the part of the PO but if your friend reasonably believed the rate offered to be valid then the contract is not void regardless of any protestations made.
 
I wonder if the same would count the other way round?

As I did say many times during the thread, yes. It's called honesty and common decency. If any place didn't then they aren't worth dealing with and should be avoided.

Good to see it's resolved OP, just a shame it had to cause you and your friend such an inconvenience, but then mistakes can happen both ways.
 
What?!?? This is absolute nonsense. Either there are some facts missing or the solicitor she spoke to is a complete idiot. Clearly there has been a unilateral mistake on the part of the PO but if your friend reasonably believed the rate offered to be valid then the contract is not void regardless of any protestations made.

It wasn't reasonable, as the price given was at least a thousand pounds more than anywhere else, something fishy should have been spotted there and then by both parties really before it went any further.
 
Solicitor said she had to reverse the transaction because she was notified immediately (in legal terms within the same day). After painful week of collecting cash she reversed transaction, she was never compensated for travel costs or personal time wasting. As I said earlier, consumer got done over as always.

So there you are, for folks in the future, if notified of mistake on the same day then you legally obliged.

Or, perhaps, rather than looking at is as being "screwed", simply do the decent thing and reverse the transaction straight away when the mistake is proven, and save the ever-mounting stress and pressure that she has nobody but herself (and possibly you) to blame for. This was little more than a smarmy money-grubbing crusade that could have been put to rest before it even happened.

At that point, the attitude of the staff (accosting a customer outside, etc.), could then be raised with management for a suitably amicable finish.
 
As I did say many times during the thread, yes. It's called honesty and common decency. If any place didn't then they aren't worth dealing with and should be avoided.

Really? So if you changed a load of money and then went back later that day and said you'd made a mistake in your calculations/you'd found a better rate elsewhere you think the PO would be perfectly happy to reverse the transaction?

I think it's more likely that laugh at you and tell you no chance.

Or, perhaps, rather than looking at is as being "screwed", simply do the decent thing and reverse the transaction straight away when the mistake is proven, and save the ever-mounting stress and pressure that she has nobody but herself (and possibly you) to blame for. This was little more than a smarmy money-grubbing crusade that could have been put to rest before it even happened.

I take it you haven't read the thread then - where the customer made multiple attempts to sort it out in a way which would limit the impact to both parties - only to be treated with hostility and accused of being a thief? In what twisted way do you even come to the conclusion that it's a "smarmy money-grubbing crusade" when a) There was never the intention (at least from the customer) to "rip anyone off" or however you want to phrase it, b) it wasn't the customer's fault in any way, shape or form, and c) the customer tried to resolve it amicably and was refused. The only "smarmy money-grubbing crusade" in this instance was on the part of the PO!

Why should the customer lose money because of the PO's mistake? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Really? So if you changed a load of money and then went back later that day and said you'd made a mistake in your calculations/you'd found a better rate elsewhere you think the PO would be perfectly happy to reverse the transaction?

I think it's more likely that laugh at you and tell you no chance.

There's a difference between a mistake giving you a much better rate than just simply not shopping around first :rolleyes:

I don't use that smiley very often.

If a mistake is made the Post Office has an audit trail, and the mistake can be rectified both ways. Knowing the system I would certainly be expecting a PO to correct mistakes as everything has to balance out, even the gains.
 
Last edited:
Much like the PO assistant not confirming that the rate they're giving the customer is the correct one then.

Glad we're in agreement over this. :)

The assistant was an idiot for not noticing the error true, but then not giving them a chance to rectify the error and just dancing off rubbing your hands together in glee at the mistake isn't on either.

I consider it not to dissimilar to picking up a purse that someone has just dropped, benefit from the idiocy and recklessness of someone not noticing they dropped it because they weren't paying attention or do the honest thing?
 
I don't think you read the thread, read it and apply common sense. She paid congestion charge to get there in the first place because of their fault, and again to reverse the transaction. Whether she did it straight away or not, that's £20 out of her pocket because of their mistake.

By the way you're accusing her of "smarmy money-grubbing crusade" while since the beginning she wanted to help the clerk out but was given options that would leave her at a monetary loss for their mistake. By monetary loss I mean travel costs. Then you also have to account for what this situation did on her credit score (she was notified of their mistake AFTER she put money into bank) and then you have to account that only third of the money they asked for would have been forgone if went to a different place and she was happy to hand it over to PO the whole time.

That's not what I get from the content of the thread. Did she offer, at any point, to simply bring the money back, have the entire transaction reversed (ie. both parties returned to their original positions), and her travel costs to be reimbursed on top as a courtesy? That would seem reasonable to me.

Rather, all I see is repeated rejections of the Post Office attempting to give alternate rates (which is completely unnecessary and should, indeed, simply have been rejected) and complaints that taking the money out of the bank again is just too much effort.

One would assume the easiest course of action would have been "Oh dear, mistake made": Next day, money out of the bank (same amount that went in), trot down to Post Office, speak with manager, offer to give back money for same amount given in original currency, as long as travel costs are reimbursed for the inconvenience as, admittedly, the mistake was not hers.

I don't see that approach having been made at any point, unless I've misread. Was the above the content of your friend's very first visit to speak to the manager? If it was, and he acted like the total knob you stated at first, then I apologetically rescind my earlier comment(s).

To outright refuse to merely reverse an incorrect transaction at which you are at a vast loss, however, is total management incompetence. The impression given is that your friend did not ask for this in the beginning, but impotently argued the point in order to keep as much as possible -- unfortunately against the stronger, jumped-up will of the PO manager.
 
Cool thread feel sad for the clerk about to lose thier job :( Mistake or not everyone has a bad day at the office.God knows what kind of personal issues they could have been dealing with,Cancer diagnosis on them or family member who knows.

You friend is guilty though under law i believe.If you realise it was a mistake and did not inform them then you are guilty.
 
Call your bank and ask them to get 5 figure sum ready in cash, see what they say and what it will do to your credit score. It's not a minor inconvenience. You have no idea what your'e talking about.

In an reply to his letter( instead of waiting for her to consult with solicitor as he said she would he tried to scare her into it) of theft accusation (which is a lie, she confirmed with solicitor this is civil matter and his accusing was simple scaremongering / attempted blackmail) she said she is willing to make it fair, arguing that full reverse she is at a loss and require compensation, he refused.

Again it's sicking that some people here try to put blame on her, she since the beginning wanted to help clerk save job and was willing to come to a far resolution where she as a customer that made abortively no mistake would not be at a loss. If you think that's "money grabbing" than you can go f yourself people.


The second paragraph was all I needed to know. He refused a reversal = utter waste of space. I'm sorry to hear that his obstructiveness has cost her in the end. :(

A salient point, easily reached without resorting to emotive outbursts. For what it's worth, six figure sums I've never had to pull from the bank. Pulled mid-five figures before with nary a problem, and admittedly never bothered considered the effect (or potential lack of) that it may have on a credit score. *shrug*

Anyway, you answered the point but I'd suggest you calm down and actually read what people are asking you, then offer a direct, succinct answer. Before doing anything else or questioning motives or intelligence, take a look at your own sig. ;):D:p



EDIT: And I'd most certainly agree about contacting the local press in this instance.
 
Last edited:
I consider it not to dissimilar to picking up a purse that someone has just dropped, benefit from the idiocy and recklessness of someone not noticing they dropped it because they weren't paying attention or do the honest thing?

its completely different to that tbh...

its more akin buying something that some employee has put the wrong label on and proceeds to charge you the wrong price for

i.e. you buy a TV for 399 that was supposed to be 599... pay for it, take it home, get contacted and told that it was a mistake, please drive back into town and pay the extra 200 you owe....

she didn't steal anything, the shop (post office) mispriced something (in this instance currency) and sold it to her at a lower price than they should have...

I'm a bit surprised that the solicitor advised her she was obliged to actually do anything... seems a bit dubious tb h...
 
if the post office offered to reverse the matter paying exactly back what she paid in the first place then that is fair.

forget about travel costs etc.

if the above was offered and the girl refused to accept it then she is someone i refer to as "sfn" ie someone who want something for nothing. i like to avoid such people.
 
Back
Top Bottom