I just go for higher priced stuff to show off *
Says the poster with a GIGABYTE WINDFORCE 3X GTX 680 in his sig

* Fixed
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I just go for higher priced stuff to show off *
Says the poster with a GIGABYTE WINDFORCE 3X GTX 680 in his sig
* Fixed
Marketing and Halo effects help a lot.
Its not that though. One is halo effect and you can see it with things like cameras,cars,etc. There are people who will buy the cheapest Mercedes even if it is worse than a cheaper Skoda?? Why?? Its got a Mercedes badge on it.
Secondly,marketing?? Putting their name on big titles for example is one aspect. The other is their use in commerical computing.
However,you should really should read up on the Nvidia Focus Group and their astroturfing which Nvidia uses(or used),to spread crap about competitors.
The whole AMD cards are unreliable and have useless drivers which people tend to sprout. OTH,where is all the noise about Nvidia having to spend $200 milliion on the bumps debacle?? I knew loads of people whose laptops died because fo that?? What about things like the driver update which borked cooling on Nvidia cards,etc.
Marketing and Halo effects help a lot.
Hardly, I bought this 2nd hand for £300 and way after release. You can't show off a GPU nearly a year old now.
It's Nvidia's flagship single GPU card, so still well worthy of a quick boast![]()
So the reason everyone who owns a nvidia 6 series card on these forums and elsewhere is because of halo and marketing effects?
Yes. And so they can brag.
![]()
I wish, I could well be swapping for a 7970 + cash.
Well if that's the case it's a pretty bold statement to make about all nvidia 6 series owner. How can they brag when AMD cards beat them?
So what you're saying is if you can't afford an I7 you shouldn't buy anything because it's not as good?
No that's not what my point is at all. If you can't afford something you go for the best you can get at the time. The thing is a lot of people can afford the better performance and will go for it. If price/performance was the only factor nobody would be buying 6 series nvidia cards.
Its not that though. One is halo effect and you can see it with things like cameras,cars,etc. There are people who will buy the cheapest Mercedes even if it is worse than a cheaper Skoda?? Why?? Its got a Mercedes badge on it.
Secondly,marketing?? Putting their name on big titles for example is one aspect. The other is their use in commerical computing.
However,you should really should read up on the Nvidia Focus Group and their astroturfing which Nvidia uses(or used),to spread crap about competitors.
The whole AMD cards are unreliable and have useless drivers which people tend to sprout. OTH,where is all the noise about Nvidia having to spend $200 milliion on the bumps debacle?? I knew loads of people whose laptops died because fo that?? What about things like the driver update which borked cooling on Nvidia cards,etc.
Marketing and Halo effects help a lot.
So the reason everyone who owns a nvidia 6 series card on these forums and elsewhere is because of halo and marketing effects?
Don't try that one on me. I updated the GK104 rumour thread for ages and have helped hundreds of people with builds on forums. I have had over 20 cards since 2004 with slightly more Nvidia ones.
Stop,trying to switch the subject by altering the question you asked.
You asked the question I gave you the answer. You don't believe me??
Look at Apple??
The world is not only a forum.
Because when they bought their cards AMD weren't even close. It took AMD a year to finally pull ahead.
So again Tahiti is a "stinker" because the GK110 which is a huge die,second generation product with loads of VRAM is faster??
Was the GK100 a "stinker" since Tahiti made it and the former did not??
So is the GK104 a "stinker" if the GK114 is faster then??
Was the GF110 a "stinker" since the GK104 was faster??
Was the G92 a "stinker" compared to the G80 since the latter had less declared transistors,was older older and still was faster??
Exactly nvidia were ahead on release, but no all these AMD owners knew that in the future their cards would outperform nvidias. It's nonsense saying it's marketing or halo effect when a lot of people bought their 6 series cards when they outperformed AMD's and were similarly priced on release.
If you'd read through the thread you'd see I'd already mentioned apple.
Exactly nvidia were ahead on release, but no all these AMD owners knew that in the future their cards would outperform nvidias. It's nonsense saying it's marketing or halo effect when a lot of people bought their 6 series cards when they outperformed AMD's and were similarly priced on release.
Well,you have not even bothered to read what I say and then complain at me when I mention halo advertising.
Do you even know about the Nvidia Focus Group??
They were a group of people who posted on forums.
They acted like concerned consumers/enthusiasts and always tried to put competitors(AMD,VIA,Intel) in a negative light.
However,for some reason they were exposed.
You know what was happening?? Nvidia was giving them free hardware.
So,in the end many forums forced them to disclose in their sigs,ie,that they are part of the Nvidia Focus Group and got free hardware for testing.
Yet,a number of these went on about how crap the competition to the point,a number were banned. One of them was a chap called Rollo,who was banned from forums.
So how come low end Nvidia cards outsell the much faster AMD ones?? This has been the case for years.
If don't understand the effect of Halo marketing then you need to go outside the world and have a look.
All you do is cherry pick what you want to read and then try to twist things your way. Its not going to work with me.
Half our stupid issues would not be here if that was the case.
I understand halo marketing fine but to suggest it's the main reason nvidia is doing better than AMD isn't fair in my opinion.
I don't believe that focus group thing at all either, and even so it would have very little effect as you said forums are only a small part of the real world.
So AMD has times when they have the fastest cards(HD5870 and HD7970),great price/performance,massive game bundles and yet they get outsold by Nvidia??
What the same Nvidia which had the bumps issues which cost them $200 million,and had whole laptop lines affected.
What about the Nvidia related driver problems like ones which borked cards,or even the stuttering issues that were related widely on their on forums.
The Fermi series which had very poor power consumption unlike the AMD alternatives.
Its not performance then. Not price/performance.Not even reliable hardware. Not drivers then. Not power consumption.
Is it because people "trust" Nvidia more than AMD?? Why?? Halo marketing?? PR??
.
Don't believe?? WTF?? The Nvidia Focus Group is famous on computer forums everywheres. Rollo was infamous and YES they had to put in their sigs.