A lot of reasons but mainly because it costs too much and it is not possible.
It costs more to put them all in prison, and why is treatment of mental health issues not possible?
A lot of reasons but mainly because it costs too much and it is not possible.
It costs more to put them all in prison, and why is treatment of mental health issues not possible?
How is putting an ill person into a prison a good thing? We don't do it with other types of illness.
It costs more to put them all in prison, and why is treatment of mental health issues not possible?
I imagine a vast number, if not the majority, of inmates have mental health issues.
You imagine correct a large percentage of the prison population has what would be considered mental health illnesses and quite specifically ASD. It should come as no shock that people who have a fundamental physiological inability to comprehend empathy and apply it will then struggle to fit into society. Ironically the percentage is around the same as found in "City" workers. Read into that what you will![]()
Even with those who don't have ASD, I still imagine there are many with issues or that a similar condition is created from their unbrining and lifestyles rather than being born with Autism.
If you watch breaking bad the transformation of WW is interesting because it somewhat parallels real life transformations. From my experience this happens at an age significantly younger than WW, but I have seen it.
You start off with the feeling of a lack of options. You do some things you feel you can justify to get by. You become numb to this, this escalates. Some people find their line, others pull back, some become the guy that knocks.
I know people like this. I don't know how to convince them to be different but I do believe if only they'd have some belief in themselves then many wouldn't feel the need to be the villain and we'd live in a much better country.
Which substantiates the talk a few weeks back about the prison in, I think Norway, where the emphasis was very much on rehabilitation and their success rate was substantially better than anything we can offer or anyone else.
Homosexuals are not above any other group of people, i find their acts incredibly offensive, they have to learn just like all other folk to tolerate a certain amount of criticism for their chosen lifestyles and acts. Everyone has different viewpoints on what is right conduct and what is wrong conduct, i personally view homosexuality as wrong conduct and i'm entitled to that worldview and opinion.not to mention incredibly offensive to homosexuals - homosexuality between two consenting adults causes no objective harm & isn't even a moral issue.
What are you on about?, all i said is i see things from my perspective and that both acts are unnatural and contrary to the natural relations between one man and his wife, from my point of view.I would read up on your history as it would suggest that on both counts you are wrong.
Both having been practiced by people through out recorded history.
Or at least as modern laws would describe as peadophile behavior.
Neither activity are things I find appealing but let's try and have the argument with actual facts.
Soft norwegian laws in some cases, take brevik for example, this murderer showed no remorse for his actions and made a complete mockery of a justice system, he should have been put to death immediatley.I think Norway, where the emphasis was very much on rehabilitation.
Breivik was a statistical outlier, one with the same kind of attitude as those in the thread (extreme right wing) - ironically.Soft norwegian laws in some cases, take brevik for example, this murderer showed no remorse for his actions and made a complete mockery of a justice system, he should have been put to death immediatley.
I'm not sure if you do? Maybe its not being clear though.
The whole pedophile label shall we call it is if a person either posses indecent images / acts inappropriately / abuses children.
Soft norwegian laws in some cases, take brevik for example, this murderer showed no remorse for his actions and made a complete mockery of a justice system, he should have been put to death immediatley.
No man made system works really, the state of this debauched world clearly shows this. Brevik knew what he was doing, he bult up a desire in his head and carried out his atrocities upon others, this is what free thinking can lead to.Breivik attitude(extreme).
You can't say a system which works significantly better than ours is worse because of one example, besides - he was first time offender.
Not vengeance, justice.Righteous vengeance eh?.
What are you on about?, all i said is i see things from my perspective and that both acts are unnatural and contrary to the natural relations between one man and his wife, from my point of view.
Not vengeance, justice.
Homosexuals are not above any other group of people, i find their acts incredibly offensive, they have to learn just like all other folk to tolerate a certain amount of criticism for their chosen lifestyles and acts. Everyone has different viewpoints on what is right conduct and what is wrong conduct, i personally view homosexuality as wrong conduct and i'm entitled to that worldview and opinion.
kedge said:No man made system works really, the state of this debauched world clearly shows this. Brevik knew what he was doing, he bult up a desire in his head and carried out his atrocities upon others, this is what free thinking can lead to.