Silly bint gets free boobs on the NHS

Yeah but the sun is subject to guidelines and laws, some random housewife who whips up such graphics is not. There is no checks done on randoms on facebook. If the sun print blatant lies about someone, they get taken to court. Facebook graphics? Not so.


They didnt give it to her for no reason, she lied to them and told them she was depressed because of her small chest.

Oh right so you know she wasn't actually depressed then? Maybe the Sun should start asking you how everyone feels before printing a story.
 
Oh right so you know she wasn't actually depressed then? Maybe the Sun should start asking you how everyone feels before printing a story.

She said it herself dude. Have you even read the article? :confused::confused::confused:

Here, let me quote it for you.

I was never depressed about my flat chest and wasn’t teased at school about it.

I just got emotional when I was explaining to my GP that I felt I couldn’t live a full life the way I was
 
So why couldnt she have saved up? :o

If she had decent sized breasts and wanted bigger then I agree she should have save up but being born with 0% breast tissue puts her (IMO) in the category to be helped by my tax money.

I am 100% convinced the media have altered her original story so that idiots on social media sites like OCUK and Facebook can tear into her.
I have a mate who went to the papers about his success story and when it appeared online it was a scathing attack on him and made him look really foolish.
 
Its written in the article in the original post...
Firstly, it's the Sun - so take it with a pinch of salt.

Secondly - from the same article.

"I could never go on holiday as I lived in terror of ever being seen in a bikini and could never set foot outside without a padded bra."

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...odels-giant-36DD-NHS-boobs.html#ixzz2OxGx2e35"

Seems like some selective quoting & twisted of words me thinks, but hey - if you believe what you read in "The Scum" the more the fool you.

The fact remains that the doctors said she had 0% breast tissue and was therefore able to have an operation on the NHS.

A big difference between a women with average breasts wanting watermelons & someone with no breasts getting some (then picking watermelons out of the selection).

If she had decent sized breasts and wanted bigger then I agree she should have save up but being born with 0% breast tissue puts her (IMO) in the category to be helped by my tax money.

I am 100% convinced the media have altered her original story so that idiots on social media sites like OCUK and Facebook can tear into her.
I have a mate who went to the papers about his success story and when it appeared online it was a scathing attack on him and made him look really foolish.
Exactly.
 
If she had decent sized breasts and wanted bigger then I agree she should have save up but being born with 0% breast tissue puts her (IMO) in the category to be helped by my tax money.

I am 100% convinced the media have altered her original story so that idiots on social media sites like OCUK and Facebook can tear into her.
I have a mate who went to the papers about his success story and when it appeared online it was a scathing attack on him and made him look really foolish.

Do you have any proof whatsoever for saying they altered her story? Considering she has been on TV shows and re-iterated the story from her own mouth?
 
She even says in the video the main reason was to follow in her dreams of being the next Katie Price...

Straight from the horses mouth so to speak.
 
Firstly, it's the Sun - so take it with a pinch of salt.

Secondly - from the same article.

"I could never go on holiday as I lived in terror of ever being seen in a bikini and could never set foot outside without a padded bra."

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...odels-giant-36DD-NHS-boobs.html#ixzz2OxGx2e35"

Seems like some selective quoting & twisted of words me thinks, but hey - if you believe what you read in "The Scum" the more the fool you.

The fact remains that the doctors said she had 0% breast tissue and was therefore able to have an operation on the NHS.

A big difference between a women with average breasts wanting watermelons & someone with no breasts getting some (then picking watermelons out of the selection).

You tell me not to believe something printed in the sun and then use something printed in the sun to make a point? :o

Was the lack of breast tissue the reason or was it the depression? Do we even know?
 
Did I mention breast implants? No.I just pointed out that often controversial surgeries can have a lower cost than long term treatment for conditions they fix. I used gastric band surgery as an example.

However the same could be applied to cosmetic surgery being a cheaper treatment than anti-depresants / counselling for depression.

Hope that clarifies the already clear point I was making.

Gastric banding is offered to morbidly obese people where added morbidity and early mortality are unquestionable. The healthcare costs if these people do not lose weight are also unquestionable.

Your suggestion is that the boob lady somehow falls in the same category and that implants will have an analogous efficacy to a gastric band. That's what I disagree with.

Her condition isn't going to give her diabetes or coronary artery disease. Her problem is that she has an excessively low opinion of her body and feels sad about it. There are circumstances where cosmetic surgery is appropriate but the reason why people took exception here is because she got pr0n boobs and is plainly promoting herself as a glamour model wannabe
 
So you really think that's true? The Sun add a lot of things to articles that are false and the girl wouldn't stand a chance against them in court arguing otherwise.

They do not fake quotes. Say what you want about them but they simply cant do that and get away with it.

If they misquoted her, why hasnt she said a single thing about it? No need to go to court, just a simple denial or statement saying what they printed was untrue. Theres nothing.

You are letting your dislike of the sun blind you here.
 
They do not fake quotes. Say what you want about them but they simply cant do that and get away with it.

If they misquoted her, why hasnt she said a single thing about it? No need to go to court, just a simple denial or statement saying what they printed was untrue. Theres nothing.

You are letting your dislike of the sun blind you here.

The Sun will have paid her for the story, you really think she'd be bothered about parts of it being false or exaggerated?
 
Ugly posts by Ugly people. :(


I'm up for some fun & Banter but lines have been crossed.
 
You tell me not to believe something printed in the sun and then use something printed in the sun to make a point? :o

Was the lack of breast tissue the reason or was it the depression? Do we even know?
I'm pointing out that the article is twisting words multiple times & seems to be paraphrasing.

You factually stated "she lied to her GP about being depressed".

Where does it say "I lied to my GP about being depressed".

It says she wasn't bullied & wasn't depressed.

It says she was emotionally distressed.

Depression does not equal being emotionally distressed.

The fact remains, this story is yet another pathetic article in a rag magazine for retards - designed to get the stupid public enraged.

Heres the same quote from the mail...but i guess they are liars too right?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-foot-Outrage-NHS-provides-36DD-implants.html
You link the dail mail like it's somehow more respectable.

1555263226_lol_xlarge.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom