Silly bint gets free boobs on the NHS
- Thread starter peterattheboro
- Start date
Plenty of people will complain about NHS fertility treatment in a thread on that topic. Pretty sure there was one recently.
Well, it does change it somewhat.
Person A = having a normal sized penis asking for a massive one to get into porn.
Person B = having no penis & asking for a massive one to get into porn.
Person A doesn't need a massive penis to be happy, just at least a functional one.
Person B needs a penis either way & when given the choice picks to have a massive one.
If you didn't have a penis & got to pick from a line-up - would you take the pecker?.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Dec 2010
- Posts
- 7,438
Is there any nude photos of said silly bint? Checked the Sun today and nothing.
But that's not what she did - she only needed them to get into glamour modelling. That was, by her own admission, why she did it.
Yes, according to the UN it is.
You can google for them. They did a terrible job on her boobs though.
Well, she didn't only get one to get into glamour modelling from what was quoted - it was mentioned she didn't feel comfortable going out without a padded bra, dreaded going on the beach & found it distressing.
She met the medical criteria to have the operation, what she chooses to do after should be no concern of ours.
Nope, because that is MY choice.
Tax is money taken from others - i.e for a proportion of the year they are working as unpaid slave labour. Now, if we chose to do this, then one might think that such slavery at least should produce something to the "common good".
If you choose to put your time into creating value in order to obtain a PC, that is your personal choice. But forcing others to work a silly amount of hours just so you can have something that you WANT (not need), is a whole different thing.
*No personal attacks*
She met the medical criteria by claiming she was depressed by it, knowing that it would help the case, not that she was actually depressed.
Unpaid slave labour? - get a grip, the irrational way in which you speak about things only highlights your unbalanced views.
Define need?, need as in to stay alive as you suggesting? - so let's say, a burn victim - do they need reconstructive surgery?.
Returnee?
Can you show me where she claimed she was depressed? - from what I've read she met the medical criteria by having no breast tissue.
http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk
To have breast implants funded via the NHS, the appearance of the woman's breasts needs to be causing significant psychological distress. Possible reasons for significant distress may be due to: severe underdevelopment - distress, not depression.
a congenital abnormality - meets this criteria.
very unevenly sized breasts - doesn't meet this criteria.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Completely ridiculous.
The NHS didn't need to give her 36DD's they could have offered her a normal size for a normal girl. Being that's size they are just going to cause issues down the line and need resurgery etc,
Good job she didn't go in for facial surgery I doubt they could have found a scalpel sharp enough to cut through that slap.
The NHS didn't need to give her 36DD's they could have offered her a normal size for a normal girl. Being that's size they are just going to cause issues down the line and need resurgery etc,
Good job she didn't go in for facial surgery I doubt they could have found a scalpel sharp enough to cut through that slap.
I think thats more of a case that your right to have kids should be protected from the state as opposed to the state having to pay to ensure you can have them.
@elmarko - I'm ugly, fat, short, and have early stages of MPB. Please send me money so I can have these things fixed because I'm feeling a tad down about it right now.
Wrong in so many ways, she should have either learned to live with what god gave her or save up and pay for them with her own money. I bet there are many women out there myself included who would love to have slightly bigger breasts and probably have the odd down day about it, but they don't go to the doctors and get it done at the expense of hard working people.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
I think thats more of a case that your right to have kids should be protected from the state as opposed to the state having to pay to ensure you can have them.
100%. the NHS shouldn't have to fork out for continuous IVF treatments. It's completely OTT. The NHS should be there to help in case of emergency etc not dr lovedup feelgood's surgery.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
But why would you need bigger breasts?
She says it in video interview someone posted earlier on. She also says her primary reason was to get into glamour modelling. Distressed, depressed whatever - she put glamour modelling above all else, even her mental health.