The 'facelift' everyone is referring to is invisible unless you're a nerd. They didnt change the front lights or anything silly, I seem to recall it was rear lights and thats it from exterior. The important aim for me would be 2004 model onwards as you avoid the bottom end issue associated with earlier cars, thought to be fair not something that effects many but it was a recall issue back in the day. The engine is very solid bar the odd Vanos issue (my first one went at 42K miles) but rear springs are an issue and need checking. I'd budget 10K upwards for forget the idea personally and I would want a full service history too, its important.
The 'facelift' everyone is referring to is invisible unless you're a nerd. They didnt change the front lights or anything silly, I seem to recall it was rear lights and thats it from exterior. The important aim for me would be 2004 model onwards as you avoid the bottom end issue associated with earlier cars, thought to be fair not something that effects many but it was a recall issue back in the day. The engine is very solid bar the odd Vanos issue (my first one went at 42K miles) but rear springs are an issue and need checking. I'd budget 10K uupwards for forget the idea personally and I would want a full service history too, its important.
The 'facelift' everyone is referring to is invisible unless you're a nerd. They didnt change the front lights or anything silly, I seem to recall it was rear lights and thats it from exterior. The important aim for me would be 2004 model onwards as you avoid the bottom end issue associated with earlier cars, thought to be fair not something that effects many but it was a recall issue back in the day. The engine is very solid bar the odd Vanos issue (my first one went at 42K miles) but rear springs are an issue and need checking. I'd budget 10K upwards for forget the idea personally and I would want a full service history too, its important.
They also have a longer bit above the number plate. It is very easy to spot the difference.
A few pages back the thought of £475 road tax scared the crap out of you, how fast do you think you'll burn those 19" tyres down for example or even the massive insurance hike?
You realise you are buying a car with the running costs of a today £55k car right? It's not an £8k car. You can easily be looking at a £2k bill if you have an issue, tyres are 900 for a set if you buy quality and fuel consumption is circa 22-24mpg.
Nobody is frustrated, more amused that someone who has decided that £200 a year extra tax is a significant enough cost to write a car choice off thinks an ageing M3 is a perfectly sensible financial option instead.