Silly bint gets free boobs on the NHS

Just saw the topless pics

How can they spend 5k on that? the incision isn't even the new method around the nipple ROFL. This is what I meant when I said getting the NHS to do them at all was a mistake.

NHS = tesco value.

edit: Just noticed she's northern. What a package. Dodgy boobs and a rough northern accent. Probably necks lager like a lad too. Do not want.
 
Last edited:
Just saw the topless pics

How can they spend 5k on that? the incision isn't even the new method around the nipple ROFL. This is what I meant when I said getting the NHS to do them at all was a mistake.

Different women require different methods. Sometimes unders, sometimes overs. Sometimes incision can be up by the armpit, sometimes underneath. The nipple can be used but it depends if it will be moved or altered as well.
Her scars will heal in time. Arguably, scaring directly on the nipple is more unsightly.

To be honest, the pics of her topless show they aren't actually that large. I'd say 36DD was being generous. She's clearly wearing a super push up bra for the clothed shots for papers etc.

To be honest, if the NHS are going to give someone a boob job, they may as well shove a couple of decent sized ones in whilst out for the count. So I think the debate should be, should she have had it done at all. Personally I think not. If someone is depressed about their breast size, cough up and pay to have them done or go without, like everyone else does. Why should she be different?
 
The girl did something the majority of us find distasteful, thus she becomes a prime target for abuse. We make light of the situation so anyone else who steps out of line knows whats going to happen. Thats how society has works and how it's always worked.

Not that I always agree with the method, especially when it's used to attack something that really doesn't affect you such as homosexuality, but I think the hating is completely legitimate in this case. She turned on the waterworks to get a hand out and she's basically robbed society.

I supposed we could cut off her hands (of boobs) or attempt to find a way to throw her in prision but we're British, we'd rather take the **** than hand over those types of powers to the establishment anyway.

Meh, theres always a white knight on a crusade. The woman deserves it.
 
No, just that intelligent, clever, quirky, dry humour is funnier than crass formulaic or Benny Hill humour.

Answered this?
TV is pushed at a range of paid subscribers in the hope of making a percentage happy, a forum is a effort to make a social group amongst like minded people (4chan for the *****, OC for clever geeks)

Blocking people is childish, I posted in this thread why shouldn't I look at it? Like I said, forums are a group effort, you get out what you put in. TV is passive and really a bit irrelevant now.

I still refute that any of these people posted in order to be humourous, that's just a convenient fabrication to excuse their boorish nature. Not unlike 'he pinched her bum because it was funny and the humourless cow didn't laugh, she must be a lesbian, and with a face like that, gagging for it too' - and whoosh, straight back to the 70's clubs.

I'll stick with magnolia, kwerk and the debate offered by all the clever people in here, the 4chan crowd can get lost.

We have a whole raft of politically correct dribble that we can't even hint at for fear that someone, somewhere might construe it as mildly pouting in their general direction.
I'm merely objecting to the ongoing bandwagon of crass comments here, posted purely with the intention of saying something nasty about someone involved with a touchy subject.
Equally it's the insidious nature of the comments - not just at her possible stupidity in involving the press, her stuck on boobs or her tacky choice of career, but simply her face - because as men well all know that making a comment about a girl's face (or even a spot) is the one thing that is absolutely guaranteed to hurt. Therefore it is the one thing a decent bloke should avoid commenting on.


I think I've covered what I wanted to say, and I'd really rather watch a film now? :)

So everyone that uses 4Chan is a "****"?

That isn't very nice.....you could offend someone using that sort of language.

On a serious note though, I think your interpretation of the 'banter' in this thread as some sort of abhorrent abuse is well of the mark and I think you should take this forum ,especially gd , a little less seriously.

Your view that insults and mickey taking are ok, as long as it is done by an intelligent
and well educated person on a tv show are also very odd.

But then I am a huge fan of Jeremy Clarkson so I'm not sure we will ever see eye to eye!
 
You guys know a lot about the incision techniques in breast enhancement...


An awful lot...

I carry out at least 100 breast augmentations annually amongst other surgical procedures. In fact, Josie Cunningham came to me specifically, but I had to turn her down as I was patching up Jodie Marsh that week.
 
Your view that insults and mickey taking are ok, as long as it is done by an intelligent
and well educated person on a tv show are also very odd.

But then I am a huge fan of Jeremy Clarkson so I'm not sure we will ever see eye to eye!

Are you trying to say Clarkson isn't intelligent and well educated?
 
I think your interpretation of the 'banter' in this thread as some sort of abhorrent abuse is well of the mark
Banter is funny though, blokes all ganging up to call a girl ugly is just awkward and depressing.
Your view that insults and mickey taking are ok, as long as it is done by an intelligent and well educated person on a tv show are also very odd.
Well it's like Sandi Toksvig vs Freddie Starr, both are comedians but only one is actually funny. You'll note that one of those uses mockery, the other insults - which was my point.
But then I am a huge fan of Jeremy Clarkson so I'm not sure we will ever see eye to eye!
Me too, sorry :o

If so, she can go **** herself.
I was expecting a bit more of a Christian viewpoint really, something about immodesty or something? :confused:
 
Me also being a fan of Clarkson?
well 'fan' is pushing it, but I like his un-PC'ness.

He is one of the most rude and misogynist people in the public eye!

How is the below any different to what people are saying in this thread, other than he has actually "abused" a collective group of people

http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012...-clarkson-brought-facial-prejudice-to-a-head/

"You know sometimes you meet someone and they have a growth on their face and it is bigger than their face… one of those really ugly things”. The audience laughed, and the so-called joke was included in the Thursday repeat. It was an odious TV performance.

"Further into the joke he said the car looked like something you wouldn’t speak to at a party unless you were looking at something else"

It seems to me like you are fine with celebrities or "intelligent" people making crass and rude jokes about people, but not people on this forum.
 
He's quite clearly not putting himself above other people by acting like a buffoon all the time. He's also repeatedly said he doesn't believe the things he says.

The spirt in which things were said in here was entirely different, I don't get why you are flogging this horse on behalf of a bunch of bores. Is the right to be churlishly nasty about random teenagers something that has to be enshrined in the forum etiquette? It's like you are sticking up for the right to be an utter ****.
 
Last edited:
He's quite clearly not putting himself above other people by acting like a buffoon all the time. He's also repeatedly said he doesn't believe the things he says.

The spirt in which things were said in here was entirely different, I don't get why you are flogging this horse on behalf of a bunch of bores?

I am just interested as to why you have taken all the silly comments in this thread so seriously, when you know, as well as i do, that 99% (if not all) of the people making those comments will be making them for exactly the same reasons that people like Jeremy Clarkson,Frankie Boyle,Ricky Gervais and Jimmy Carr do.

If you don't like that style of humour, then that is fine, but i don't see why you should come into this thread and try to goad the mods into doing something about it.

You know full well that Jeremy Clarkson would make exactly the same sort of comments about this woman if he were in this thread. :p
 
I am just interested as to why you have taken all the silly comments in this thread so seriously, when you know, as well as i do, that 99% (if not all) of the people making those comments will be making them for exactly the same reasons that people like Jeremy Clarkson,Frankie Boyle,Ricky Gervais and Jimmy Carr do.
I don't lump Clarkson in with those three, in fact Gervais shouldn't really be there either.

If you don't like that style of humour, then that is fine, but i don't see why you should come into this thread and try to goad the mods into doing something about it.
Again on this? Nobody posted about her face to be "funny", that is such a ridiculous assertion.
You personaly might find their pointed dislike of this girl to be amusing, as pointing at people having a rant is often amusing, but that doesn't change the fact that they wanted to post something nasty because that encompasses their feelings towards her.

Nobody intended their post to be funny or ironic or a satirical commentary on post Dickensian values, or a modernist diatribe against celebrity worship in a secular age or whatever hilarious BS you are trying really hard to make this out to be - they were just ***** sl@gging off some vacuous girl because they hate her. That is all this ever was.

The point about the mods is that they have one set of values for anything PC and another set for cases like this. The fact that threads like this make OC look like the **** club is being ignored.

You know full well that Jeremy Clarkson would make exactly the same sort of comments about this woman if he were in this thread. :p
He creates the charactor of an overgrown child from which to deliver such lines, nobody else in here purposely makes themselves out to be idiots, so what they say has to be taken at face value.
 
I don't lump Clarkson in with those three, in fact Gervais shouldn't really be there either.

? They are all people who do and have made fun of people's looks. I'm not lumping anyone in with anything. I am just talking about people, some of them that you seem to enjoy watching on TV that constantly do the same as some of the people on this thread.

Again on this? Nobody posted about her face to be "funny", that is such a ridiculous assertion.

I think you will find it is actually a very accurate assertion. Again, you are taking what people say on this forum far too seriously. Everyone likes to be a comedian ;)

You personaly might find their pointed dislike of this girl to be amusing, as pointing at people having a rant is often amusing, but that doesn't change the fact that they wanted to post something nasty because that encompasses their feelings towards her.

But as i have said already, you think it is OK for someone like Jeremy Clarkson to say rude/nasty/offensive things about people?

Nobody intended their post to be funny

Again, wrong.


The point about the mods is that they have one set of values for anything PC and another set for cases like this. The fact that threads like this make OC look like the **** club is being ignored.

So your solution is for no one on this forum to ever be allowed to say anything bad about someone elses appearance?

nobody else in here purposely makes themselves out to be idiots, .

Hm, i think that perhaps highlights your lack of understanding on how a lot of people project themselves on this forum.
 
Back
Top Bottom