DWP seeks law change to avoid benefit repayments

Latest from Boycott workfare.

Workfare: we are the opposition!
Posted: March 28th, 2013 | Author: editor | Filed under: Action report | No Comments »


Edinburgh’s actions shut two workfare exploiters down!
Last week thousands of people around the UK took action against workfare, and it’s already had results! Superdrug have declared that they are pulling out of workfare. The pressure on those charities and businesses still profiting from unpaid work stepped up massively. Online actions saw Debenhams decide to cancel a live Facebook Q&A, and the Salvation Army respond to visits to its headquarters and online pressure by claiming “workfare does not exist”!

Action on high streets across the UK saw shops that use workfare closed down, letters delivered to workfare users, and chalking appear on the street pointing out workfare profiteers. Read more about actions in Edinburgh, Bristol, London and Nottingham – just a few of the many cities that took part in the week of action.

It was a week where, with the exception of only 57 MPs who voted against it, both the Government and the Opposition supported a bill which denied justice to 300,000 people. They rushed through a retroactive law to rob £130 million from people who were due repayments of unlawful benefit sanctions. Shamefully, the Labour Party are now lying to justify their actions: pretending that people could not have appealed wrongful sanctions without the bill; and that no sanctions were possible without it.

It was a week where what everyone already knew was revealed: Job Centre staff have targets to sanction people, to make thousands destitute. 827,660 people were sanctioned between April 2011 and October 2012, and the number of sanctions for single parents has increased 1500% in four years. Some job centres have even offered easter egg incentives to advisors who ruin the most lives.

It was a week when Christians boosted the campaign by mobilising with Christianity Uncut to challenge charity workfare, where one in five people are sanctioned. While the Salvation Army boast that they are helping sick and disabled people to “emancipation through employment”, stories have emerged of what this can mean in practice. One person contacted us to tell their brother’s story:


My brother was sent to work at the Salvation Army shop. Whilst working in the shop, he picked up scabies. This was diagnosed by his doctor who told him not to go back there. He was sanctioned by the DWP for 2 months. Up until last year this man had worked for most of his life, losing his long term job after being laid off. This has to stop.

We would like to thank all those who have taken part to help stop people facing the impossible choice of workfare or sanctions.

The campaign is growing and you are making the difference. In the last month, your action means nine more organisations will no longer take part in workfare: Sense, PDSA, Shoe Zone, Wilkinson’s, Superdrug, Capability Scotland, Sue Ryder and the Red Cross have all pulled out. The Children’s Society has pledged “All volunteering at The Children’s Society should be done by choice and under no obligation from any other agency.” Elsewhere we saw a housing association pull out of the Work Programme bringing it yet again a step closer to collapse.

And it doesn’t stop there. Yesterday, campaigners in Edinburgh let Iain Duncan Smith know what people think of his ‘welfare reforms’. Liverpool have already called a week of action in April. The charities and companies profiting from workfare still need to hear from you. When you win, you win for others so keep up the great work and lets keep winning!

http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=2381#more-2381
 
Easter for some. Workfare for others.
Posted: March 30th, 2013 | Author: editor | Filed under: Name and shame | No Comments »


21 workfare workers in one Homebase store. (Photo: Sebastian Ballard)
Perhaps eager to claim a chocolate Easter egg bonus, Job Centre staff in Finsbury Park (London) this week congratulated each other for securing 21 workfare placements in a single Homebase store in Haringay. This is a store that is not advertising for workers: more evidence that workfare replaces paid work.

Last year the boss of Home Retail Group – who also own workfare exploiters Argos – was paid £1.1 million. You’d think they could afford a living wage for the people working in their stores.

Homebase have responded to the spontaneous public reaction calling for them to quit the scheme by deleting tens of comments on its Facebook Page, then disabling comments, then promising a statement on Tuesday, then taking the page down, then resurrecting the page free of any mention of workfare, then taking the page down again. It’s clear our actions are having an impact.

Let’s keep going until everyone working in their stores is paid!

Contact Homebase:

On Facebook (if they bring their page back again): facebook.com/homebase
On Twitter:
By email: [email protected] or [email protected] or [email protected]
By phone: 0845 077 8888 or 0845 601 6911

Or contact the company they are owned by: The Home Retail Group

http://www.boycottworkfare.org/
 
How do you end up on this workfare thing?

I have friends who had 'placements' but got paid minimum wage for six monthly terms.

My girlfriend got a 6 month contract with a charity getting minimum wage for 30+ hours and after finishing college is looking at getting another one of these for now. They also gave her £64 towards getting clothing for interviews at Matalan....

I would struggle to live on JSA, this week I'll have spent what you get per month :(

Turns out she did do a workfare thing as she worked in the red cross and the wisegroup(lol) for around 6-8 weeks she said.

Fun times.
 
Scientists go where the money is, often starting off with conclusions and working backwards, handpicking results to suit.

That's a pitifully retarded statement.

If that's what they did non of their discoveries, theories, products or processes would be useful/functional and would therefore be utterly worthless and so no money.

if what you said was true then companies would just hire psychics to do their fake research, why waste money on a very expensive professional when any liar would do?
 
Tesco Called on Government To Scrap Benefit Sanctions As Profits Dipped

Posted on March 29, 2013 by johnny void | 65 Comments


Tesco claim to have called on the DWP to scrap benefit sanctions in a response to a letter asking them about their use of forced, unpaid workers.

In a humiliating snub to Iain Duncan Smith, the company set up their own workfare scheme outside of the Jobcentre system last year. Tesco say that this scheme is entirely voluntary but add in the letter: “I appreciate your concerns and can advise that Tesco have suggested to the Department of Work and Pensions that, to avoid any misunderstanding about the voluntary nature of the scheme, the risk of losing benefits that currently exists should be removed.”

Now unless Tesco are fibbing, if their scheme is outside of the various DWP workfare schemes, then it should be entirely voluntary. The statement suggests that in order to avoid confusion Tesco would like to see all benefit sanctions removed. Tesco want free workers without the bad PR, and have no doubt calculated that with youth unemployment soaring, they can easily manipulate young people into working for free. The company have even stated that “going forward” young people “accepted for work experience with Tesco” will have the option of being paid minimum wage and those that complete a placement successfully will be given a real job.

Yet just 300 of those who worked unpaid at Tesco have been employed, despite around 1,400 people having ‘donated’ their time to support the company. What Tesco really seem to be saying is that occasionally we might employ someone without making them work unpaid first. How ****ing big of them.

These is another reason why Tesco might oppose benefit sanctions however. Whilst Tesco are far from the cheapest shop, they are often the biggest in areas where there are high numbers of benefit claimants. A significant chunk of the UK’s social security budget ends up in the pockets of Tesco shareholders – along with small local businesses and the utilities companies – something George Osborne seems to have forgotten.

Every family queuing at a foodbank is a family that didn’t shop in Tesco that week. The latest available figures suggest 680,000 benefit sanctions were handed out in the first 10 months of 2012. During the same period Tesco’s profits fell for the fist time in 20 years.

The bedroom tax, council tax benefit changes, housing benefit cuts and the raft of other vicious measures set to impoverish the already impoverished are also all about to begin. These changes are big enough, and will affect enough people, that Tesco, along with ASDA, Poundland, Lidl, Aldi and other discount retailers are waking up to the fact that if their core customers have less money, then so will they.

Tesco have already taken steps to mitigate this problem. Shortly before Christmas last year Tesco teamed up with the The Trussell Trust “to launch the biggest ever nationwide food collection for people in crisis.”

Customers in Tescos around the UK were invited to donate an item of shopping bought at the supermarket to their local Trussell Trust foodbank. The company set up collection points in many of their stores to make this easier. Claimants shouldn’t be fooled by this apparently charitable gesture. Tesco make no real secret of the fact they are a bunch of *****. They are simply attempting to ensure that if people are getting their food from foodbanks, then that food was bought in Tesco first.

Join South London Solidarity Federation and others to protest against workfare outside Peckham Poundland tomorrow: https://www.facebook.com/events/631652860184840/

http://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/
 
Last edited:
These reforms are long overdue, sure it might be painful for some at first but its to be expected with reforms as deep and as far fetching as these. The protestors i saw on the box the otjer night were the normal far left suspects you see at most rallies of this kind so I can't take what they have to say with any credability.
 
Iain Duncan Smith says he could live on £53 a week.

Lets hold him to it then, sign the petition...

https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitio...e-on-53-a-week



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...k-8556002.html

I hope that includes him stacking shelves in a supermarket for it too. He could do it at Morrisons under Cait Reilly's supervision.

signed, wow this thing is gathering pace, its already over 60k and its not even 24 hours, LOL this could be fun if the mainstream news bother to report it
 
signed, wow this thing is gathering pace, its already over 60k and its not even 24 hours, LOL this could be fun if the mainstream news bother to report it

So less than 0.1% of the uk population, or if you prefer a whole 0.12% of the uk electorate.

Still, it makes your position look better supported than if we just count those who took part in the protests at the weekend...
 
So less than 0.1% of the uk population, or if you prefer a whole 0.12% of the uk electorate.

Still, it makes your position look better supported than if we just count those who took part in the protests at the weekend...

:rolleyes:

considering the government actually have to discuss petitions over 100k signatures, this will easily hit that, but ive given up reading your posts as you just agree with everything this government does, including throwing disabled people on the scrap heap, it makes you look 0.12% human, we can only hope you become unemployed or get an acquired disability, then you can eat your dirty tory loving words :p
 
signed, wow this thing is gathering pace, its already over 60k and its not even 24 hours, LOL this could be fun if the mainstream news bother to report it


2cluup.jpg
 
:rolleyes:

considering the government actually have to discuss petitions over 100k signatures, this will easily hit that, but ive given up reading your posts as you just agree with everything this government does, including throwing disabled people on the scrap heap, it makes you look 0.12% human, we can only hope you become unemployed or get an acquired disability, then you can eat your dirty tory loving words :p

lmao :D:D:D:D ouch, oh MrMoonX I know exactly how you feel man but i'm sure you didn't really mean he become disabled as much as I'd like to vomit in his face.
 
Last edited:
:rolleyes:

considering the government actually have to discuss petitions over 100k signatures, this will easily hit that, but ive given up reading your posts as you just agree with everything this government does, including throwing disabled people on the scrap heap, it makes you look 0.12% human, we can only hope you become unemployed or get an acquired disability, then you can eat your dirty tory loving words :p

If agreeing with the welfare changes makes someone 0.12% human what does that make someone who wishes another to get a disability?
 
Especially considering what dolph has posted in the past. Yes, he annoys me and I think his thinking and those that implement it are destroying this country and I will always challenge the way he belittles the people who do give a stuff. But seriously read the blokes post history and why he actually dislike some of the welfare and NHS and you'd see that was a pretty cheap shot. In fairness he has good reason to be bitter.
 
:rolleyes:

considering the government actually have to discuss petitions over 100k signatures, this will easily hit that, but ive given up reading your posts as you just agree with everything this government does, including throwing disabled people on the scrap heap, it makes you look 0.12% human, we can only hope you become unemployed or get an acquired disability, then you can eat your dirty tory loving words :p

Always good to see the compassionate left exposing their true attitude. I especially liked the part where you tell a man with a disabled wife you hope he gets a disability. What a truely disgusting display.
 
Always good to see the compassionate left exposing their true attitude. I especially liked the part where you tell a man with a disabled wife you hope he gets a disability. What a truely disgusting display.

I personally like the way he assumes the reason that people are in favor of these welfare reforms, is because they are wealthy fully fit people who have never experienced severe illness or deal with a disability.

Because you know you couldn't possibly just get on with things and get a job and still pay your own way.

One of my Dads best friends is a guy who was born without the use of legs.

He owns a property development company that he started from scratch and earns a fortune.

One of our customers at my last company was a woman who again had no use of her legs, but ran her own IT company.

It just doesn't compute with some people, the notions of self respect and pride.

Their patronising attitude to the disabled, there there disabled person, you can't possibly help your self.
 
Last edited:
Always good to see the compassionate left exposing their true attitude. I especially liked the part where you tell a man with a disabled wife you hope he gets a disability. What a truely disgusting display.

Maybe you would then not stoop to the level and castigate the people who spend their careers looking after people such as your wife - belittling them, falsely comparing the work they do to completely different systems that treat differing people with different needs, calling for them to be shot down to the lowest common denominator, misrepresenting one report as fact, etc.

And I am pretty left and I showed a darn site more compassion in sticking up for you in the last post and why you may feel the way you do when all you seem to do is knock everything I worked damn hard for and do many others. You say you knock the system yet most of your posts attack the workers.
 
Back
Top Bottom