Ahh kickstarters, the modern cons.
But what about as an auxiliary method of starting Motor-Cycles?
Ahh kickstarters, the modern cons.
Software that isn't on windows, or simply preference.
OSX is better..![]()
As long as they don't mentioned OSX not a lot they can do.
Why would you want to run OSX any way ?
MW
Did they just stick stickers on another board and change the firmware?
Ahh kickstarters, the modern cons.
Give us money so we can build something which we will then sell to you....um yeah OK where do I sign up?
If the demand for a product exists, then it shouldn't need a kick-starter in the first place.
Also...
So what happens to the $102,451 surplus? I guess the guy just pockets it then. And what's to stop this all being nothing, and a few months later he says the project's been pulled for 'technical reasons' and just ****s off?
you'd think the eu would crush them for that though, using their software presence to try and dictate the hardware market.
You get a donation gift, usually the item your backing, which is often at the same or lower amount than the final retail.
So just like pre-ordering as such.
The $100k surplus isn't exactly surplus, he will have to produce more gift as more pledges have been made. His profit per item/pledge will probably stay around the same.
If there is demand kickstarters can be needed still. To fill that demand you first need to have funding available to pay for manufacture, tooling etc.
Not in this case though, nowhere does he claim he'll give away the motherboards to those that donate, he just says he's offering a "great kick-starter launch price" which implies you might get a bit of discount if you donate.
Also given most kickstarters allow you to donate anything over X how would is it fair if someone who donated $10 gets the same 'gift' as someone who donated $100?
Not really, when you pre-order you know the product is coming. There is no guarantee this thing will ever be made. I suspect no one gets their money back if things go **** up.
But presuming they make a profit on every donation then the more donations they get the more free money they get. It still means them pocketing donated money.
Furthermore the money is to get the item produced, not to cover the cost of individual per unit production once it's up and running. In other words, it'll cost them $89,000 just to get the machines set up and ready to go, and it's that money they are asking for.
Once the machine is up and running, I'd suspect the per unit cost would be pretty low after that meaning surplus money becomes ever more profitable
If there is demand, and you have a good product there is no reason they can't find an investor like everyone else does.
I guess what annoys me about these things is I recently heard about a guy named James Rolfe who wanted to make a movie based on his internet character 'The Angry Video Game Nerd". Anyway, he did a kickstarter to get the money he needed to make the film but he got $100k more than he asked for. Since then he has never told anyone what happened to that $100k, the presumption is he just pocketed it.
i don't get it, cant any motherboard run any OS 1 way or another anyway!?
Ahh kickstarters, the modern cons.
Give us money so we can build something which we will then sell to you....um yeah OK where do I sign up?
So what happens to the $102,451 surplus? I guess the guy just pockets it then.
Not in this case though, nowhere does he claim he'll give away the motherboards to those that donate, he just says he's offering a "great kick-starter launch price" which implies you might get a bit of discount if you donate.
Also given most kickstarters allow you to donate anything over X how would is it fair if someone who donated $10 gets the same 'gift' as someone who donated $100?
Not really, when you pre-order you know the product is coming. There is no guarantee this thing will ever be made. I suspect no one gets their money back if things go **** up.
But presuming they make a profit on every donation then the more donations they get the more free money they get. It still means them pocketing donated money.
Furthermore the money is to get the item produced, not to cover the cost of individual per unit production once it's up and running. In other words, it'll cost them $89,000 just to get the machines set up and ready to go, and it's that money they are asking for.
Once the machine is up and running, I'd suspect the per unit cost would be pretty low after that meaning surplus money becomes ever more profitable
If there is demand, and you have a good product there is no reason they can't find an investor like everyone else does.
I guess what annoys me about these things is I recently heard about a guy named James Rolfe who wanted to make a movie based on his internet character 'The Angry Video Game Nerd". Anyway, he did a kickstarter to get the money he needed to make the film but he got $100k more than he asked for. Since then he has never told anyone what happened to that $100k, the presumption is he just pocketed it.
snip.
Any OS?
I wont run AmigaOS - thus I'm not interested.
it breaches the term of OSX I would think
Has any court ever actually upheld Apples EULA?
Certainly there's nothing immoral here anyway, if you pay for software you can use it as you see fit.