Soldato
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 3,177
At least when she's on benefits she can get free glasses!![]()
she needs to be sacked for that. cant just walk out.
im sure she will say she was harassed for 1 pic on her locker and get 100k.
At least when she's on benefits she can get free glasses!![]()
She's dropping it now
Stoopid bint
Steve Williams, chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales also defended the constable..
He said: "It is important that the public understand that police officers are not financially compensated by their own force for injuries received on duty and in fact can lose money through half pay and reduction in allowances.
"It may also affect their future prospects concerning promotion, specialisation and in some cases their continuation in their job.
"There is no distinction between on and off duty injury or illness and whilst the Government may wish to reduce litigation culture, there must be some alternative put in place.
"Let me be clear - to vilify this female officer is wrong.
"She took legal advice as to how she could claim back some of her lost earnings as a result of the injury, and at this stage no formal proceedings have taken place.
"She has been supported by my own organisation, the Police Federation, who have agreed to fund her on a conditional fee basis should the matter progress.
"In my view it is actually we that should be looking at our processes and structures in terms of how we provide advice - she is our member and I feel that our organisation has failed to prepare her for the wider personal impact that might arise from such a claim.
"This is regardless of her right to take this action in law, and the merits of the case which I am not able to discuss."
Epic fail. Very happy she has dropped this. However she/police spin it now it's a joke that it even happened. Typical quick money scheme mentality, that a lot of people have in this day and age I guess.
She will get sick pay. Full pay for the first six months then it's at the discretion of the Chief Constable wether it remains full pay or goes to half pay. After 12 months it s reviewed again.
She will get sick pay. Full pay for the first six months then it's at the discretion of the Chief Constable wether it remains full pay or goes to half pay. After 12 months it s reviewed again.
So there are no "lost earnings" then? Unless she was moon lighting as a pole dancer (unlikely after seeing a pic)
so, after all the moaning they can get sick pay anyway?
do they realise many industries dont get any sick pay (i for example have to lose holidays or dont get paid). i work in construction with more fatalities too (not me im office based) but its not like police is the most dangerous job in the world (in the UK anyway)
Okay... So cutting through all the debate about the moral implications for a second:
As homeowners, what precautions should we take before calling 999, in order to protect ourselves from legal action? If my house is burgled, or I need to call the police to the house for whatever reason, what information do I need to give to the officers to avoid the possibility of being sued?
How do I know what, specifically, presents a hazard to the visiting officers? Obviously things like loose wiring or an under-construction kitchen should be mentioned, but what about more common things like a step at the front door? Or stairs that are not carpeted? What if the burglars have wrecked the house and left it in a state, with "hazards" everywhere? Do I need to clear everything up before I call the police? To whom should I provide this information anyway - the visiting officers, or the 999 operator?
It all seems a little silly to me, but if officers can legally sue me then I'd like to know how I can protect myself before I have to call 999.
"The injuries... required medical treatment and she was on sick leave for some six weeks. She is still receiving on-going treatment to bring about her full recovery.
Quite how she managed to trip over a kerb and be out of work for 6 months is beyond me though.
Stories like this wind me up so much
Tripping over a kerb is your own damn fault, how can this be a lawsuit... Is there any chance she could win? If she wins I might lose all faith in humanity![]()
Quite how she managed to trip over a kerb and be out of work for 6 months is beyond me though.
^^
Did he try to sue anyone though