Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Jul 2007
- Posts
- 3,443
Hi folks.
I currently own a Nissan 350z with the associated running costs. Im more than happy to pay the cost to drive the car and i really love it.
However i've always wanted to own an M3. Ive always put the sensible head on and dismissed it as being too expensive to run but im starting to question whether it is.
Ive recently seen a couple of people where i live buy one and ive thought "ha! Thats going to cost you when something goes wrong!" but is this really the case? Would there be a huge step up for me in terms of cost from the 350z? When i bought it i looked at the M3 at the same time and dismissed it on the basis that if it s much as breaks a nail its going to cost me thousands as the example i could afford would be in the £12-15k bracket.
Basically what im looking for is someone to say "Yes, the M3 will cost you vast sums more than the 350z to own and you should be happy with what you have"
I currently own a Nissan 350z with the associated running costs. Im more than happy to pay the cost to drive the car and i really love it.
However i've always wanted to own an M3. Ive always put the sensible head on and dismissed it as being too expensive to run but im starting to question whether it is.
Ive recently seen a couple of people where i live buy one and ive thought "ha! Thats going to cost you when something goes wrong!" but is this really the case? Would there be a huge step up for me in terms of cost from the 350z? When i bought it i looked at the M3 at the same time and dismissed it on the basis that if it s much as breaks a nail its going to cost me thousands as the example i could afford would be in the £12-15k bracket.
Basically what im looking for is someone to say "Yes, the M3 will cost you vast sums more than the 350z to own and you should be happy with what you have"