As we discussed in your other thread in nutrition (sorry when I say nutrition I mean 'La Cuisine') - and as I alluded to earlier in this very thread - you seem to have a mixed understanding on foods that are 'good' or 'bad'.
Advising somebody (or agreeing with somebody who suggests) to 'stay away from' cereals, bread, pasta is just awful, awful advice - it presumes incompetence from the other person, and patronises them. Not only that, it is complete rubbish. It would be more helpful to suggest lifestyle changes - and a proper awareness of nutrition - rather than a blanket ban on some items.
You perpetuate the myth that there are good foods and bad foods. There are foods with different macros - neither being inherently 'bad' or 'good'. If you continue to spout this nonsense, then don't be surprised when people presume that you are not knowledgeable about the subject.
You also seem to have a fascination with brown this and brown that - why is this?
I would suggest that either your knowledge of nutrition is not as great as you make out, or you are not up to date with scientific findings and using old data and myths.
Obsessed with brown this and that haha.
Ok I'll bite...
Enlighten me. Why isn't brown better than white? Are you trying to insinuate they're all the same and everyone shouldn't bother with brown? Eat white bread, rice and pasta?
Cereals are considered an important source of nutrients both in human and animal nourishment. In this paper nutritional value of brown rice is compared to that of white rice in relation to nutrients. Results show that despite higher nutrients contents of brown rice compared to white rice, experimental data does not provide evidence that the brown rice diet is better than the diet based on white rice. Possible antinutritional factors present in brown rice have adverse effects on bioavailability of this cereal nutrients.
The effect of brown rice with low protein intake was studied in five healthy young men. Feces were weighed, the digestibility of nutrients was determined, and blood tests were made. Each subject followed a diet consisting mainly of polished rice for 14 days and one consisting mainly of brown rice for 8 days. Both diets contained 0.5 g protein per kg of body weight.
The brown rice diet had 3 times as much dietary fiber as the polished rice diet. On the brown rice diet, fecal weight increased, and apparent digestibility of energy, protein, and fat decreased, as did the absorption rates of Na, K, and P. The nitrogen balance was negative on both diets, but more negative on the brown rice diet. The phosphorus balance on the brown rice diet was significantly negative, but other minerals were not affected by the diet. The levels of cholesterol and minerals in the plasma were not significantly different on the polished rice diet and the brown rice diet. Comparing these results with data on standard protein intake we concluded that brown rice reduced protein digestibility and nitrogen balance.
Out of curiosity... What makes you such an expert in the field? Read a few Internet articles or have you studied nutrition at college/UNI? Are you a sports nutritionist or ever been a full time athlete and had to know about this for any reason?
No such thing as bad foods? Tell that to the person with brittle bones, diabetes and urinary infections. Of course there's good and bad food. What a stupid thing to say. Living off mars bars isn't a smart choice and will do you serious harm.
Excuse me for thinking its you who knows nothing.
*sigh*You again
It's obvious to everyone getting fats from nuts and olive oil is better than a sausage roll.
Oh and just so we are clear. I have a very in depth knowledge of nutrition that doesn't come from reading a stickie on a forum. I'm not a beginner to this. Don't feel the need to try and educate me in nutrition.
Ok, I concede. You obviously know a lot more than me. I'll take all that onboard.
Come at you?
As much as I'd love to debate brown bread and mars bars with you all night. I have a girlfriend who's getting wrestless. I'm going to see to her now.
Enjoy the rest of your night and keep calm.

Brown rice is tastier tho....

Ok, I concede. You obviously know a lot more than me. I'll take all that onboard.
Come at you?
As much as I'd love to debate brown bread and mars bars with you all night. I have a girlfriend who's getting wrestless. I'm going to see to her now.
Enjoy the rest of your night and keep calm.
"Toning" a muscle isn't a thing. You either grow it or shrink it. Visible "tone" is more to do with the amount of fat covering it.
Regardless of semantics, high reps with some cheap dumbbells will not move you towards your goal. Unless your goal happens to be getting good at doing high reps with light dumbbells...
(pressups can do this no?)...Joking aside so what do I do ? Are you saying those weights wont do me any good starting out? They won't grow muscle?People were suggesting more serious weights because proper resistance training does all kinds of good stuff for your body composition (bodyfat %). They are not exclusively for people people who want to grow muscle. But if you don't want to do weight, that's fine too.
Either way, you will have to tighten up your diet (which you seem to have started).
For ANY vague muscle gain goal, you should train in the optimum fashion to achieve this in the fastest time.
This means training like a bodybuilder. Some people have serious difficulty wrapping their heads around that, but to do otherwise would just mean wasting your time.
To be clear, you do not have to do this to lose fat. However, I would recommend it, at least for a while. It makes things easier and when you drop to low bodyfat you won't look like a collection of chicken bones.
So what weights are we talking?
For ANY vague muscle gain goal, you should train in the optimum fashion to achieve this in the fastest time.
This means training like a bodybuilder. Some people have serious difficulty wrapping their heads around that, but to do otherwise would just mean wasting your time.
To be clear, you do not have to do this to lose fat. However, I would recommend it, at least for a while. It makes things easier and when you drop to low bodyfat you won't look like a collection of chicken bones.
I openly admitted that I was making a point with the sausage rolls. I don't think anyone was actually suggesting you stuff your face with them
At the risk of being to brief again...
"Toning" a muscle isn't a thing. You either grow it or shrink it. Visible "tone" is more to do with the amount of fat covering it.
Regardless of semantics, high reps with some cheap dumbbells will not move you towards your goal. Unless your goal happens to be getting good at doing high reps with light dumbbells...
People were suggesting more serious weights because proper resistance training does all kinds of good stuff for your body composition (bodyfat %). They are not exclusively for people people who want to grow muscle. But if you don't want to do weight, that's fine too.
Either way, you will have to tighten up your diet (which you seem to have started).
I value your input mate...people are talking about me in this thread as if I'm some kind of simpleton ...I mention weights to tone and I get advised to spend 300 quid on some ?
Sorry but even I know this is BS ... I wouldn't advise a gamer to spend 300quid on a gfx card when he games at 720p ....what does 300quid of weights do over 50quid in my situation?
A bike is a bike....if I spend 300 on one will I get stronger and bigger than buying a 150 quid one ?
Nope...
I have no desire to get totally ripped....I want to lose weight ...get fitter and tone up a bit..... That's it....no extreme dream body that is far from interesting or even desirable...
Every time I mention a goal or direction....it's quashed by not being serious enough or hardcore enough...
I've lost 6.5 pounds in my first week and eaten all natural foods...no alcohol and been strict...I have been running on the treadmill and feel a lot better already.
These sausage roll BS posts are quite frankly laughable...you all know it...you are just trying to prove a point.
As for brown bread v white....A brown granary loaf blows chunks over a white loaf both in taste and texture.... So why would I eat white?
One can spout that white is no worse than brown....nutritionally speaking but who cares? Brown is where it's at.
IT TASTES BETTER....SO IT BLOCKS CERTAIN NUTRIENTS.? Well I can get these from somewhere else.....
See what I did there?
'Come at me' is a tongue in cheek comment.
It's not about 'knowing more', just trying to move away from myth and also support people toward their goals!
Not entirely sure what the girlfriend comment is about, but have a great time.![]()
Then fill your boots. Personally I can't stand rice most of the time in any variety!![]()
Advising somebody (or agreeing with somebody who suggests) to 'stay away from' cereals, bread, pasta is just awful, awful advice