Fair enough, but it comes out as a pretty poor defence when multiple questions were asked.I'm not clutching at anything, I'm just interested in accuracy. I would argue that presenting a question one way then presenting it a different way when you report it was more akin to clutching at straws.
I think the questions "should white people be given preference for jobs" & "are non-white people born in the UK less British" are both telling enough.If they really wanted a true reflection of how racist voters are then why not just ask something like "Do you believe black people are inherently less intelligent than white people" and report it as "% of people that think black people are less intelligent than whites"? That way, there would be no confusion and your findings would hold more water.
I agree it isn't just white people who are racist, but UKIP's values themselves seem to align pretty well with xenophobes & racists.Furthermore I dislike how the questions promotes the idea that racism is only about white supremacy. I'd bet if you asked questions on people's support for so-called 'positive discrimination' you'd no doubt see high support from the left wing voters which in my opinion is also racism.
While I don't personally agree with positive discrimination myself (as discrimination is still discrimination) it's not "racist", it's discriminatory.
Racism is about superiority, racial discrimination is preference based on ethnicity (Which could be for a multitude of reasons, such as racism or "positive discrimination" or a quota system).
As I said, I don't agree with it either - but it's not racist.