You just need to see the circulation stats for the Sun and Daily Mail to see that comment is spot on.
That's what makes it sig worthy rather than just a funny comment

You just need to see the circulation stats for the Sun and Daily Mail to see that comment is spot on.
1) They can have the pay, as long as they give up the allowances. After all, they got the allowances to get around not getting pay rises. If they are being paid (say) £100k then they can afford a -ing hotel room now and again. And to pay the staff they employ. Those that don't employ their own family or mistresses anyway.
2) Performance-related rises only. They love to advocate these for the rest of the public sector, but always seem to miss themselves off the list.
You just need to see the circulation stats for the Sun and Daily Mail to see that comment is spot on.
2) Performance-related rises only. They love to advocate these for the rest of the public sector, but always seem to miss themselves off the list.
your link to MM rules appears to be broken
I don't see the problem.
MP's have a difficult job with a lot of pressure and responsibility.
If they're working 80 hours a week then I think it's justified. But then you've got to take into account their holidays too, so I think that would push it to 100 hours...
At least they would value evidence for setting policy, screw democracy - the public are idiots.
That's sig worthy.
It is very difficult. On the one hand I don't want career politicians who join the party at uni, work as a special advisor etc for a few years then get handed a safe seat to be earning that much money. On the other hand we have to attract top quality people in - and £67k just isn't going to do that. We need captains of industry as MPs, and at my work even middle ranking engineers make more than that (with OT).
It is very difficult. On the one hand I don't want career politicians who join the party at uni, work as a special advisor etc for a few years then get handed a safe seat to be earning that much money. On the other hand we have to attract top quality people in - and £67k just isn't going to do that. We need captains of industry as MPs, and at my work even middle ranking engineers make more than that (with OT).
This is just horse **** you don't need to attract people to politics with money it should be done for public service, the sacrifice is you could earn more doing something else![]()
I don't see the problem.
Spook, why don't you run to be your local MP if you think you could do a better job for less?
So while other people are taking pay cuts, you think its justified to grab £20,000 as the link says.
To be honest i may one day run for local MP, i would be fair and honest.
Yes.
And go for it. Your constituency has my thoughts.