Mike Wilson, a Highways Agency Regional Director, suggested highways engineers are often not trained with cyclists in mind. He said: ''As a highways engineer I spent a lot of time designing motorways and roundabouts, but I didn't spend a lot of time looking at provision for non-motorised users."
Roger Geffen, CTC Campaigns Director, said cyclists are often designed out of road projects. He said: "The Highways Agency seems to be saying: 'We went in [to a site], there were no cyclists, so we didn't put anything in."
Gerhard Weiss, LCC's Cycling Development Officer, said under current Department for Transport (DfT) guidelines, cyclists who don't ride confidently on the carriageway are left with complex junctions which are difficult and intimidating to navigate.
Phil Jones, Managing Director of Phil Jones Associates, highlighted that DfT guidelines for cycling infrastructure are produced every few years, compared to guidelines for motorised traffic infrastructure, which are updated several times a year.
But you would rather take on countless tonnes of metal on a daily basis? Go figure...
AFAIK, where the Highway Code says "should" it's advisory, and where it says "must" it is law. So it's perfectly allowable to ride three-abreast, but the code recommends against it.http://ipayroadtax.com/no-such-thin...have-right-of-way-he-doesnt-even-pay-road-tax
some of the comments on here after my post (i am liamt) just make me want to bang my head against a brick wall. apparently its ok to violate the highway code if you are a cyclist.
Haha, seriously thats how you think of cyclists. That they are taking on cars. There is no reason for motorist to make it dangerous for cyclists.
Cyclists seem to think that most motorists are bad drivers...Drivers know that ALL motorists are bad drivers
As a driver, there is no way in hell id be a road cyclist.
I don't think we do. I would say its a rather small number of motorists that are dangerous drivers but when you see someone being a pillock from the seat of a car you don't really bat an eyelid. When someone overtakes 6 inches from your handlebars then cuts across you to turn, it has a way of making your blood boil.
p.s. I'm not misinterpreting your point here, merely saying that cyclists don't think that most motorists are bad. Its just that when something happens that is dangerous, its a lot more relevant to cyclists.
Its called road safety, if the cylist is in a row of cars, where the cars are grouped together, cars other than the ones closest to the cyclist can have no idea they are there. When they attempt to change lanes because they want to turn left, have no idea the cyclist is there, and try and cut in then smash into a cylist, its bad.
The cyclist is the most in danger, so getting to the front of the queue gives him the safest way to get across a junction because the drivers in the lanes at the front will see him and cyclist gets pretty much to get across the junction before being overtaken, with most relevant cars knowing where he is. Past the junction with less/no turns, traffic as spread out, the cyclist is more visible and is in less danger.
Because lots of cars have a tendancy to run cyclists over when turning left...
If the cyclist is in front they can get away first before the car has a chance to turn into them.
On a road with more than one lane, you run a large risk, especially on a roundabout, of someone cutting lanes without checking their blind spot. At the front you are mitigating that risk.
Just believe me/us - it's about protecting ourselves, not to annoy you specifically....
Going back to this situation about this girl, I am more sickened that she found it morally acceptable to just continue driving away after knocking someone down, never mind boasting about it!
I don't think I am being a tool (as you so eloquently put it) at all, although perhaps labouring a point somewhat because I do not feel I should back down in a discussion (not argument) where cyclists have come back with the excuse that cycling on a dangerous dual carriageway is somehow more acceptable than having to cycle on a path that has been provided for them.
Adults can generally have a discussion without having to resort to the insults. Come now grudas surely you can step up to the place?
What do drivers do when they are presented with a surface that is in poor condition and of danger to their car? Slow down, that's what they do, so do it on your bike on YOUR cycle path.
I once again feel the need to stress that this is on particular roads I am talking about here, not roads in general. I have no problem with cyclists, I really don't.
The same as if your in your little fiesta and a 44ton HGV is coming the other way.
I take it if you see a HGV coming round a tight corner and he has to take up some of "YOUR" side of the road you would position your vehicle so he has to stop and can't complete his turn.