We already have this in the UK. Big business (banks in particular) are allowed to get away with fraud on a massive scale, councils are free to abuse their power on a whim and when reported to the police, the crime magically disappears.
I think there are many criminal offences which are morally permissible but I'm not sure how a criminal offence can be legal. Stealing from a food bank to feed your starving child would not be deemed worthy of punishment by many but it would still be illegal by law.
My question would be... Would anyone from OCUK deviate from their normal life to commit a 'legal crime' during this 12 hour window?
Not sure I would do anything... I have morals! (jumps on high horse and gallops away!)
/shrug, killing somebody is a crime but its legal in self defense...
But surely this 12 hours of no laws would have to be written into law otherwise there would be no laws forever as there'd be no laws in place to create new laws or bring back the old ones. So 'for the next 12 hours there is only one law that for 12 hours all other laws are postponed.' This however is not quite as catchy as 'all crimes are legal for 12 hours', if that can be called 'catchy' in the firstplace.
As long as you get the idea of the film (Purge), then don't read in to the technicalities too much![]()
let's all plan a ocuk hiest for crimes against equality in Haribo distribution.
Why not just buy them? £0.50 from Morrisons isn't breaking the bank is it?
This is one of those interesting cases where the act of stealing would be considered a crime under positive law, but would not be considered stealing under the natural law.
It illustrates a difference of approach between positive and natural law: in a humane and competent administration of justice, actions contrary to a positive law would be considered crimes but punishment would be mitigated by the circumstances. In a natural law system, consideration of the nature of the act itself would show it not to be an act of stealing at all.
One might also look at some of those cases where juries refuse to convict someone of a positive law crime as situations in which an intuitive grasp of natural law considerations show the drafting of the positive law to be faulty.
I wish OcUK would stop giving them out. It is unbecoming everyone creaming themselves over bags of sweets.
So do you believe there is such a thing as natural law then?
And if that is the case then presumably you think for a law to be "good" it should flow from a natural law principle?