Smoothness and precision can be felt by a solid, positive action. A bit of weight behind it and yet feeling like you're positively engaging something. Not how I'd describe the Honda gearboxes I've experienced.
Am I mad? 80 miles per day in a 1.8 petrol
- Thread starter mattyprice4004
- Start date
Smoothness and precision can be felt by a solid, positive action. A bit of weight behind it and yet feeling like you're positively engaging something. Not how I'd describe the Honda gearboxes I've experienced.
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 7,567
- Location
- Southport
Find me something better for the £580 I paid - by better I mean handling, economy and longevity. There's not a fleck of rust on it at 10 years old - I struggle to see how you can judge lifetime from that?
I've driven pretty much all mass-market cars either through my old job or test drives, and the ZS seems to have a 'fun factor' that's quite hard to find at this price point.
I'm happy anyway - did my first commute today in it and on the brisk B roads it had me grinning when giving it some. You can certainly tell it's a very light engine, so free revving.
I can see why they put it in the Elise now! I've never really understood that, as I've never driven one properly before.
When I had a Rover Coupe with the VVC engine it was good. Great revving engine (more power than yours which will be a 120 no VVC?) and very light, no understeer at all compared to the heavier T series turbo engines, fairly fast but it was a fairly light car with a reasonable power engine.
Can't remember fuel economy but it was noticeably better than the older T series engines (no surprise there). Had some good times in that car with the roof popped in summer.
WRT the financial side, I would try to run one car only..
Fun factor and economy at your price range, I'd buy a 306 hdi, better economy and handling. Cheaper, buy a Xsara hdi as its the same car but ugly and more powerful as it is intercooled iirc.
Can't remember fuel economy but it was noticeably better than the older T series engines (no surprise there). Had some good times in that car with the roof popped in summer.
WRT the financial side, I would try to run one car only..
Fun factor and economy at your price range, I'd buy a 306 hdi, better economy and handling. Cheaper, buy a Xsara hdi as its the same car but ugly and more powerful as it is intercooled iirc.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 7,567
- Location
- Southport
Aye, the 600 is now off the road on SORN and not insured. It's kept off the highway.
It's only a 120, but the light chassis means it does pick up quite well. I'm enjoying it so far, but I do miss the sunroof of the 600. I don't miss the old suspension and clutch, though!
It's only a 120, but the light chassis means it does pick up quite well. I'm enjoying it so far, but I do miss the sunroof of the 600. I don't miss the old suspension and clutch, though!
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2011
- Posts
- 12,884
- Location
- Surrey
Extremely mad. I had 65MPG on an A-road trip through West Sussex, 70 mile round journey. Needle hasn't moved from full.
Might not be a Caterham 7 but as a daily the Golf is amazeballs.
Might not be a Caterham 7 but as a daily the Golf is amazeballs.
Not something these Rovers do well at really? You seem to replace them every other month!
I can sort of understanding liking a 600 and wanting a good example, but surely it makes sense to start with a ti rather than a nasty old diesel? Old diesels are good hacks, that's it.
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 7,567
- Location
- Southport
I said longevity, not length of ownership. I tend to fix issues, then sell them on to finance something else. A bit of beer money.
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 7,567
- Location
- Southport
You probably have a lot more cash, it's not hard to have more than me. 
Got to say, something revvy is a breath of fresh air after the diesel. I love the 600 to bits, but having insta-power and 7,000rpm is a lot of fun when you're used to a lump or torque and then nothing.
Got to say, something revvy is a breath of fresh air after the diesel. I love the 600 to bits, but having insta-power and 7,000rpm is a lot of fun when you're used to a lump or torque and then nothing.
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 7,567
- Location
- Southport
You probably have a lot more cash, it's not hard to have more than me.
Reason why I am poor now lol
- Joined
- 24 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 7,567
- Location
- Southport
Couple of pics for you all:
But in the context of this thread the fact that you are after a more economical daily drive is probably more relevant
It's not really the economy that bothers me, I make money on anything over 22mpg, it's the frequent servicing that puts me off. I can rarely get booked in on a weekend which means I have to take a day of work. I'm a contractor and that means I lose my daily rate for that day, plus I have to pay for a service on top. In addition, I don't like putting too many miles on it.
