Tongue-sewn diet patch makes eating painful

Capodecina
Soldato
Joined
1 Aug 2005
Posts
20,005
Location
Flatland
A plastic patch sewn which is sewn onto the tongue and makes it very difficult to eat is the latest in extreme weight-loss methods.

The 'miracle' patch, which is secured to the tongue with six stitches, makes consuming solid food so painful that users are forced to resort to a liquid-only diet.

Launched in 2009 by Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Nikolas Chugay, the procedure can apparently help you lose up to 30lbs in one month - but not without uncomfortable side effects.

Diet trend: A 'miracle' patch that is sewn onto the tongue for a month is the latest extreme weight-loss technique. The pain of eating solid foods with the patch forces wearers to consume only liquids

Dr Chugay's website warns that patients may experience swelling of the tongue and difficulty with speech after getting the patch.

And according to Time, some patients have trouble sleeping and difficulty moving their tongue at all following the procedure, which has yet to be FDA-approved.

What's more, the patch can only be worn for a maximum of one month, since after that time, the tongue's tissue begins to grow back, and the patch can then become incorporated into the tongue.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...n-tongues-make-eating-unbearably-painful.html

You'd think that some people would be able to practise self control or watch calories but no.
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...n-tongues-make-eating-unbearably-painful.html

You'd think that some people would be able to practise self control or watch calories but no.
Not that I agree with this method, but it's clearly not that simple (as otherwise we wouldn't have a massive obesity epidemic).

The simple fact is we are highly drawn to sugary & fatty foods due to our evolutions, unfortunately now these foods are easily available we get fat.

Undoing thousands of years of evolution seems a little bit more of a task than say, reducing the sugar & fat content of popular foods.
 
it's clearly not that simple

But it is that simple.

The reasons why people fail to lose weight are:

Lack of self control
Lack of understanding that as they age their BMR decreases
Vastly underestimating the amount of calories they're eating
Vastly overestimating the amount of calories they're burning

It all comes down to the same thing: calories out > calories in = weight loss.
 
But it is that simple.

The reasons why people fail to lose weight are:

Lack of self control
Lack of understanding that as they age their BMR decreases
Vastly underestimating the amount of calories they're eating
Vastly overestimating the amount of calories they're burning

It all comes down to the same thing: calories out > calories in = weight loss.

Agreed it's quite easy to lose weight once the above is understood, and what in thier diet needs to be avoided

E.G: 3 Macie D's meals.....and a diet coke
 
Not that I agree with this method, but it's clearly not that simple (as otherwise we wouldn't have a massive obesity epidemic).

The simple fact is we are highly drawn to sugary & fatty foods due to our evolutions, unfortunately now these foods are easily available we get fat.

Undoing thousands of years of evolution seems a little bit more of a task than say, reducing the sugar & fat content of popular foods.

LOL WUT
You are blaming evolution on fatties eating too much stuff that is bad for them?
 
But it is that simple.

The reasons why people fail to lose weight are:

Lack of self control
Lack of understanding that as they age their BMR decreases
Vastly underestimating the amount of calories they're eating
Vastly overestimating the amount of calories they're burning

It all comes down to the same thing: calories out > calories in = weight loss.
I didn't say knowing how to lose weight is complicated.

I said doing it is complicated.

Saying, "omg have some willpower" - is a gross over-simplification of the underline causes of obesity.

If everybody could instantly have willpower hardly anybody would be fat, lazy, or a myriad of other self-harming activities.

LOL WUT
You are blaming evolution on fatties eating too much stuff that is bad for them?
Are you suggesting that our evolution plays no part in our preference for sweet or fatty foods?.
 
Last edited:
I can't think why any normal person would have that done, it's revolting. Self control is where it's at.
 
But it is that simple.

The reasons why people fail to lose weight are:

Lack of self control
Lack of understanding that as they age their BMR decreases
Vastly underestimating the amount of calories they're eating
Vastly overestimating the amount of calories they're burning

It all comes down to the same thing: calories out > calories in = weight loss.

'weight' loss is easy...doing it properly is something else.

as per your calories in > calories out thing, its perfectly possible to lose weight by eating at mcdonalds for every single meal...or eating nothing but chocolate.

losing fat is the thing people need to do..and that is not as simple as calories out > calories in
 
Saying, "omg have some willpower" - is a gross over-simplification of the underline causes of obesity.

Which are what?

Fat mind, fat body. If you are lazy and don't look into why you're fat, or if you can't be bothered to research it or make time to do anything about it, you will stay fat.
 
It lives up to the name of an 'extreme' weight loss method.

It's worrying that this can be done for $150 + plane ticket, in order to endure a month of pain and no sleep.
 
I can't think why any normal person would have that done, it's revolting. Self control is where it's at.

they obviously arent normal though are they? they are heavily obese and on the way to their death. they obviously dont have self control.
 
But it is that simple.

The reasons why people fail to lose weight are:

Lack of self control
Lack of understanding that as they age their BMR decreases
Vastly underestimating the amount of calories they're eating
Vastly overestimating the amount of calories they're burning

It all comes down to the same thing: calories out > calories in = weight loss.

While it's true at base level, I prefer to look at it in the more "complete" dietary sense.

Sure, you could tell someone that exercise and calorie deficit is the way to weight loss, but that can also be used to just as detrimental effect on the body as eating too much.

Taking in a 300-calorie deficit in food daily, coupled with 250+ calories burned through exercise is, on paper, the way forward for someone looking to lose weight. Problem is, what if that person is packing out the rest of their calories with crap? They're doing their body no good whatsoever -- and while they'll lose weight, it'll be a miserable and slow process.

The person staying in deficit and exercising vigorously daily for cardio and strength would be better served upping their calories slightly, and paying attention to what is in the food they eat. Counting the calories is all good and well, but if you're looking for good improvement you need to make sure you're getting the protein you need to rebuild and recover, and keep the sugars down in your food and drink, too. Someone who doesn't understand this may just think that since they've got a few hundred calories to spare, it doesn't matter whether they eat some gateau or plump for some lean chicken instead, after working out.

There's a lot more education that people need beyond "calories in < calories out, you eejit!"

Being so simplistic leads to people eating nothing but two cans of soup a day, exercising like a mad case and dying of heart failure.

On topic with the OP, though -- what an incredibly dumb idea. Can't people just put some seriously hot chilli in whatever they eat if they want to go to that extreme (unless they're chilli-heads, of course)? I could easily see some massive pleb with one these sewn on their tongue drinking liquidised cheeseburgers and complaining that it doesn't work.
 
While it's true at base level, I prefer to look at it in the more "complete" dietary sense.

Sure, you could tell someone that exercise and calorie deficit is the way to weight loss, but that can also be used to just as detrimental effect on the body as eating too much.

Taking in a 300-calorie deficit in food daily, coupled with 250+ calories burned through exercise is, on paper, the way forward for someone looking to lose weight. Problem is, what if that person is packing out the rest of their calories with crap? They're doing their body no good whatsoever -- and while they'll lose weight, it'll be a miserable and slow process.

The person staying in deficit and exercising vigorously daily for cardio and strength would be better served upping their calories slightly, and paying attention to what is in the food they eat. Counting the calories is all good and well, but if you're looking for good improvement you need to make sure you're getting the protein you need to rebuild and recover, and keep the sugars down in your food and drink, too. Someone who doesn't understand this may just think that since they've got a few hundred calories to spare, it doesn't matter whether they eat some gateu or plump for some lean chicken instead, after working out.

There's a lot more education that people need beyond "calories in < calories out, you eejit!"

Being so simplistic leads to people eating nothing but two cans of soup a day, exercising like a mad case and dying of heart failure.

On topic with the OP, though -- what an incredibly dumb idea. Can't people just put some seriously hot chilli in whatever they eat if they want to go to that extreme (unless they're chilli-heads, of course)? I could easily see some massive pleb with one these sewn on their tongue drinking liquidised cheeseburgers and complaining that it doesn't work.

Very good post.
 
Which are what?

Fat mind, fat body. If you are lazy and don't look into why you're fat, or if you can't be bothered to research it or make time to do anything about it, you will stay fat.
Comfort eating.

Parents instilling food into the reward punishment mechanism during the early developmental period in a child's life.

Sugar addiction.

Which is beside the point, what you are pointing out are things which can result in being fat - not the reasons why the person has those traits, or the potential barriers to removing those traits (which will allow them to exercise or do something about the situation).

As I said, a gross over-simplification.
 
'weight' loss is easy...doing it properly is something else.

as per your calories in > calories out thing, its perfectly possible to lose weight by eating at mcdonalds for every single meal...or eating nothing but chocolate.

Yes, it is. As long as you keep within your Total Daily Energy Expenditure. It wouldn't be very good for you though.

losing fat is the thing people need to do..and that is not as simple as calories out > calories in

It is that simple.
 
Back
Top Bottom