Alex Jones goes mental on Sunday Politics

I think the bbc let him on knowing he would go mental as he did with piers morgan trying there best to discredit him. Could be wrong.
 
I am just wondering,

When people call someone conspiracy theorist, why do they always expect them to be a mental nut?

Surely Conspiracy is when someone believes into alternative reason or way of events supplied by the government... If you believe EVERYTHING the government says, you are clearly retarded...

So if I believe that Iraq war was clearly nothing to do with chemical weapons I am all of a sudden conspiracy theorist who is a nut?? Even though this fact has been proven but not accepted by the government...

Same goes for Libya, clearly western countries were interested in oil and stopping gedaffi moving away from trading in dollars, but since its not the official government stance, I am conspiracy theorist again?? :D

So I ask a question to all people who say conspiracy theorist are mentally retarded, don't you think you all a bit too naive and stupid to believe everything the government says to you ? :D

I agree that some go to stupid levels like the group who believes the earth is flat lmao :D But you know it makes sense not to trust what government says and that makes you conspiracy theorist straight away...
 
Last edited:
deanolfc said:
pear morgan
Click to expand...

9urj70O.png
 
GeneralD said:
Jones is extremely entertaining, and to be fair, he does often cover a lot of topics before the msm. However he seems to think everything is a conspiracy.
Click to expand...

He is just the polar opposite of the majority who are convinced that conspiracies don't exist at all and that anyone with a non-mainstream opinion is a nutcase.
 
Lazder said:
When people call someone conspiracy theorist, why do they always expect them to be a mental nut?
Click to expand...

Because people like Alex Jones exist.




They claim that next to everything is a conspiracy, just like Nostradamus, occasionally get close to the truth through their incoherent meanderings. This makes them think they are correct and justified in their attacks and theories.
 
Lazder said:
Same goes for Libya, clearly western countries were interested in oil and stopping gedaffi moving away from trading in dollars
Click to expand...

Clearly? Pre-Libya almost all oil contracts in Libya was ALREADY held by Western countries! There wasn't really much to gain oil wise from the Libyan intervention.

As for 'moving from dollars to euros' I can't see why most of Europe would be keen to start a war to avoid that, for obvious reasons!
 
[TW]Fox;24420987 said:
Clearly? Pre-Libya almost all oil contracts in Libya was ALREADY held by Western countries! There wasn't really much to gain oil wise from the Libyan intervention.

As for 'moving from dollars to euros' I can't see why most of Europe would be keen to start a war to avoid that, for obvious reasons!
Click to expand...

So you suggesting that intervention in Libya was based on protecting "civilians" :D:D

:D:D:D

Do you know that Berlusconi was very close friends with Gedaffi and it was UK and USA who spent far most to bomb Libya... Both dont use Euros.

There was many countries in Europe who opposed intervention including Germany. Have you seen modern Libya post war?? More people dying every-day during gang/clans/religion clashes, than ever under Gedaffi.

If NATO was in Libya to save people, where are they now?? They are living x100 worse than they did under Gedaffi and more die every-day in violence than under Gedaffi... Amazing mission with amazing results :D

There is another idea, since West is so concerned with people dying in Libya or Syria why not start intervening in whole Africa?? I mean far more people die there each day under ridiculous dictatorships which murder whole ethnic groups, yet no one cares. The only time they do get help is if some precious metal gets discovered in the country :D


This cartoon sums up the issue well, just change Poland`s color with any other country in middle east.

1360538286948.png
 
Last edited:
I don't watch alex jones, but have been watching some of his clips for 10 years and I don't think he is crazy. I just think he is an entertainer. He tries to bring what he thinks is the truth to as many people as possible but at the same time make it entertaining and funny. I don't watch his show every week or very often, but when he goes to bilderberg meetings i find it very funny and entertaining. I was going to go down to watford to meet alex jones and the other guys but was too lazy in the end. When he stands their shouting at everyone with the police right in his face and he is starts doing stupid things. I find it quite funny.

 
He is insane (or an actor).

The worst thing about him is he also does a disservice to his "cause" - as anybody who may have genuine concerns about certain government activities gets tarred with the same "crazy brush".

If this is intention or not is also a conspiracy theory itself - which frankly I couldn't be bothered entertaining.
 
Lazder said:
When people call someone conspiracy theorist, why do they always expect them to be a mental nut?
Click to expand...

erm because they generally are... for someone to be labeled a 'conspiracy theorist' they're generally pushing lots of conspiracy theories which tend to require people to disregard or distort some facts, and draw rather ridiculous conclusions from other bits of information.

Someone simply questioning accepted narratives aren't necessarily conspiracy nuts - publications such as the Guardian do so regularly... what they don't do is propose wildly speculative alternatives with no basis for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom