Apart from the battery life, it's a poor version of a MBP
The MBP is a lot bigger and heavier so how can you compare?
. I've highlighted the larger values..Don't exaggerate. I've highlighted the larger values..
MBP height 1.9cm vs MBA height 1.7 (at thickest point)
MBP width 31.4cm vs MBA width 32.5cm
MBP depth 21.9cm vs MBA depth 22.7cm
MBP weight 1.62kg vs MBA weight 1.35kg
13" MBP vs 13" MBA
Non retina

So the MBP non-retina is 2.06kg vs MBA 1.35kg![]()

I returned my newly purchased iMac today in favour of the high end 13" Air. It's very impressive, I've been using it since about 2pm doing pretty heavy stuff. Installing lots of apps, transferring files from my external HDD etc and I'm still on 40% battery.
The SSD is super quick too, everything is almost iPad instant. Also temps are fine, roughly the same as my old 2012 Air.
I returned my newly purchased iMac today in favour of the high end 13" Air. It's very impressive, I've been using it since about 2pm doing pretty heavy stuff. Installing lots of apps, transferring files from my external HDD etc and I'm still on 40% battery.
The SSD is super quick too, everything is almost iPad instant. Also temps are fine, roughly the same as my old 2012 Air.

Worth the change from the 2012?
Remember that the new Air does not have an SSD. It uses PCIE based flash storage now. The SATA interface is gone![]()
More impressive, the new flash storage breezed through our file copy test, duplicating 4.9GB worth of multimedia files in just 21 seconds. That equals a transfer rate of 242.4 MBps, compared with 159 Mbps for the last Air. The new also Air beats the Samsung ATIV Book 9 (154 MBps) and Kirabook (221 MBps). However, the Acer Aspire S7's dual SSDs (318 MBps) and the VAIO Pro 13's own PCIe flash memory (392 MBps) trump this Air.
Remember that the new Air does not have an SSD. It uses PCIE based flash storage now. The SATA interface is gone![]()
It's still an SSD. PCIe SSD.Temps for those interested, plugged in and just web browsing.
![]()