US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt'

LateX'Dog

LateX'Dog

LateX'Dog

Soldato
Joined
25 Jul 2010
Posts
5,342
Location
A house
The Obama administration gave green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on President Bashar al Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.

A new report, that contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed a scheme 'approved by Washington'.

As per the scheme 'Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons,' the Daily Mail reports.

Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using chemical weapons against its own people.

According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was sent from Britam's Business Development Director David Goulding to company founder Philip Doughty.

The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumes and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.

According to the paper, the U.S. State Department has declined to comment on the matter. (ANI)
Click to expand...

http://in.news.yahoo.com/us-backed-plan-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-syria-045648224.html

More and more evidence is surfacing that is showing how messed up things are in Syria.

So we have the UK and US claiming the Syrian government have been using chemical weapons.

Then we have the UN saying it was the Rebels.

Now we have a report saying that Americans gave the OK to the rebels to use chemical weapons and blame it on the Syrian Government.

Not sure how much more information people require..
 
Last edited:
[FnG]magnolia;24472534 said:
Your reasoned opinion rather than RSS feed after RSS feed would perhaps be a start.
Click to expand...

All you seem to post it the request for me to post my opinion. My opinion isn't needed as the information speaks for its self.
 
I'm just a ... whatever the singular of sheeple is :(

e : ^ well, in this case and almost all of the other cases where you have posted anti-US thoughts using someone else's column/website/source, your opinion would be required as the OP who should have a duty of care to make his thread at least something people can respond to instead of posting and running. I disagree with everything you say but at least have the balls to put your own opinion in your threads somewhere even if all you can do is copy the words of someone else and then blame America.
 
Last edited:
Not sure how much more information people require..
Click to expand...

Well one source says Assad is responsible, one source says the Rebels, and one says the US/UK. And apparently I am to believe some source, but not others, depending which side you speak to. So I definitely need more evidence!
 
[FnG]magnolia;24472588 said:
I'm just a ... whatever the singular of sheeple is :(
Click to expand...

Sheeperson? That sounds like an overly PC term for woman though!

Citing infowars? Really?
 
LateX'Dog;24472529. said:
Not sure how much more information people require..
Click to expand...

Require for what?
Have you seen these documents?
I've seen you report an email exchange exists as reported online somewhere, reported coming from a Malaysian hacker who stole things from a British company's unprotected server. This server apparently had an email exchange between two people who were not US based saying the US had sanctioned a chemical weapons attack that didn't take place.

What are you actually trying to state this time LateX'Dog?

You have stated some gibberish, but I am not sure how much more information I need before you get to a point?
Have you a point?
What are you trying to convey?
What is your modus operandi?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom