Fair few warning lights on there.
I've done a lot of reading about mapping Evo's, most tuners seem to be too hung up about numbers, Ant seems very hooked up about safety, which is fine by me.Very very nice car Chris. Ant at Indigo is a top guy, he supplied a fair bit of kit for me but I used to go to MG Auto's as it was more convenient for me. Haven't read the whole thread but what mods do you have planned for it?
I think it would be faster if I rolled from 60 in 4th, one less gear change needed.My EVO X with all mods was 60-100mph in 5.6s on racelogic box, yours is 5.9s on speedo, so probably around 6.5s circa at moment as EVO speedo's are not accurate.
The Mustang was 3.8-4.2s and the 911 is 5.0s-5.4s I think from memory, just need to double check.
My EVO X with all mods was 60-100mph in 5.6s on racelogic box,
I think it would be faster if I rolled from 60 in 4th, one less gear change needed.![]()
Point taken, just adding to the conversation. Performance cars without performance figures don't go well together IMO.
I think it would be faster if I rolled from 60 in 4th, one less gear change needed.![]()
My Evo 7 FQ300 with just a decat put out 352bhp when I RR'd it![]()
You don't realise how fast these cars are till something like a VXR tries racing you.![]()