Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Some people just don't understand that other people are trying to help them...
The symptoms of MS depend on the patient. Some of the symptoms can manifest this way.
Without looking at her MRI and knowing her history I wouldn't be able to say whether it was directly directly caused by sclerosis in a behaviour centre, as an indirect consequence caused by sclerosis, because she is annoyed with life, etc.
Ok I'll edit this as you are getting some really stupid advice in this thread.
You have to think what the mechanism of MS is. Area of the neural network eg spine + brain are systematically attacked at varying intervals causing damage and potential malfunction in that area. There is no real pattern to how it changes people because it really depends on which area is attacked. Eg attack on the optic nerves - sight depletion (this is common but actually indicative of lesser severity), attacking say C5 spine then you may get tingling at the finger tips and shooting sensations down the limbs whenever the neck is moved. So it really depends on where this woman has had the damage does it not? She may for all you know have had her behaviour centres attacked therefore changing her behaviour etc. I am sure you get the picture.
What you need to forget is muppets who say they know people with MS and they don't do this. Great for those people who will have a different pattern because they have been attacked in different areas. Those people may not have to have lived with the life this woman has.
That is not to excuse the behaviour - just give it a frame of reference.
I would say in my experience (which is considerable in this field) that people with MS have in the main significant problems that would manifest as frustrations, mental health issues, anger, factors associated with fatigue in the later stages. However, I have not really met people who I would consider to be complete and utter ***** unless they actively undergoing a "relapse" in which case their behaviour may well be out of their control.
tldr.
[FnG]magnolia;24497667 said:This is another type of post.
She might have been peed of that you don't know the difference between "its" and "it's".
I don't believe that it's a side effect of that particular illness.
More likely that she was just a complete **** who likes to use her illness as a weapon and excuse to treat others like the inconsiderate piece of **** she actually is.
aspergers has pretty much 0 impact on behaviour only social norms for the most part?very few exceptions, like Asperger's and autism, but even then, bad behaviour must be attempted to be corrected
What was the nature of her complaint? Maybe your training wasn't as good as you thought and you were being extremely inflexible and frustrating to deal with?
Or, she was simply a grumpy biznitch.
When I asked how she was intending to maintain payments upon retirement she went mental. Very abrupt with me despite me trying to help her![]()
/snip
it's how a lot of people with autism are that you will meet in day to day life even though you likely won't even realise they are not normal.It may not have an effect on your behaviour and how you are but it does to others.
I do wonder whether your really understand your condition when on one hand you say quite rightly it is a spectrum disorder then on the other hand attribute your personal experience as the truth. Maybe it's the lack of empathy ...
I don't believe that it's a side effect of that particular illness.
More likely that she was just a complete **** who likes to use her illness as a weapon and excuse to treat others like the inconsiderate piece of **** she actually is.
This.
I have MS. Life is full of stress, MS adds to that, but it's still no excuse to be rude another. People will however argue that anyone with an illness can have outbursts of distress and anger - take that as you will.
>> first time I spoke with someone suffering from Multiple sclerosis. I just wondered is this normal
No, and it is no excuse. Take this as experience with the individual, not the condition.