Associate
- Joined
- 14 Jun 2013
- Posts
- 558
Women want mature intellectuals?
These women must be very unlike the ones I've met. Which is lucky for me I suppose
Female genital mutilation victim was 'aged just seven'
- Thread starter dirtychinchilla
- Start date
Women want mature intellectuals?
These women must be very unlike the ones I've met. Which is lucky for me I suppose
I think the female version of circumsision is horrific and totally not needed for any reason. When I was younger I asked my parents why I had no foreskin, and they said it was for hygeine reasons and a preventative for future problems. Just to make it clear I have grown up in a Christian family, not Jewish, so I guess that religion doesn't really matter.
I am glad I have had it done, and I think it not only looks better, but also cleaner too. From my experience I don't think there are any issues with less sensitivity, and also nearly every woman I have been with has commented that they prefer it circumsised as it is cleaner and better looking.
I am glad I have had it done, and I think it not only looks better, but also cleaner too. From my experience I don't think there are any issues with less sensitivity, and also nearly every woman I have been with has commented that they prefer it circumsised as it is cleaner and better looking.
You'll forgive me if I don't take your word for it, someone who has been irreversibly... 'modified' is bound to try and defend it.
They are hardly going to say it was ugly and wished you had never had it done are they?
I totally see the point you are making, and I agree with it, but I will still defend my point of view.
You are right.. I have not experienced otherwise, but I have not experienced any problems with the function of it in the bedroon department. Maybe it is desensitised, and all those guys that have been circumsised last longer than those who haven't *canofworms*
This is true... However, they would also not make a point of saying it, if it was ugly
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 3,783
I totally see the point you are making, and I agree with it, but I will still defend my point of view.
You are right.. I have not experienced otherwise, but I have not experienced any problems with the function of it in the bedroon department. Maybe it is desensitised, and all those guys that have been circumsised last longer than those who haven't *canofworms*
This is true... However, they would also not make a point of saying it, if it was ugly
I'll take my greater sensitivity thank you.
Maybe they felt obliged to say something, seeing as most don't comment full stop. Well except in my case, because I am 2"...................from the floor.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
But god created man in his image. Why would man or woman then choose to alter this by cutting anything off?
Because God doesn't want women to enjoy sex.
It is
If man was created in his image, then where did the women come from?
Lets face it, he knew what the hell he was doing when designing women!!
Yep, it's an argument i see Americans throw around all the time, as they all seem to be circumcised over there for some reason. It will only be cleaner if you don't clean properly in the first place.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Apr 2007
- Posts
- 6,638
dirty dongs unite under their ant eater banner to defend the fact their dongs are just as clean and as good looking as my carefully cut and sculpted meat.
LETS BE REALITY HERE, NO ITS NOT.
haters be mad cause no girl wants to pull down your pants and see an ant eater and then put it in her mouth.
LETS BE REALITY HERE, NO ITS NOT.
haters be mad cause no girl wants to pull down your pants and see an ant eater and then put it in her mouth.
Last edited:
Sorry you were mutilated at birth m8
- Joined
- 4 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 3,783
Hahaha, you are bitterly mad. You do realise that uncircumcised men can pull their foreskin back right? We have tens of thousands of extra nerve endings that give additional protection, a greater degree of protection, less weird sensations, less drying out.
Give the below a good read then decide.
http://www.norm.org/lost.html
All I see here is someone who was bitter that he had his sausage peeled.
It's delicious irony that the origins of circumcision is to prevent masturbation, but the guy who is clearly most insecure about having no foreskin is also managing to come across as the biggest ****** in the Thread.