EA acknowledges gamer distaste for Origin "We get it." – EVP Andrew Wilson

Soldato
Joined
31 May 2005
Posts
15,640
Location
Nottingham
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...n-is-not-about-transactions-its-about-service

Electronic Arts executive vice president Andrew Wilson agrees that the company’s Origin distribution platform is perceived as “just one more thing [PC gamers] have to install, another roadblock in the way of getting and playing a game.”

Speaking with GamesIndustry.biz, Wilson said, “I think when I look at the journey that service has taken, I think the transaction component of that service has taken a disproportionate amount of the communication and mind share of what we really try and provide, and the barrier that puts in between you and the game that you want to play.”

Wilson said that the solution was to emphasise the platform’s benefits as a service. “If you take away the transaction part of that, which for us in all honesty is a very small part of the service, and you think about consistent downloads, consistent access, and understanding of friends' presence, you think about game enhancements like chat and one-click join and in-game overlay, and all of a sudden you start to get to what Origin is – which is a service that makes your EA games better.”

“Some people really do like Origin, for all of those reasons; other people don't because of some less than optimal experience they've had. Initial experiences are hard to overcome, and that's going to take time,” conceded Wilson. “What we would say is ‘We get it. We understand it. We have heard, we have made some changes already in terms of how we do things, and we're looking at more changes that we'll talk about over the coming months that really are gamer-focused.’

Same old EA PR dribble.

"Hey we hear what your saying, well, we pretend we do. We still have our fingers up our *** going la la la".
 
Last edited:
Origin is just the easiest part of the EA empire to dislike, but what EA don't seem to understand is the perception that they take over companies or development of games and then ruin them or turn them into cash cows.

DAOC and Ultima Online being two beautifully stupid examples.
 
If they really care about improving things for gamers then they'll sort things out with Valve and give people the choice of buying their games on Steam or other content delivery platforms. Having ME 1&2 on Steam but not being able to get 3 made me rage. :mad:
 
Origin is just the easiest part of the EA empire to dislike, but what EA don't seem to understand is the perception that they take over companies or development of games and then ruin them or turn them into cash cows.

DAOC and Ultima Online being two beautifully stupid examples.

My beloved Westwood Studios :(
 
I don't mind EA having a game "portal" so to speak, like Steam.
My problem is that Origin is an absolutely terrible application. It's like they didn't even consider user experience.

EDIT:
Unless of course it's changed in the last 3 months? I haven't launched it in ages as i've gone off of BF3.
 
With Orgin the actual idea I have no problems with. But the design and the way it runs is appaling. You'd think that if they are thinking that Orgin is the way a company is going to make billions of $$$$$ you'd think they'd have the nouse to make it so it boots and runs in less than 5 seconds not 5 minutes.

Some businesses are just full of retards.
 
Origin is just the easiest part of the EA empire to dislike, but what EA don't seem to understand is the perception that they take over companies or development of games and then ruin them or turn them into cash cows.

DAOC and Ultima Online being two beautifully stupid examples.

UO .... whyyy EA.......WHYYY :'(

On of the major things I dislike is how they think of these awesome features and the public will love them but most of the time they don't. Sim city... always online xD

ahhh back in the days of BF2... install game from CD, patch, create account, load game, browse servers join. now... create origin account and sign away any rights, activate copy of BF3... download whole game and all the DLC etc etc. go to wed browser, go into battle log, find server and connect, wait for origin to open, wait for BF3 to load..... "Could not connect to EA Online".... WTF?!?!?!?! rinse repeat xD don;t get me wrong... battlelog does have some nice stuff and it;s grown on me but wish things like that were more optional :(
 
Last edited:
Why don't they just use steam, problem solved and they wouldn't need to upkeep the application. Also keeps everyone happy.

Or am I missing something?
 
When Valve created steam they did so from the PoV of a developer who was sick of dealing with douchebag publishers and their douchebag business models designed to keep developers poor and entirely reliant on publishers.

Then publishers finally accept that discs and boxes aren't the future so start making their own versions of steam from their own douchebaggy PoV. So what we're getting on the user end is an application that is delivering the bare minimum in functionality and entirely devoid of innovation just so they can reward gamers with a 50% price hiked title, noting that packing & distribution was responsible for 2/3rds of the cost of a game on a shelf in a store.
 
Same old rubbish we can change speech but when users keep going back to them no wonder they think they can keep giving us utter crap all the time. They need to do everyone a favour and just use steam and let that origin pants die off.
 
Yes eveyone use Steam monopolys are a good thing :rolleyes:

Drives me nuts this everyone complains about DRM and about GFWL, Uplay and Origin while steam is the same thing, the fact these "super moral pc gamers" can be bought by some deep discounted year old games shows how hipocritical it all is.
 
Yes eveyone use Steam monopolys are a good thing :rolleyes:

Drives me nuts this everyone complains about DRM and about GFWL, Uplay and Origin while steam is the same thing, the fact these "super moral pc gamers" can be bought by some deep discounted year old games shows how hipocritical it all is.

Who is complaining about the DRM? the complaint about Origin is that it's ****, offers gamers absolutely nothing and was EA getting the absolute basics setup to rip all of their games off Steam and start charging 50% more through Origin. There is a reason Steam enjoys it's success. It's made for gamers, there is no blind devotion on my part... if Origin offered exactly what steam did and then more I'd switch in a second, but it's not even close and it has no intentions of doing so. They have strong franchises that if you want to play, as millions do, you've no choice in the matter.
 
"We hear you!!!!!!!" = "Yeah yeah yeah, whatever you pack of *****, just buy our new game!!!!"

Same old, same old.
 
Who is complaining about the DRM? the complaint about Origin is that it's ****, offers gamers absolutely nothing and was EA getting the absolute basics setup to rip all of their games off Steam and start charging 50% more through Origin. There is a reason Steam enjoys it's success. It's made for gamers, there is no blind devotion on my part... if Origin offered exactly what steam did and then more I'd switch in a second, but it's not even close and it has no intentions of doing so. They have strong franchises that if you want to play, as millions do, you've no choice in the matter.


See valve releasing HL2 & CS:S 9 years ago......

The only diffrence is valve only release a AAA game once a decade.
 
Why don't they just use steam, problem solved and they wouldn't need to upkeep the application. Also keeps everyone happy.

Or am I missing something?

You are missing something. Why would they use a competitors system when it's cheaper to use their own.
 
I use steam far more than Origin, but to be honest I dont see what the problem is. I buy games install them and play them. Job done. The only problem with it was when I had my account hacked by some guy from Latvia, the blokes at tech support were really good and appologetic.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom