Crime Editor of The Times just tweeted this...
![]()
The arrest of the McCanns perhaps?
Crime Editor of The Times just tweeted this...
![]()
The Metropolitan Police says it has new evidence and new witnesses in the Madeleine McCann case as it moves to a formal investigation into her disappearance.
At this point in time... maybe they will reveal how much money they have made on their "lost" child.
Is this common viewpoint based on hearsay, speculation or anything solid?
Statistically the most likely person to kill a young child is it's parents, so it wouldn't surprise me if it was them.
Indeed that aspect as-well seems to be washed over.I have no idea who took or potentially killed the girl, however her a parents were clearly negligent and should have been at the least investigated by social services and the police.
I have no idea who took or potentially killed the girl, however her a parents were clearly negligent and should have been at the least investigated by social services and the police.
I agree, but would like to add my own following thought that what happened is utterly nightmarish to a parent and can never be called deserved, surely? Some of the things people say about the family seems to be speculation of the most base and flagrant kind. Even if the parents were eventually found guilty of the girl's murder, the detractors could never know that, so why do these parties insist on offering strong opinions against the family?
People rarely seem to research their opinions first - a crime all the more inexcusable considering the wealth of free knowledge accessible to all thanks to the net.
At this point in time... maybe they will reveal how much money they have made on their "lost" child.
I agree, but would like to add my own following thought that what happened is utterly nightmarish to a parent and can never be called deserved, surely? Some of the things people say about the family seems to be speculation of the most base and flagrant kind. Even if the parents were eventually found guilty of the girl's murder, the detractors could never know that, so why do these parties insist on offering strong opinions against the family?
She's dead and we'll probably never know who did it.
I hold little hope of any decent evidence showing itself after 6 years. Every day that passes, this miniscule chance of closure with the case becomes even smaller.