Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman Acquitted

Really? have you got evidence that the jury didn't hear?

Well I have you do know he was a drug dealer and filmed his mates beating up a guy and stole his bike.

I'm glad of the verdict now he can go on now and try to live a normal life.

I know Trayvon was a little bugger but the whole incident was fat Zimmerman's fault and he should have went down for Vigilantism. It really doesn't matter now as there are dangerous groups of people out there who want Zimmerman dead, his life is over and he only has himself to blame.
 
I know Trayvon was a little bugger but the whole incident was fat Zimmerman's fault and he should have went down for Vigilantism. It really doesn't matter now as there are dangerous groups of people out there who want Zimmerman dead, his life is over and he only has himself to blame.


What has fat got to do with it? The kid was a known drug dealer and used guns and you say "little bugger" hate to live where you do.

The kid had the chance to go home, he never he hid then after 4 mins he attacked the other guy.
 
What has fat got to do with it? The kid was a known drug dealer and used guns and you say "little bugger" hate to live where you do.

The kid had the chance to go home, he never he hid then after 4 mins he attacked the other guy.

It's not even worth it with him, don't bother. The name says it all.
 
I know Trayvon was a little bugger but the whole incident was fat Zimmerman's fault and he should have went down for Vigilantism. It really doesn't matter now as there are dangerous groups of people out there who want Zimmerman dead, his life is over and he only has himself to blame.

what specific law does someone have to breach and be convicted over in order to say they "went down for Vigilantism" ?
 
So what actually happened?

Hispanic male shots black teenage drug dealer and wannabe gangster who attacked him, press "forget" that the defendant is hispanic and whip up a frenzy, black community play usual violated and oppressed card with hint of rioting should the verdict not go their way?
 
No that's the complete opposite of his admission. He said he was walking back to his truck when Martin approached him and said "You got a problem? Well you do now." And then proceeded to attack Zimmerman.

When don't know exactly what happened, but Zimmerman had the injuries, and Martin didn't, suggesting that Martin did attack Zimmerman.

Really? Stupid newspaper I read said the opposite.

Must got back to the source and check
 
So what actually happened?

Hispanic male shots black teenage drug dealer and wannabe gangster who attacked him, press "forget" that the defendant is hispanic and whip up a frenzy, black community play usual violated and oppressed card with hint of rioting should the verdict not go their way?
Well, more hispanic security guy racially profiled a guy who was on his way home, reported it to the police, but despite being told not to, got out of his car and chased after the guy - after this point it gets a bit hazy, but at some point afterwards he ends up apparently getting a beating at which point he shoots him. But yeah violated and oppressed and all that and possibly rioting to come.
 
what specific law does someone have to breach and be convicted over in order to say they "went down for Vigilantism" ?

I do not know, all i do know is that it is illegal people get arrested for it and it was because of his super cop fantasy that he wound up shooting a kid. He had the opportunity to tell the lad to freeze or shoot him in the leg (before and during the scuffle) but he shot him in the torso instead.
 
So putting race aside, and also putting aside ridiculous laws an armed man shot dead an unarmed boy and people are OK with that? The man has got away with murder.

The morons in charge of america need to sprout some knackers and remove firearms from the general public. There is no need for a member of the general public to walk around with a gun!
 
What has fat got to do with it? The kid was a known drug dealer and used guns and you say "little bugger" hate to live where you do.

The kid had the chance to go home, he never he hid then after 4 mins he attacked the other guy.

Well there was a small conversation first before the fight and speaking of chances, zimmerman had the opportunity to cease following trayvon and mind his own business. He had the chance to not profile trayvon on the fly but instead he followed through and a kid got shot. It is all zimmermans fault for playing out his cop fantasy. It matters not how naughty trayvon was as he was only reacting to being stalked at the time which isn't a crime. Trayvon himself was acting in self defence too.
 
So putting race aside, and also putting aside ridiculous laws an armed man shot dead an unarmed boy and people are OK with that? The man has got away with murder.

The morons in charge of america need to sprout some knackers and remove firearms from the general public. There is no need for a member of the general public to walk around with a gun!

What about all the poor people in the UK, minding their own business, out with their g/f's or friends, then attacked by a group of chavs out for a fight, and have been left brain damaged or dead? Seems to happen on a regular basis. I'm not sure America wants to go there.

Two sides to every coin.
 
What about all the poor people in the UK, minding their own business, out with their g/f's or friends, then attacked by a group of chavs out for a fight, and have been left brain damaged or dead? Seems to happen on a regular basis. I'm not sure America wants to go there.

Two sides to every coin.


Let's dish out lethal firearms to everyone and see what happens then :confused:

What are you even trying to say?
 
So putting race aside, and also putting aside ridiculous laws an armed man shot dead an unarmed boy and people are OK with that? The man has got away with murder.

The morons in charge of america need to sprout some knackers and remove firearms from the general public. There is no need for a member of the general public to walk around with a gun!


Trying reading the thread.

Well there was a small conversation first before the fight and speaking of chances, zimmerman had the opportunity to cease following trayvon and mind his own business. He had the chance to not profile trayvon on the fly but instead he followed through and a kid got shot. It is all zimmermans fault for playing out his cop fantasy. It matters not how naughty trayvon was as he was only reacting to being stalked at the time which isn't a crime. Trayvon himself was acting in self defence too.


Another one. Try reading the thread.
 
Aye, I think he was lucky he approached someone with history that night rather than someone clean and despite Zimmerman's dodgy views on black kids and his apparent borderline vigilantism approach to his job it was enough to create doubt as to who actually started it.


Wtf are you talking about when you say zimmermans view on black kids? You do realise that he and his wife were mentors to black kids whose parents were separated he continued this even when there were no state funds to help with it Link , not only that he helped a homeless black guy who was beaten by a white police captains son Link. How about doing a little reading/research before spouting off complete and utter race baiting rubbish?

The media played the race card too, this is the image that the media has been using when trayvon was 12 years old even the BBC today is using this image Img Link. Now compare that pic with these ones from his phone and other places of what he actually looked like at his current age, One, Two, Three. You don't see any thing strange there?
 
Last edited:
I do not know, all i do know is that it is illegal people get arrested for it and it was because of his super cop fantasy that he wound up shooting a kid. He had the opportunity to tell the lad to freeze or shoot him in the leg (before and during the scuffle) but he shot him in the torso instead.

You don't really know at all - you're just making assumptions that he could have actually been charged and convicted of some offense you're not even sure exists....
 
Let's dish out lethal firearms to everyone and see what happens then :confused:

What are you even trying to say?

It's not everyone though is it. To obtain a concealed weapons license, you have to go through a background check. If you've been in trouble with the law, you're not getting one.

Leaving a decent amount of law abiding citizens with the necessary tools to defends themselves, and the criminals un-armed, or if they choose to illegally obtain a firearm, and caught, then they can expect a lengthy prison sentence.

America is not the wild west you know.
 
Trying reading the thread.




Another one. Try reading the thread.
I have read the thread thanks


A member of the public shouldn't be allowed by law to use lethal force against another member of public especially against an unarmed member of the public. That's all I'm saying.
Its my opinion. Some people think its justified, I don't.
 
Wtf are you talking about when you say zimmermans view on black kids? You do realise that he and his wife were mentors to black kids whose parents were separated he continued this even when there were no state funds to help with it Link , not only that he helped a homeless black guy who was beaten by a white police captains son Link. How about doing a little reading/research before spouting off complete and utter race baiting rubbish?
Rubbish? What cause did he have to stop someone who was going about their legal business, whilst describing the kid to the police dispatcher as:-

We've had some break-ins in my neighborhood, and there's a real suspicious guy

just walking around looking about

This guy looks like he is up to no good or he is on drugs or something

these ********, they always get away

Before shooting the kid yards from where he was staying?
 
Back
Top Bottom