So you remember them.... unlike the ones that look like normal cars.
I dont get the i3.... looks like its been designed with engine package packaging constraints yet the small motor is in the rear and its not really that aerodynamic either with a Cd rumoured at 0.28. Those dips in the rear door look ghastly but i guess they sat the occupant too low to the belt line and too many small people in the back were throwing up so they needed to fix the vision!
I quite like it. I know its not a good looking car in the standard sense, but its quit interesting looking, and I like the interior. I think the fact that it's a BMW, looks futuristic, and will probably drive quite well, means it will probably sell more than any other EV yet.
The amount of power used by the Nav/radio etc is going to be roughly equivalent to the power drained by a normal car (and therefore loss of fuel efficiency, and range) - which is absolutely miniscule compared to the power drain of moving a car.
You could run a 400W sound system + 100W 30" TV from it for nearly two days continuously before draining the battery, and the motor is rated for 250 times that at peak power.
A Nav system is probably going to be drawing between 10-20W - so totally insignificant.
I wonder what the cost of "switching to a conventional BMW car" for say, a week, will be?
Being able to grab a 3 or 5 series for tripping down to the south coast, or across France would mean that I could almost get away with an all-electric car.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.