Doreen Lawrence to be made a peer

Soldato
Joined
19 Feb 2010
Posts
13,258
Location
London
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23519563

I mean, really? Where has this come from?

Complaining lots about police (allegedly) mishandling a case gets you a peerage? Is this just something being done to shut her up and get her out of the picture?

How about peerages for John Sweeney and PC Blakelocks' family members as well, while we're giving them out to people of tenacious character?

I'm a bit confused, in all honesty. Please, enlighten me...
 
Last edited:
Allegedly mishandling? Is it in dispute that the MPS is/was a profoundly racist organisation that botched the investigation due to indifference at best and corruption at worst?
 
Allegedly mishandling? Is it in dispute that the MPS is/was a profoundly racist organisation that botched the investigation due to indifference at best and corruption at worst?

No matter how much of a **** up it was in the first place, this still makes no sense IMO. :confused:

Your son's dead, we're sorry for the inconvenience, have a peerage.
 
You're out of order with that comment. If my son was killed by a corrupt/racist organisation then I wouldn't shut up about it either until I brought them to their knees.

He was killed by criminals :confused:

The police messed up the investigation and were racist but they didn't kill him.
 
tasteless and silly comment

XpZ7ziu.gif.png
 
Last edited:
Its a bit of a joke... but then again so are a fair few other peerages... lets face it some are still in there due to an accident of birth, climbing the career ladder in the church, making big political donations, doing well in business and networking well etc..etc..
 
Considering how most people sitting in the House of Lords got their peerage I finding it odd that people can be bemused when someone who fought for 20 years against injustice gets one.

If you want to be bemused be so against the whole system of an unelected House in a so-called Democracy.
 
She is a formidable and indomitable woman who refused to be bowed by the Authorites to fight for what she knew was right...she campaigned not only for justice for her own son and others, but against institutional racism and against hatred and divsion in our communities and has tirelessly campaigned and helped raise awareness for more community cohesion and her charity helps disadvantaged youngsters make the most of their potential as well as addressing racial and social inequality in our inner cities and beyond.

For this alone, I would say she is as deserving, if not more so, than many of the peers already sitting.
 
Agreed, although I don't know much about the case. Anyway, anybody's better than the likes of Jeffrey Archer.
 
...and her charity helps disadvantaged youngsters make the most of their potential as well as addressing racial and social inequality in our inner cities and beyond.

For this alone, I would say she is as deserving, if not more so, than many of the peers already sitting.

She's not the first to be so tenacious against the system though, and let's face it, like any of us, she put her own interests above all (as any parent would). I'm pretty sure she never set out to be a hero - she just wanted justice for her son.

While we're talking about contribution to society/youth/disadvantaged kids, I can't help but wonder why Camila Batmanghelidjh doesn't have a peerage yet? Surely she's had a positive impact on far more disadvantaged young lives.

I agree with the notion that the house of lords is a joke to start with, btw. Scrap the lot and start again with elected representatives.
 
Last edited:
* Many are made peers because of who their parents were.
* Some are made peers for simply belonging to a religious heirarchy.
* A man is made a peer for being a meanie on The Apprentice.
* A woman is made a peer who fought tirelessly over 20 years for justice, uncovering police corruption and serious societal problems along the way.

Yet someone the latter is the problem?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom