Who should be the next person to play Batman?

Thomas Jane would be pretty good as batman but hed have to polish himself up a bit for bruce wayne.

Ben Affleck is a pretty good choice imo, I liked him in daredevil but he will have to go a lot darker for batmans role compared to bruce.
 
Thomas Jane would be pretty good as batman but hed have to polish himself up a bit for bruce wayne.

Ben Affleck is a pretty good choice imo, I liked him in daredevil but he will have to go a lot darker for batmans role compared to bruce.

no no no no Thomas Jane is the Punisher, and all being well will be playing the role once more soon if his laundrette thing is anything to go by. google it as its not family friendly :D
 
Bale's/Batman first reaction:

7DM8uiU.png


then........

eIvcHDR.png


:p :D


On a more serious thought, I was like WTF?! But then I thought about his recent films and he could work out to be pretty decent, however, no one will replace Bale!
 
It's gonna be funny pulling this back when Affleck does a decent job of it.

All they have to do is stick with a proper incarnation to the screen of Batman and it'll show that Bales as Batman was a wet behind the ears pussy.
 
no no no no Thomas Jane is the Punisher, and all being well will be playing the role once more soon if his laundrette thing is anything to go by. google it as its not family friendly :D

Ahh, I thought I read hedidnt have any intentions of doing another punisher movie but it was a while ago. He was awesome in the 2004 one though, I still enjoy that film now and again but I enjoy the Dolph one too :D

Ill look it up now!
 
Couple of thoughts really.

He's an interesting choice. Academy Award Winner Ben Affleck is probably unlikely to see a major Hollywood style payday like this ever again, so it's probably the best moment in his career to do something like this. There's a lot of good feeling between Warner Bros and Affleck just now, and not only will Batman vs Superman be a huge payday for him, it also puts him in a franchise which might see him possibly direct a Batman or Justice League film (with a small role for Batman) in the future. So either way, even if he's rubbish he's done a good thing, and if he turns out to be good he'll get a blank cheque from Warner Bros to do whatever the hell he wants. If that leads to more films like Gone Baby Gone, The Town or Argo, then I'm all for this.

On the other hand, we've only just forgiven him for the massive amount of **** he'd done before he started doing his own films, so if this goes pear shaped all of that will be forgotten.

It's probably appropriate to wheel out all the Heath Ledger talk. Many were wondering what Nolan was playing at casting him as The Joker. It worked well, and people who are outraged at those who are outraged for the choice of Affleck seem to be using this argument to demonstrate that we might be in for a surprise. The problem with that argument, though, is that Nolan is a great director who's a half decent writer himself and has a particularly good writer in his brother. The Snyder/Goyer combination contains significantly less talent both on and off screen, so it's not a fair comparison.

Conversely, having Affleck on board is probably good from a creative stand point because we know he is a better writer and director than both Snyder and Goyer, so having him cast his eye over a script and tweak his character accordingly can only be a good thing when we consider just how rubbish Man of Steel is.
 
The last 4 films I've seen Affleck in were superb and he acted everyone else off the screen.

Which begs the question would he get involved in the load of tosh as I presume he's been unfortunate enough to see Man of Steel?
I was actually gonna say the same thing, hes probably better as a director though.

Still not a great fit - DC want to kill their films it seems...

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
Batman vs Superman - oh dear :o

ps3ud0 :cool:

Depends on what you know of Batman, if its just the films ( in which the Nolan version made absolutely no sense and Batman is a complete wuss that can barley understand his own voice) then yea, he's pretty much completely and utterly useless after his joints are knackered out after a handful of fights.

If its anything like the comics where he is extremely fast, strong agile and his best strength is his detective and psychological out thinking of anyone he comes face to face with, then he manages to beat the crap of Superman to an inch within his life.

Everyone has this notion that the Batman in the Nolan films was badass...he wasnt, he was a pathetic interpretation of what Batman is, he is FAR more brutal, and actually is able to fight.

Also, Superman is NOT the strongest, or the fastest hero, far from it, compared to some in the universe, he is very slow and not as strong.
 
I think the vast majority of cinema-goers only know of the films, which is why this just doesnt interest me at all. Im sorry but I just dont think comic book films are made for comic book fans...

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
It's frustrating when actors get reused for new characters:

e.g.

Human Torch --> Captain America

Daredevil --> Batman

Storm --> Cat Woman

Deadpool --> Hal Jordan

Just find some other actors ffs!!
 
I think the vast majority of cinema-goers only know of the films, which is why this just doesnt interest me at all. Im sorry but I just dont think comic book films are made for comic book fans...

ps3ud0 :cool:

Yet...the more they reboot the film closer each time to the original story and characters, the more popular they become...huh.

It doesn't matter, even if you take the Trilogy on its own merit, is was pretty god awful except for the second one that was completely saved by Ledger playing the Joker. Who everyone laughed off as well.

Also, the mistake most are making, is they are seeing this as a Bale replacement, it's not, it set in a completely different universe from the one Nolan made up.
One where Batman has actually been about for many years etc.
 
Last edited:
Yet...the more they reboot the film closer each time to the original story and characters, the more popular they become...huh.

It doesn't matter, even if you take the Trilogy on its own merit, is was pretty god awful except for the second one that was completely saved by Ledger playing the Joker. Who everyone laughed off as well.
Do they? The latest Superman film was meh and I doubt it did anything as good as the Batman Begins movie in the box office, you know the one you think has an inferior Batman and plot...

Though wiki says Im wrong!
Also, the mistake most are making, is they are seeing this as a Bale replacement, it's not, it set in a completely different universe from the one Nolan made up.
One where Batman has actually been about for many years etc.
Should have waited later, just easier to ignore the Nolan universe then, very hard to do it right now without some active marketing telling us to

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
Last edited:
Umm Begins didnt actually do THAT well, as it was shaking off the previous films, it got a recorded, it wasnt that popular at the box office.
$205,343,774 ( worldwide $372.7)

Where as Sups has got in over $605 mil, and we still have to have media sales added to that.
 
Last edited:
Yes, the batman we saw in the Nolan films was not like the cartoons etc., however, this was trying to stay as realistic as possible hence why Bane wasn't stupidly strong, 3 times the size of batman etc.

As for not being able to fight :confused: He only took on groups of thugs that were armed with base ball bats, guns and a SWAT team etc. Pretty sure if that was me or anyone else posting in this thread we would be dead or badly injured..... The fight scenes were poorly done in the last film but they did a good job with the first two and again you have to remember that since this was trying to be realistic, his suit wasn't exactly easy to move about in due to the armour etc., more so for the first suit. In the cartoons, comics he just wears essentially clothes with a utility belt and fancy cape.

As for knees etc. being knackered, well again in a realistic universe of course that is bound to happen when he is out most, if not every night fighting criminals etc. and he was out of action etc. for 8 years. Just look at every single athlete, they all have some form of an injury and many retire before they are even "old" simply because they can't compete with the much younger ones.

The only area where Nolan's batman lacked was the detective area. Although he was still good but they shouldn't have got Lucius fox or Gordon to help him as Bruce/Batman should/would have been able to do that stuff himself.
 
Umm Begins didnt actually do THAT well, as it was shaking off the previous films, it got a recorded, it wasnt that popular at the box office.
$205,343,774 ( worldwide $372.7)

Where as Sups has got in over $605 mil, and we still have to have media sales added to that.
Yeah I just saw that, the differences between it and the two sequels is amazing regards box office takings...

ps3ud0 :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom