Loosing weight 4miles and 2000 calories a day
- Thread starter Bald-Eagle22
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Posts
- 2,119
- Location
- UK
Trying wayyyyyyy to hard to troll. Pathetic.
Not trolling at all you pillock. Are you to ignorant to see my point? Are you a health god with a nice body? I thought not. My point is everyone is missing a simple explanation and all this brocrap my 6 year old nephew would say.
Calories in vs calories out
Work out maintenance
Subtract 500-1000 calories
One pound = 3500 calories
1.5 stone = 21 pounds = 73500 calories.
Cutting at 500 calorie deficit a day you will achieve your goal in 141 days. At 1000 cal deficit 74 days
Yes it is very doable even by Christmas this is baby weight and your not exactly single digits so it should be a breeze and yes fools if my lovely three Big Macs fits my macros I will cut on it, silly people gosh
While for once you do make a semi valid point, why does anyone who gives advice need to have reached some sort of benchmark you've set in your head such as your constant banging on about 100kg bench or now if you're not a chiseled god then what's the point?
I may not be a ripped heavy lifting god but it doesn't mean I don't understand the science and action behind it, pull your head out of your backside.
Associate
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Posts
- 2,119
- Location
- UK
But my backside is attractive.
Moving on its not semi valid its cold cut facts explained and dumbed down. But i have no problem with people lifting 20kg bench, my point is the people speaking like misc gods that can't lift squat diddly
And my point is just because they may or may not have put their knowledge into action doesn't make it any less valid, most of the best coaches in the world would have their backsides handed to them in whatever sport they coach by their players but that doesn't mean the player knows better.
I can't believe i'm gonna get into this but I can see his point.
I think having acheived success in the thing you are advising on can (not necessarily always does) add a bit off credability to the advice.
Who would you want deadlift advice from, me or Ice? Who would you want advice from about being a big, hairy muscular mofo, me or Freefaller?
Thats said, I wouldn't eat 3 big macs a day even if it did fit my macros.
EDIT: Professional coaches is a bit different to internet forum wannabees.
Wow, just wow. Keyboard warrior on full steam ahead today? Abit aggressive for a reply isn't it? Not once did i say i have a nice body or can lift as much as you (by your 100kg goal) but i'm learning from some of the guys here to make my body and strength better. Isnt that why we are all here?.
The problem i had with your post...Is what i quoted. Just because you didn't elaborate enough with a sweeping statement and i facepalm, you get your feathers all rustled.
Wouldnt this of been a lot easier and less argumentative to say? Without the 3 big macs a day crap?
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Posts
- 2,119
- Location
- UK
Okay I apologize however, the fact I was accused of being a troll because of my response.
Not at all, what happens if I don't eat until 8pm as I've been busy all day and I want three big macs, 500 cals each, and I'm cutting @ 1500 - fills my macros. I'm pointing out you don't have to eat clean to loose weight so suggesting simply 'cut out all the processed and junk is rubbish' because what happens if someones eating 4 meals, healthy, rice salmon steak, big portions exceeding 2.5k cals. They're eating clean but not loosing weight? Just implying you can eat whatever you want as long as it fits your macros. He asked for weight loss advice not health guidance.
That's all well and good but I think it would be much better advice to eat clean and watch your calories, you want a good balance or you'll feel like absolute **** if you're getting no nutrients from **** food whilst only eating 1500 calories or so.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 92,031
- Location
- Falling...
You don't have to eat clean to lose weightno, by why not eat clean? There's more to calories than just calories (bear with me). Macros play an important part as to how energy, and recovery is distributed in your body. Of course you can cut just eating fat or only carbs or anything like that - but why would you want to?
Eating cruciferous veg, fruits and a selection of meants and fish is far more beneficial. You also have to consider hormonal responses and insulin sensitivity.
Yes, in general, lower calories will lead to weight loss - but it's not the best way to be healthy.
Eating cruciferous veg, fruits and a selection of meants and fish is far more beneficial. You also have to consider hormonal responses and insulin sensitivity.
Yes, in general, lower calories will lead to weight loss - but it's not the best way to be healthy.
How are you so blind to this irony?
You seem to love being abrasive and proclaiming to know the truth of various subjects, and yet your accuracy is varied at best. Are you a health god with a nice body? I think not.
You are your own paradox, my silly little friend.
It doesn't work like this I'm afraid.
The body is an extremely complicated instrument and cannot be predicted in such a simple manner. Even if you were to accurately establish your true BMR (and TDEE changes massively on a day to day basis) you still have to accept that micromanagement - what you eat and when you eat - is far more important than counting calories regardless of your goal.
Eating 3 Big-Macs a day might meet your theoretical macros but you will be hugely depriving your body of essential nutrients, which are even more important when running a deficit as you are placing huge strain on your central nervous system. This is why people losing weight often get ill or feel so crap they give in. You could on the other hand eat one big mac, a bowl of fruit, plenty of vegetables, a salmon fillet and a glass of milk and still lose weight whilst not FUBARing your body through the deprivation of essential nutrients.
Trust me mate I've been cutting all summer and have enjoyed plenty of Big Macs, Dominos and drunk a hell of a lot of booze. I'm just sensible when I eat these and have a clean diet 80-90% of the time. I'm pretty sure had my diet just been Big Macs I'd either have given up through feeling horrendous or be really quite ill.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Posts
- 2,119
- Location
- UK
Not know the truth just basics.
Try power walking up the South Downs for lots of alternative terrain and steep hills three or for times a week. Push yourself to cover 10 -15 miles and when it gets easier stick 30-35 kilos on your back and push yourself, the weight will fly off you it certainly did me. As others have said try and drop lower than 2000 calories a day and eat cleanly and avoid eating **** basically.
You can't beat a good ramble.
You can't beat a good ramble.
Associate
- Joined
- 4 Mar 2010
- Posts
- 914
- Location
- Coventry
Perhaps switch that brisk walk into a jog / run?