Russia Today News Declares 9/11 An Inside Job False Flag Attack
- Thread starter phill1978
- Start date
- Status
RT is going to be broadcasting propaganda , but we have to remember that so is the BBC, Fox news & pretty much every single other channel.
You can trust each news outlet to report the worse of each nation (with a bias edge), some of the things you see in RT will not get shown on the air in the rest of the west - but on the flip side - RT refuses to report criticisms of Putin or the suppression of free speech (so you can only view that side from other news outlets).
RT is motivated to expose failings of the US, if they are also true then it's a much better story - if 9/11 is an inside job or not isn't really something I'm qualified personally to have an opinion on .
All I can say is that the USA has historically engaged in false flag operations & some parts of the government/private sector had a motivation.
It's not outside of the realms of possibility but the chances of finding clear evidence either way seem remote, even if somebody found something which seemed damning it would be disregarded instantly as being conspiracy theories nonsense.
From a political perspective it would be interesting if RT released a warning saying that the USA will perform a large terrorist act on the west over the coming months to justify a war via the usual proxy terrorists (through Saudi Arabia), if it's not true then nothing is lost.
If it is true then it renders a potential strategy of the US to get involved void.
You can trust each news outlet to report the worse of each nation (with a bias edge), some of the things you see in RT will not get shown on the air in the rest of the west - but on the flip side - RT refuses to report criticisms of Putin or the suppression of free speech (so you can only view that side from other news outlets).
RT is motivated to expose failings of the US, if they are also true then it's a much better story - if 9/11 is an inside job or not isn't really something I'm qualified personally to have an opinion on .
All I can say is that the USA has historically engaged in false flag operations & some parts of the government/private sector had a motivation.
It's not outside of the realms of possibility but the chances of finding clear evidence either way seem remote, even if somebody found something which seemed damning it would be disregarded instantly as being conspiracy theories nonsense.
From a political perspective it would be interesting if RT released a warning saying that the USA will perform a large terrorist act on the west over the coming months to justify a war via the usual proxy terrorists (through Saudi Arabia), if it's not true then nothing is lost.
If it is true then it renders a potential strategy of the US to get involved void.
What is actually a credible source? Do we even have news source that has not lied in the past?
BBC news if considered one of the more credible, disregarding occasional bias.
Anything disintegrates with enough energy and the planes didn't disintegrate anyway.
Anything without support against mavity will free fall and the buildings didn't free fall anyway.
Nobody is claiming that jet fuel melts steel - it's just a false claim by people with an agenda, like the crocoduck claim from the most ignorant or mendacious creationists.
The claims you refer to are not about asking questions. They're about having unquestioning faith in what people you regard as the authorities tell you, which is the opposite of asking questions.
Last edited:
Thought you'd bring it up, didn't they once broadcast a Georgian city that was supposedly bombed by the Russians into ashes, while in fact the footage was of a South Ossetian city that was bombed by the Georgians.
And that's just on top of my head/recently.
Once checked up their sources for a graph they presented about military spending, was 1 year out and one of the figures was wrong as source they used had different numbers.
BBC is not only biased, it's incompetent and lies too.
- Status