9/11 crap again, what do you think?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Like I said: "the method of total destruction/demoliton/whatever, whether fully intentional or not"

So it's impossible for a govement to take advantage of a situation, it must have been planned?
Click to expand...

Rather convenient that they got just the right kind of excuse to go do what they wanna do, don't you think?
 
Last edited:
Glaucus said:
I'm not an expert, never claimed to be an expert.
Click to expand...


Good because you certainly don't sound like one. Are you a structural engineer? You don't sound like one of those either, yet you presume to know an awful lot about who should know this that and the other.....
 
Personally i agree and disagree with both sides, there is more then enough evidence to be asking questions about what really happened, but there is some evidence to prove what happened happened.

But my real opinion is the US government knew what was going to happen, they new the terrorists where coming and what they where planning, they just allowed it to happen.

Some well placed mistakes like the fighter jets being AWOL on training and not picking up one of the hijackers as he was learning to fly a plane are just 2 examples of where they could have stopped this, but some well placed "mistakes" allowed it to happen.

This way they can control the flow of information as only a few members of the higher ups decide.
 
oulton said:
Good because you certainly don't sound like one. Are you a structural engineer? You don't sound like one of those either, yet you presume to know an awful lot about who should know this that and the other.....
Click to expand...

Great argment, are you an expert, why do you hold your views.

People even with training have been shower to get things wrong time and again. Especially when they don't even do the maths or modelling.
They say NISTs models are wrong. They have access to the plans l the photos, the videos, why haven't they made a report, they've made money, spent thousands of man hours lobbying, writing, conferences.
Why not go do the science and present it for peer review. The only thing they don't have is the original steel, and can't test it's strengths, although they could easily do one presumed strength and one using data contained in the nits reports.
 
One thing that is always ignored by the CTers. Most of the terrorists on 9/11 were Saudis. Saudi Arabia is one of America's strongest allies. This was hugely awkward for them. Surely an inside job would have used Afghan or Iraqi (or even better Iranian) terrorists? That would have given the US far more justification for what came after.

Are we supposed to believe that they can demolish one of the biggest office buildings in the world with complete secrecy, but that they couldn't get the nationality of the terrorists right?
 
LateX'Dog said:
But my real opinion is the US government knew what was going to happen, they new the terrorists where coming and what they where planning, they just allowed it to happen.

.
Click to expand...

This is the only CT open to debate IMO. And we are unlikely to ever know one way or the other. There's just no information on it. So arguments can't even be made one way or the other. Just opinion and speculation. Where as you say a lot of the other Stuff there is a lot of data and evidence.
 
Glaucus said:
Why take the risk of CD, why not just fly some planes into it. The effect would be the same and the excuss is still there, why over complicate it.
Click to expand...

We do not know the full story, we can't event begin to know. But to dismiss CD just because you can't think of a reason why it may have been beneficial to those orchestrating is a sign of a weak analytic mind.

Some ideas:

1. CD could minimize collateral damage to buildings in the vicinity
2. To destroy evidence (bury it under rubble which was then concreted over VERY quickly)
3. There are other theories, suspicions that whoever blew up the twin towers emptied the gold vaults before hand (around £100 billion according to some rumours)
 
Blue160 said:
One thing that is always ignored by the CTers. Most of the terrorists on 9/11 were Saudis.
Click to expand...

Actually nobody can say for sure who flew the planes!

One of the passports found in the debris belonged to a guy who went public to say he was still alive and had nothing to do with it!
 
Uncle Petey said:
And the very recent re-insuring of the Trade centers...

100 billion dollars! /Dr Evil
Click to expand...

Lol, another stupid Ct.

You know that the towers have always been insured and have to be insured.
What do you do when your car insurance runs out, ignore it.
That really is a stupid CT by crazies.
 
And insurance has to be renewed does it not?

But hey, if it ain't true, then it ain't true. Either way we're still talking billions.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom